- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Kalra, Ankur"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 18
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Absolute lymphocyte count as a predictor of mortality and readmission in heart failure hospitalization(Elsevier, 2022-03-05) Majmundar, Monil; Kansara, Tikal; Park, Hansang; Ibarra, Gabriel; Lenik, Joanna Marta; Shah, Palak; Kumar, Ashish; Doshi, Rajkumar; Zala, Harshvardhan; Chaudhari, Shobhana; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: There is renewed interest in pursuing frugal and readily available laboratory markers to predict mortality and readmission in heart failure. We aim to determine the relationship between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure hospitalization. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with heart failure. Patients were divided into two groups based on ALC, less than or equal to 1500 cells/mm3 and > 1500 cells/ mm3. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We did subgroup analysis based on ejection fraction and studied the association between ALC categories and clinical outcomes. Both ALC groups are matched by propensity score, outcomes were analyzed by Cox regression, and estimates are presented in hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We included 1029 patients in the pre-matched cohort and 766 patients in the propensity-score matched cohort. The median age was 64 years (IQR, 54-75), and 60.78% were male. In the matched cohort, ALC less than or equal to 1500 cells/mm3 had a higher risk of mortality compared with ALC > 1500 cells/mm3 (HR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.17-1.95; P = 0.002). These results were reproducible in subgroups of heart failure. When ALC was divided into four groups based on their levels, the lowest group of ALC had the highest risk of mortality. Conclusions: In patients with heart failure and both subgroups, ALC less than or equal to 1500 cells/mm3 had a higher risk of mortality. Patients in lower groups of the ALC categories had a higher risk of mortality.Item Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis(Elsevier, 2024-04-06) Bhat, Vivek; Kumar, Ashish; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been associated with poor outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), due to their favorable effects on ventricular remodeling, have been hypothesized to improve outcomes post-TAVR, yet there are no recommendations regarding their use. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs with those not receiving ACEIs/ARBs after TAVR. Methods: We performed a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Library until June 14, 2023, and included all studies comparing clinical outcomes between patients given ACEIs/ARBs and those not given ACEIs/ARBs after TAVR. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome. We used a random effects model with appropriate corrections to calculate relative risk (RR) and CIs, with all analyses carried out using R v4.0.3. Results: We included ten studies on the use of ACEIs/ARBs post-TAVR. Patients on ACEIs/ARBs had lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86, I2 = 62%, chi-square P < 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.88, I2 = 0%, chi-square P = 0.54), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96, I2 = 0%, chi-square P = 0.59). Patients on ACEIs/ARBs had a similar risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, vascular complications, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation. Conclusions: We found that patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs had a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Risk of other outcomes was similar to patients not receiving ACEIs/ARBs. Randomized clinical trials are needed to explore the benefits of ACEIs/ARBs post-TAVR, so that definitive guidelines can be developed.Item Association Between Social Vulnerability Index and Cardiovascular Disease: A Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Study(American Heart Association, 2022) Jain, Vardhmaan; Al Rifai, Mahmoud; Khan, Safi U.; Kalra, Ankur; Rodriguez, Fatima; Samad, Zainab; Pokharel, Yashashwi; Misra, Arunima; Sperling, Laurence S.; Rana, Jamal S.; Ullah, Waqas; Medhekar, Ankit; Virani, Salim S.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Social and environmental factors play an important role in the rising health care burden of cardiovascular disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from US census data as a tool for public health officials to identify communities in need of support in the setting of a hazardous event. SVI (ranging from a least vulnerable score of 0 to a most vulnerable score of 1) ranks communities on 15 social factors including unemployment, minoritized groups status, and disability, and groups them under 4 broad themes: socioeconomic status, housing and transportation, minoritized groups, and household composition. We sought to assess the association of SVI with self‐reported prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods and Results: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adults (≥18 years) in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2016 to 2019. Data regarding self‐reported prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities (including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, substance use), and ASCVD was captured using participants' response to a structured telephonic interview. We divided states on the basis of the tertile of SVI (first—participant lives in the least vulnerable group of states, 0–0.32; to third—participant lives in the most vulnerable group of states, 0.54–1.0). Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, sex, employment, income, health care coverage, and association with federal poverty line were constructed to assess the association of SVI with cardiovascular comorbidities. Our study sample consisted of 1 745 999 participants ≥18 years of age. States in the highest (third) tertile of social vulnerability had predominantly Black and Hispanic adults, lower levels of education, lower income, higher rates of unemployment, and higher rates of prevalent comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, substance use, and ASCVD. In multivariable logistic regression models, individuals living in states in the third tertile of SVI had higher odds of having hypertension (odds ratio (OR), 1.14 [95% CI, 1.11–1.17]), diabetes (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09–1.15]), hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06–1.12]), chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.12–1.23]), smoking (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03–1.07]), and ASCVD (OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12–1.19]), compared with those living in the first tertile of SVI. Conclusions: SVI varies across the US states and is associated with prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities and ASCVD, independent of age, race and ethnicity, sex, employment, income, and health care coverage. SVI may be a useful assessment tool for health policy makers and health systems researchers examining multilevel influences on cardiovascular‐related health behaviors and identifying communities for targeted interventions pertaining to social determinants of health.Item Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Health Professional Shortage Areas in Indiana(Elsevier, 2024-03-08) Gunderman, David J.; Kumar, Ashish; Munguia-Vazquez, Raymundo; Vora, Keyur; Shah, Chirag; Lambert, Nathan; Cavanaugh, Brendan; Dharmakumar, Rohan; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Amyloidosis, Sarcoidosis, and Hemochromatosis(Elsevier, 2023-12-30) Hussain, Bilal; Malik, Hamza; Mamas, Mamas A.; Desai, Rupak; Aggarwal, Vikas; Kumar, Gautam; Alraies, M. Chadi; Kalra, Ankur; Paul, Timir K.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Infiltrative diseases (IDs), including amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and hemochromatosis, are characterized by abnormal cellular infiltration in multiple organs, including the heart. The prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients with underlying IDs has not been well-studied. We evaluated the prevalence of IDs in patients undergoing PCI and their association with post-PCI outcomes. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2020 database was used to identify PCI patients with ICD-10 codes for a retrospective analysis. PCI patients were then divided into those with and without underlying IDs, which included amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and hemochromatosis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for composite post-PCI outcomes analyses. Results: Among 2,360,860 patients admitted to undergo PCI, 7855 patients had underlying IDs. The highest prevalence was observed for sarcoidosis (0.2%) followed by hemochromatosis (0.07%) and amyloidosis (0.04%). Underlying amyloidosis was associated with worse composite post-PCI outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.44; P = .02), including higher in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4; P = .04), higher risk of intra/post-PCI stroke (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1-16.0; P = .04), but not major bleeding (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.97-5.03; P = .058). In contrast, underlying sarcoidosis (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.87-1.41; P = .4), and hemochromatosis (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.77-1.8; P = .44) were not associated with composite post-PCI outcomes. Amyloidosis patients undergoing PCI also had higher hospitalization charges ($212,123 vs $141,137; P = .03) and longer length of stay (8.2 vs 3.9 days; P < .001). Conclusions: Underlying amyloidosis was associated with worse post-PCI outcomes including higher in-hospital mortality, intra/post-PCI stroke, and socioeconomic burden. A multidisciplinary approach and future studies are needed to investigate the screening and treatment strategies in these patients.Item Comparison of 6-Month Outcomes of Endovascular vs Surgical Revascularization for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia(American Medical Association, 2022-08-01) Majmundar, Monil; Patel, Kunal N.; Doshi, Rajkumar; Anantha-Narayanan, Mahesh; Kumar, Ashish; Reed, Grant W.; Puri, Rishi; Kapadia, Samir R.; Jaradat, Ziad A.; Bhatt, Deepak L.; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of MedicineImportance: The Bypass Versus Angioplasty for Severe Ischemia of the Leg randomized controlled trial showed comparable outcomes between endovascular revascularization (ER) and surgical revascularization (SR) for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). However, several observational studies showed mixed results. Most of these studies were conducted before advanced endovascular technologies were available. Objective: To compare ER and SR treatment strategies for 6-month outcomes among patients with CLI. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify 66 277 patients with CLI who underwent ER or SR from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. Data analyses were conducted from January 1, 2022, to February 8, 2022. A propensity score with 1:1 matching was applied. Patients with CLI who underwent ER or SR were identified, and those with missing information on the length of stay and/or younger than 18 years were excluded. Exposures: Endovascular or surgical revascularization. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a major amputation at 6 months. Significant secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 6-month mortality and an in-hospital safety composite of acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and vascular complication. Subgroup analysis was conducted for major amputation in high-volume centers. Results: A total of 66 277 patients were identified between 2016 and 2018 who underwent ER or SR for CLI. The Nationwide Readmissions Database does not provide racial and ethnic categories. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 69.3 (12) years, and 62.5% of patients were male. A total of 54 546 patients (82.3%) underwent ER and 11 731 (17.7%) underwent SR. After propensity score matching, 11 106 matched pairs were found. Endovascular revascularization was associated with an 18% higher risk of major amputation compared with SR (997 of 10 090 [9.9%] vs 869 of 10 318 [8.4%]; hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29; P = .001). However, no difference was observed in major amputation risk when both procedures were performed in high-volume centers. Endovascular revascularization and SR had similar mortality rates (517 of 11 106 [4.7%] vs 490 of 11 106 [4.4%]; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.93-1.20; P = .39). However, the ER group had a 17% lower risk of in-hospital safety outcomes compared with the SR group (2584 of 11 106 [23.3%] vs 2979 of 11 106 [26.8%]; odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P < .001). Conclusions and relevance: The results of this study suggest that ER was safer, without any difference in mortality, but ER was associated with an increased risk of major amputation compared with SR. However, the risk of major amputation was similar when both procedures were performed at high-volume centers.Item Coronary Artery Disease and Aspirin Intolerance: Background and Insights on Current Management(Springer, 2022) Thakker, Ravi A.; Salazar, Leonardo; Jazar, Deaa Abu; Bhakta, Pooja; Baker, Bryan; Patel, Chandani; Elbadawi, Ayman; Agarwal, Mayank; Albaeni, Aiham; Saleh, Mohammed; Esclovan, Jonathan; El Haddad, Danielle; Alwash, Hashim; Kalra, Ankur; Goel, Sachin S.; Widmer, Robert Jay; Chatila, Khaled; Khalife, Wissam; Motiwala, Afaq; McCracken, Jennifer; Jneid, Hani; Gilani, Syed; Medicine, School of MedicineAspirin is one of the most widely used medications across the global healthcare system and is the foundation in treating ischemic heart disease, as well as secondary prevention for ischemic and valvular heart disease. Challenges arise in treating patients with cardiovascular disease who have concomitant aspirin intolerance. Through an extensive review of the literature, we provide a comprehensive background on the pharmacology of aspirin, the mechanisms behind aspirin intolerance, the importance of aspirin in cardiovascular disease, and the management of aspirin intolerance in both acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease. Our review includes a multidisciplinary approach from the internist, allergist/immunologist, and cardiologist when evaluating this important patient population.Item Disparities in Prescription Patterns of Cardioprotective Medications in Postacute Myocardial Infarction Patients in Indiana(Elsevier, 2024-09-06) Gunderman, David; Kumar, Ashish; Munguia-Vazquez, Raymundo; Vora, Keyur P.; Shah, Chirag D.; Dharmakumar, Rohan; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Impact of Social Vulnerability on Comorbid Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the United States(Elsevier, 2022-09-20) Ganatra, Sarju; Dani, Sourbha S.; Kumar, Ashish; Khan, Safi U.; Wadhera, Rishi; Neilan, Tomas G.; Thavendiranathan, Paaladinesh; Barac, Ana; Hermann, Joerg; Leja, Monika; Deswal, Anita; Fradley, Michael; Liu, Jennifer E.; Sadler, Diego; Asnani, Aarti; Baldassarre, Lauren A.; Gupta, Dipti; Yang, Eric; Guha, Avirup; Brown, Sherry-Ann; Stevens, Jennifer; Hayek, Salim S.; Porter, Charles; Kalra, Ankur; Baron, Suzanne J.; Ky, Bonnie; Virani, Salim S.; Kazi, Dhruv; Nasir, Khurram; Nohria, Anju; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Racial and social disparities exist in outcomes related to cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objectives: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to study the impact of social vulnerability on mortality attributed to comorbid cancer and CVD. Methods: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database (2015-2019) was used to obtain county-level mortality data attributed to cancer, CVD, and comorbid cancer and CVD. County-level social vulnerability index (SVI) data (2014-2018) were obtained from the CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. SVI percentiles were generated for each county and aggregated to form SVI quartiles. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were estimated and compared across SVI quartiles to assess the impact of social vulnerability on mortality related to cancer, CVD, and comorbid cancer and CVD. Results: The AAMR for comorbid cancer and CVD was 47.75 (95% CI: 47.66-47.85) per 100,000 person-years, with higher mortality in counties with greater social vulnerability. AAMRs for cancer and CVD were also significantly greater in counties with the highest SVIs. However, the proportional increase in mortality between the highest and lowest SVI counties was greater for comorbid cancer and CVD than for either cancer or CVD alone. Adults <45 years of age, women, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics had the highest relative increase in comorbid cancer and CVD mortality between the fourth and first SVI quartiles, without significant urban-rural differences. Conclusions: Comorbid cancer and CVD mortality increased in counties with higher social vulnerability. Improved education, resource allocation, and targeted public health interventions are needed to address inequities in cardio-oncology.Item Increased risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with COVID-19 pneumonia in comparison to influenza pneumonia: insights from the National Inpatient Sample database(AME, 2024) Raj, Kavin; Majeed, Harris; Chandna, Sanya; Chitkara, Akshit; Sheikh, Abu Baker; Kumar, Ashish; Gangu, Karthik; Pillai, Keerthana Jyotheeswara; Agrawal, Ankit; Sadashiv, Santhosh K.; Kalra, Ankur; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily a respiratory virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, induces a hypercoagulable state. Previous studies comparing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with influenza pneumonia revealed a higher risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, these studies have not adequately accounted for the severity and acuity of the presenting viral pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective study, we rigorously adjusted for critical illness using a nationally representative dataset to investigate whether COVID-19 pneumonia is independently linked to a higher risk of PE and DVT. Results: After comprehensive multivariate adjustment, our findings demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia maintained significantly higher odds of developing acute inpatient PE [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16-2.86; P<0.01] and DVT (aOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.41-1.96; P<0.01) during the early pandemic compared to patients with influenza pneumonia. Furthermore, we identified congenital heart disease and malnutrition as novel risk factors for acute PE in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the higher prevalence of acute inpatient PE over DVT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may support a "thrombus in situ" mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-mediated pulmonary thrombosis. Consequently, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for PE, even in the absence of DVT, among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and should follow evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management.