Browsing by Author "Johnson, Rachel"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of a Driving Decision Aid on Decisional Conflict Among Older Adult Drivers and their Study Partners
    (Oxford University Press, 2022-12-20) Fowler, Nicole; Johnson, Rachel; Peterson, Ryan; Schroeder, Matthew; DiGuiseppi, Carolyn; Han, Duke; Hill, Linda; Betz, Marian; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Forty-four million US licensed drivers are ≥65 years old and at higher crash risk. Decision-making about stopping or continuing driving is difficult and often involves family and friends. This study examines if decision conflict about changing driving habits is associated between older adult drivers and their study partners (SPs) (i.e., family member or friend). Data were from a multi-site trial assessing a driving decision aid. Decision conflict about stopping or continuing driving for drivers and their SPs were measured with the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS). Dyadic associations between drivers’ and SPs’ DCS scores pre- and post-decision aid implementation were analyzed using an actor-partner interdependence model. Among 228 driver-SP dyads, driver mean (SD) age was 77.1 (5.1) years; 50.0% female; 98.7% non-Hispanic; 94.7% white; and 97.8% urban-dwelling. SPs mean age was 66.1 years (13.9); 65.8% female; 95.6% non-Hispanic; 92.1% white; and commonly the driver’s spouse (54.6%) or adult child (21.1%). Most drivers (71.7%) and SPs (63.3%) had baseline DCS scores < 25 (drivers mean 18.5 (SD 12.3); SPs 20.5 (16.8)), suggesting low decision conflict. DCS was correlated within dyads at baseline (r=0.18, p < 0.01), and baseline DCS was associated with post-decision aid DCS (p < 0.001 for SPs [β=0.73] and drivers [β=0.73]). While SPs’ baseline DCS was not associated with drivers’ post-decision aid DCS, drivers’ baseline DCS and SPs’ post-decision DCS were (β=0.10; p=0.036). Higher decision conflict about driving felt by older drivers is frequently shared by their SPs, in whom decision conflict may persist even after a driving decision aid intervention.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    "Is it Time to Stop Driving?" A Randomized Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Older Drivers
    (Oxford University Press, 2022-12-20) Omeragic, Faris; Meador, Lauren; Fowler, Nicole; Johnson, Rachel; Boland, Elizabeth; Peterson, Ryan; Betz, Marian; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The decision to stop or continue driving can be challenging for older adults. In a prospective two-arm randomized trial, we sought to test whether an online driving decision aid (DDA) would improve decision quality. We recruited 301 English-speaking licensed drivers, age ≥70 years, without significant cognitive impairment but with ≥1 diagnosis associated with increased likelihood of driving cessation, from clinics associated with study sites in three states. They were randomized to view 1) the online Healthwise® DDA for older adults addressing “Is it time to stop driving?”; or 2) a control condition of web-based information. Our primary outcome was decision conflict as estimated by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS; lower scores indicate higher quality). Secondary outcomes were knowledge and decision self-efficacy about driving decisions. We examined differences in post-randomization outcomes by study arm using generalized linear mixed-effects models with adjustment for site and pre-randomization scores. Intervention participants had a lower mean DCS score (12.3 DDA vs 15.2 control; p=0.017) and a higher mean knowledge score (88.9 DDA vs 79.9 control; p=0.038); we found no difference between groups in self-efficacy scores. The DDA had high acceptability; 86.9% of those who viewed it said they would recommend it to others in similar situations.The online Healthwise® DDA decreased decision conflict and increased knowledge in this sample of English-speaking, older adults without significant cognitive impairment. Use of such resources in clinical or community settings may support older adults as they transition from driving to other forms of mobility.