Browsing by Author "Jain, Supriya S."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinically Suspected Myocarditis Temporally Related to COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents and Young Adults: Suspected Myocarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination
    (AHA, 2022-02) Truong, Dongngan T.; Dionne, Audrey; Muniz, Juan Carlos; McHugh, Kimberly E.; Portman, Michael A.; Lambert, Linda M.; Thacker, Deepika; Elias, Matthew D.; Li, Jennifer S.; Toro-Salazar, Olga H.; Anderson, Brett R.; Atz, Andrew M.; Bohun, C. Monique; Campbell, M. Jay; Chrisant, Maryanne; D’Addese, Laura; Dummer, Kirsten B.; Forsha, Daniel; Frank, Lowell H.; Frosch, Olivia H.; Gelehrter, Sarah K.; Giglia, Therese M.; Hebson, Camden; Jain, Supriya S.; Johnston, Pace; Krishnan, Anita; Lombardi, Kristin C.; McCrindle, Brian W.; Mitchell, Elizabeth C.; Miyata, Koichi; Mizzi, Trent; Parker, Robert M.; Patel, Jyoti K.; Ronai, Christina; Sabati, Arash A.; Schauer, Jenna; Sexson Tejtel, S. Kristen; Shea, J. Ryan; Shekerdemian, Lara S.; Srivastava, Shubhika; Votava-Smith, Jodie K.; White, Sarah; Newburger, Jane W.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Understanding the clinical course and short-term outcomes of suspected myocarditis after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has important public health implications in the decision to vaccinate youth. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients <21 years old presenting before July 4, 2021, with suspected myocarditis within 30 days of COVID-19 vaccination. Lake Louise criteria were used for cardiac MRI findings. Myocarditis cases were classified as confirmed or probable on the basis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Results: We report on 139 adolescents and young adults with 140 episodes of suspected myocarditis (49 confirmed, 91 probable) at 26 centers. Most patients were male (n=126, 90.6%) and White (n=92, 66.2%); 29 (20.9%) were Hispanic; and the median age was 15.8 years (range, 12.1–20.3; interquartile range [IQR], 14.5–17.0). Suspected myocarditis occurred in 136 patients (97.8%) after the mRNA vaccine, with 131 (94.2%) after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine; 128 (91.4%) occurred after the second dose. Symptoms started at a median of 2 days (range, 0–22; IQR, 1–3) after vaccination. The most common symptom was chest pain (99.3%). Patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (81.3%), intravenous immunoglobulin (21.6%), glucocorticoids (21.6%), colchicine (7.9%), or no anti-inflammatory therapies (8.6%). Twenty-six patients (18.7%) were in the intensive care unit, 2 were treated with inotropic/vasoactive support, and none required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or died. Median hospital stay was 2 days (range, 0–10; IQR, 2–3). All patients had elevated troponin I (n=111, 8.12 ng/mL; IQR, 3.50–15.90) or T (n=28, 0.61 ng/mL; IQR, 0.25–1.30); 69.8% had abnormal ECGs and arrhythmias (7 with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia); and 18.7% had left ventricular ejection fraction <55% on echocardiogram. Of 97 patients who underwent cardiac MRI at a median 5 days (range, 0–88; IQR, 3–17) from symptom onset, 75 (77.3%) had abnormal findings: 74 (76.3%) had late gadolinium enhancement, 54 (55.7%) had myocardial edema, and 49 (50.5%) met Lake Louise criteria. Among 26 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <55% on echocardiogram, all with follow-up had normalized function (n=25). Conclusions: Most cases of suspected COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis occurring in persons <21 years have a mild clinical course with rapid resolution of symptoms. Abnormal findings on cardiac MRI were frequent. Future studies should evaluate risk factors, mechanisms, and long-term outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Design and implementation of multicenter pediatric and congenital studies with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Big data in smaller bodies
    (Elsevier, 2024) DiLorenzo, Michael P.; Lee, Simon; Rathod, Rahul H.; Raimondi, Francesca; Farooqi, Kanwal M.; Jain, Supriya S.; Samyn, Margaret M.; Johnson, Tiffanie R.; Olivieri, Laura J.; Fogel, Mark A.; Lai, Wyman W.; Renella, Pierangelo; Powell, Andrew J.; Buddhe, Sujatha; Stafford, Caitlin; Johnson, Jason N.; Helbing, Willem A.; Pushparajah, Kuberan; Voges, Inga; Muthurangu, Vivek; Miles, Kimberley G.; Greil, Gerald; McMahon, Colin J.; Slesnick, Timothy C.; Fonseca, Brian M.; Morris, Shaine A.; Soslow, Jonathan H.; Grosse-Wortmann, Lars; Beroukhim, Rebecca S.; Grotenhuis, Heynric B.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the reference standard for quantitative and qualitative assessment of ventricular function, blood flow, and myocardial tissue characterization. There is a preponderance of large CMR studies and registries in adults; However, similarly powered studies are lacking for the pediatric and congenital heart disease (PCHD) population. To date, most CMR studies in children are limited to small single or multicenter studies, thereby limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. Within the PCHD CMR community, a collaborative effort has been successfully employed to recognize knowledge gaps with the aim to embolden the development and initiation of high-quality, large-scale multicenter research. In this publication, we highlight the underlying challenges and provide a practical guide toward the development of larger, multicenter initiatives focusing on PCHD populations, which can serve as a model for future multicenter efforts.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Infliximab versus second intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of resistant Kawasaki disease in the USA (KIDCARE): a randomised, multicentre comparative effectiveness trial
    (Elsevier, 2021-12) Burns, Jane C.; Roberts, Samantha C.; Tremoulet, Adriana H.; He, Feng; Printz, Beth F.; Ashouri, Negar; Jain, Supriya S.; Michalik, David E.; Sharma, Kavita; Truong, Dongngan T.; Wood, James B.; Kim, Katherine K.; Jain, Sonia; Anand, Vikram; Anderson, Marsha; Ang, Jocelyn; Ansusinha, Emily; Arditi, Moshe; Bartlett, Allison; Baker, Annette; Chatterjee, Archana; DeBiasi, Roberta; De Ferranti, Sarah; Dekker, Cornelia; DeZure, Chandani; Dominguez, Samuel; Erdem, Guliz; Halasa, Natasha; Harahsheh, Ashraf S.; Hite, Michelle; Jaggi, Preeti; Jone, Pei-Ni; Jones, Jessica; Kaushik, Neeru; Kumar, Madan; Kurio, Gregory; Lloyd, David; Manaloor, John; McNelis, Amy; Nadipuram, Santhosh; Newburger, Jane; Newcomer, Charles; Perkins, Tiffany; Portman, Michael; Romero, José R.; Rometo, Allison; Ronis, Tova; Rosenkranz, Margalit; Rowley, Anne; Samuy, Nichole; Scalici, Paul; Schuster, Jennifer; Sexson Tejtel, S. Kristen; Simonsen, Kari; Szmuszkovicz, Jacqueline; Yeh, Sylvia; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background Although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is effective therapy for Kawasaki disease, 10–20% of patients have recrudescent fever as a sign of persistent inflammation and require additional treatment. We aimed to compare infliximab with a second infusion of IVIG for treatment of resistant Kawasaki disease. Methods In this multicentre comparative effectiveness trial, patients (aged 4 weeks to 17 years) with IVIG resistant Kawasaki disease and fever at least 36 h after completion of their first IVIG infusion were recruited from 30 hospitals across the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to second IVIG (2 g/kg over 8–12 h) or intravenous infliximab (10 mg/kg over 2 h without premedication), by using a randomly permuted block randomisation design with block size of two or four. Patients with fever 24 h to 7 days following completion of first study treatment crossed over to receive the other study treatment. The primary outcome measure was resolution of fever at 24 h after initiation of study treatment with no recurrence of fever attributed to Kawasaki disease within 7 days post-discharge. Secondary outcome measures included duration of fever from enrolment, duration of hospitalisation after randomisation, and changes in markers of inflammation and coronary artery Z score. Efficacy was analysed in participants who received treatment and had available outcome values. Safety was analysed in all randomised patients who did not withdraw consent. This clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03065244. Findings Between March 1, 2017, and Aug 31, 2020, 105 patients were randomly assigned to treatment and 103 were included in the intention-to-treat population (54 in the infliximab group, 49 in the second IVIG group). Two patients randomised to infliximab did not receive allocated treatment. The primary outcome was met by 40 (77%) of 52 patients in the infliximab group and 25 (51%) of 49 patients in the second IVIG infusion group (odds ratio 0·31, 95% CI 0·13–0·73, p=0·0076). 31 patients with fever beyond 24 h received crossover treatment: nine (17%) in the infliximab group received second IVIG and 22 (45%) in second IVIG group received infliximab (p=0·0024). Three patients randomly assigned to infliximab and two to second IVIG with fever beyond 24h did not receive crossover treatment. Mean fever days from enrolment was 1·5 (SD 1·4) for the infliximab group and 2·5 (2·5) for the second IVIG group (p=0·014). Mean hospital stay was 3·2 days (2·1) for the infliximab group and 4·5 days (2·5) for the second IVIG group (p<0·001). There was no difference between treatment groups for markers of inflammation or coronary artery outcome. 24 (44%) of 54 patients in the infliximab group and 33 (67%) of 49 in the second IVIG group had at least one adverse event. A drop in haemoglobin concentration of at least 2g/dL was seen in 19 (33%) of 58 patients who received IVIG as either their first or second study treatment (three of whom required transfusion) and in three (7%) of 43 who received only infliximab (none required transfusion; p=0·0028). Haemolytic anaemia was the only serious adverse events deemed definitely or probably related to study treatment, and was reported in nine (15%) of 58 patients who received IVIG as either their first or second study treatment and none who received infliximab only. Interpretation Infliximab is a safe, well tolerated, and effective treatment for patients with IVIG resistant Kawasaki disease, and results in shorter duration of fever, reduced need for additional therapy, less severe anaemia, and shorter hospitalisation compared with second IVIG infusion.