Browsing by Author "Jiang, Ruixuan"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Burden and Risk Factors of Brain Metastases in Melanoma: A Systematic Literature Review
    (MDPI, 2022-12-12) Tan, Xiang-Lin; Le, Amy; Tang, Huilin; Brown, Madeline; Scherrer, Emilie; Han, Jiali; Jiang, Ruixuan; Diede, Scott J.; Shui, Irene M.; Epidemiology, School of Public Health
    Melanoma can frequently metastasize to the brain with severe consequences. However, variation of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) development among populations is not well studied, and underlying mechanisms and risk factors for MBM development are not consistently documented. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) including a total of 39 articles to evaluate the proportion of melanoma patients who are diagnosed with, or develop, brain metastases, and summarize the risk factors of MBM. The average proportion of MBM was calculated and weighted by the sample size of each study. Meta-analyses were conducted for the selected risk factors using a random-effects model. The proportion of MBM at diagnosis was 33% (975 with MBM out of 2948 patients) among patients with cutaneous melanoma (excluding acral) and 23% (651/2875) among patients with cutaneous mixed with other types of melanoma. The proportion at diagnosis was lower among populations with mucosal (9/96, 9%) or uveal (4/184, 2%) melanoma and among populations outside the United States and Europe. Meta-analysis demonstrated that male vs. female gender and left-sided tumors vs. right-sided were significantly associated with increased risk of melanoma brain metastases. These data may help clinicians to assess an individual patient's risk of developing melanoma brain metastases.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current Treatment Approaches and Global Consensus Guidelines for Brain Metastases in Melanoma
    (Frontiers Media, 2022-05-05) Tan, Xiang-Lin; Le, Amy; Lam, Fred C.; Scherrer, Emilie; Kerr, Robert G.; Lau, Anthony C.; Han, Jiali; Jiang, Ruixuan; Diede, Scott J.; Shui, Irene M.; Graduate Medical Education, School of Medicine
    Background: Up to 60% of melanoma patients develop melanoma brain metastases (MBM), which traditionally have a poor diagnosis. Current treatment strategies include immunotherapies (IO), targeted therapies (TT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but there is considerable heterogeneity across worldwide consensus guidelines. Objective: To summarize current treatments and compare worldwide guidelines for the treatment of MBM. Methods: Review of global consensus treatment guidelines for MBM patients. Results: Substantial evidence supported that concurrent IO or TT plus SRS improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Guidelines are inconsistent with regards to recommendations for surgical resection of MBM, since surgical resection of symptomatic lesions alleviates neurological symptoms but does not improve OS. Whole-brain radiation therapy is not recommended by all guidelines due to negative effects on neurocognition but can be offered in rare palliative scenarios. Conclusion: Worldwide consensus guidelines consistently recommend up-front combination IO or TT with or without SRS for the treatment of MBM.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for melanoma brain metastases
    (Frontiers, 2022-12-07) Tan, Xiang-Lin;  Le, Amy; Scherrer, Emilie; Tang, Huilin; Kiehl, Nick; Han, Jiali; Jiang, Ruixuan; Diede, Scott J.; Shui, Irene M.; Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Background: More than 60% of all stage IV melanoma patients develop brain metastases, while melanoma brain metastases (MBM) is historically difficult to treat with poor prognosis. Objectives: To summarize clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in MBM patients. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, and a literature search for relevant studies was performed on November 1, 2020. Weighted average of median overall survival (OS) was calculated by treatments. The random-effects model in conducting meta-analyses was applied. Results: A total of 41 observational studies and 12 clinical trials with our clinical outcomes of interest, and 31 observational studies addressing prognostic factors were selected. The most common treatments for MBM were immunotherapy (IO), MAP kinase inhibitor (MAPKi), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), SRS+MAPKi, and SRS+IO, with median OS from treatment start of 7.2, 8.6, 7.3, 7.3, and 14.1 months, respectively. Improved OS was observed for IO and SRS with the addition of IO and/or MAPKi, compared to no IO and SRS alone, respectively. Several prognostic factors were found to be significantly associated with OS in MBM. Conclusion: This study summarizes pertinent information regarding clinical outcomes and the association between patient characteristics and MBM prognosis.