Browsing by Author "Jacobsen, Laura"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparisons of Metabolic Measures to Predict T1D vs Detect a Preventive Treatment Effect in High-Risk Individuals
    (Oxford University Press, 2024) Sims, Emily K.; Cuthbertson, David; Jacobsen, Laura; Ismail, Heba M.; Nathan, Brandon M.; Herold, Kevan C.; Redondo, Maria J.; Sosenko, Jay; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Context: Metabolic measures are frequently used to predict type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to understand effects of disease-modifying therapies. Objective: Compare metabolic endpoints for their ability to detect preventive treatment effects and predict T1D. Methods: Six-month changes in metabolic endpoints were assessed for (1) detecting treatment effects by comparing placebo and treatment arms from the randomized controlled teplizumab prevention trial, a multicenter clinical trial investigating 14-day intravenous teplizumab infusion and (2) predicting T1D in the TrialNet Pathway to Prevention natural history study. For each metabolic measure, t-Values from t tests for detecting a treatment effect were compared with chi-square values from proportional hazards regression for predicting T1D. Participants in the teplizumab prevention trial and participants in the Pathway to Prevention study selected with the same inclusion criteria used for the teplizumab trial were studied. Results: Six-month changes in glucose-based endpoints predicted diabetes better than C-peptide-based endpoints, yet the latter were better at detecting a teplizumab effect. Combined measures of glucose and C-peptide were more balanced than measures of glucose alone or C-peptide alone for predicting diabetes and detecting a teplizumab effect. Conclusion: The capacity of a metabolic endpoint to detect a treatment effect does not necessarily correspond to its accuracy for predicting T1D. However, combined glucose and C-peptide endpoints appear to be effective for both predicting diabetes and detecting a response to immunotherapy. These findings suggest that combined glucose and C-peptide endpoints should be incorporated into the design of future T1D prevention trials.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Index60 Identifies Individuals at Appreciable Risk for Stage 3 Among an Autoantibody-Positive Population With Normal 2-Hour Glucose Levels: Implications for Current Staging Criteria of Type 1 Diabetes
    (American Diabetes Association, 2022) Nathan, Brandon M.; Redondo, Maria J.; Ismail, Heba; Jacobsen, Laura; Sims, Emily K.; Palmer, Jerry; Skyler, Jay; Bocchino, Laura; Geyer, Susan; Sosenko, Jay M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objective: We assessed whether Index60, a composite measure of fasting C-peptide, 60-min C-peptide, and 60-min glucose, could improve the metabolic staging of type 1 diabetes for progression to clinical disease (stage 3) among autoantibody-positive (Ab+) individuals with normal 2-h glucose values (<140 mg/dL). Research design and methods: We analyzed 3,058 Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Pathway to Prevention participants with 2-h glucose <140 mg/dL and Index60 <1.00 values from baseline oral glucose tolerance tests. Characteristics associated with type 1 diabetes (younger age, greater Ab+, higher HLA DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 prevalence, and lower C-peptide) were compared among four mutually exclusive groups: top 2-h glucose quartile only (HI-2HGLU), top Index60 quartile only (HI-IND60), both top quartiles (HI-BOTH), and neither top quartile (LO-BOTH). Additionally, within the 2-h glucose distribution of <140 mg/dL and separately within the Index60 <1.00 distribution, comparisons were made between those above or below the medians. Results: HI-IND60 and HI-BOTH were younger, with greater frequency of more than two Ab+, and lower C-peptide levels, than either HI-2HGLU or LO-BOTH (all P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence for stage 3 was greater for HI-IND60 and HI-BOTH than for either HI-2HGLU or LO-BOTH (all P < 0.001). Those with Index60 values above the median were younger and had higher frequency of two or more Ab+ (P < 0.001) and DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 prevalence (P < 0.001) and lower area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide levels (P < 0.001) than those below. Those above the 2-h glucose median had higher AUC C-peptide levels (P < 0.001), but otherwise did not differ from those below. Conclusions: Index60 identifies individuals with characteristics of type 1 diabetes at appreciable risk for progression who would otherwise be missed by 2-h glucose staging criteria.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Introducing the Endotype Concept to Address the Challenge of Disease Heterogeneity in Type 1 Diabetes
    (American Diabetes Association, 2020-01) Battaglia, Manuela; Ahmed, Simi; Anderson, Mark S.; Atkinson, Mark A.; Becker, Dorothy; Bingley, Polly J.; Bosi, Emanuele; Brusko, Todd M.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Evans-Molina, Carmella; Gitelman, Stephen E.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Gottlieb, Peter A.; Herold, Kevan C.; Hessner, Martin J.; Knip, Mikael; Jacobsen, Laura; Krischer, Jeffrey P.; Long, S. Alice; Lundgren, Markus; McKinney, Eoin F.; Morgan, Noel G.; Oram, Richard A.; Pastinen, Tomi; Peters, Michael C.; Petrelli, Alessandra; Qian, Xiaoning; Redondo, Maria J.; Roep, Bart O.; Schatz, Desmond; Skibinski, David; Peakman, Mark; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The clinical diagnosis of new-onset type 1 diabetes has, for many years, been considered relatively straightforward. Recently, however, there is increasing awareness that within this single clinical phenotype exists considerable heterogeneity: disease onset spans the complete age range; genetic susceptibility is complex; rates of progression differ markedly, as does insulin secretory capacity; and complication rates, glycemic control, and therapeutic intervention efficacy vary widely. Mechanistic and immunopathological studies typically show considerable patchiness across subjects, undermining conclusions regarding disease pathways. Without better understanding, type 1 diabetes heterogeneity represents a major barrier both to deciphering pathogenesis and to the translational effort of designing, conducting, and interpreting clinical trials of disease-modifying agents. This realization comes during a period of unprecedented change in clinical medicine, with increasing emphasis on greater individualization and precision. For complex disorders such as type 1 diabetes, the option of maintaining the "single disease" approach appears untenable, as does the notion of individualizing each single patient's care, obliging us to conceptualize type 1 diabetes less in terms of phenotypes (observable characteristics) and more in terms of disease endotypes (underlying biological mechanisms). Here, we provide our view on an approach to dissect heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. Using lessons from other diseases and the data gathered to date, we aim to delineate a roadmap through which the field can incorporate the endotype concept into laboratory and clinical practice. We predict that such an effort will accelerate the implementation of precision medicine and has the potential for impact on our approach to translational research, trial design, and clinical management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: Screening, Staging, and Strategies to Preserve Beta-Cell Function in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
    (Karger, 2024) Haller, Michael J.; Bell, Kirstine J.; Besser, Rachel E. J.; Casteels, Kristina; Couper, Jenny J.; Craig, Maria E.; Larsson, Helena Elding; Jacobsen, Laura; Lange, Karin; Oron, Tal; Sims, Emily K.; Speake, Cate; Tosur, Mustafa; Ulivi, Francesca; Ziegler, Anette-G.; Wherrett, Diane K.; Marcovecchio, M. Loredana; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) guidelines represent a rich repository that serves as the only comprehensive set of clinical recommendations for children, adolescents, and young adults living with diabetes worldwide. This guideline serves as an update to the 2022 ISPAD consensus guideline on staging for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Key additions include an evidence-based summary of recommendations for screening for risk of T1D and monitoring those with early-stage T1D. In addition, a review of clinical trials designed to delay progression to Stage 3 T1D and efforts seeking to preserve beta-cell function in those with Stage 3 T1D are included. Lastly, opportunities and challenges associated with the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of teplizumab as an immunotherapy to delay progression are discussed. The International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) guidelines represent a rich repository that serves as the only comprehensive set of clinical recommendations for children, adolescents, and young adults living with diabetes worldwide. This guideline serves as an update to the 2022 ISPAD consensus guideline on staging for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Key additions include an evidence-based summary of recommendations for screening for risk of T1D and monitoring those with early-stage T1D. In addition, a review of clinical trials designed to delay progression to Stage 3 T1D and efforts seeking to preserve beta-cell function in those with Stage 3 T1D are included. Lastly, opportunities and challenges associated with the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of teplizumab as an immunotherapy to delay progression are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Disposition Index in Autoantibody-Positive Individuals at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes
    (American Diabetes Association, 2025) Ismail, Heba M.; Cuthbertson, David; Galderisi, Alfonso; Libman, Ingrid; Jacobsen, Laura; Moran, Antoinette; Petrelli, Alessandra; Atkinson, Mark; Redondo, Maria J.; Hannon, Tamara; Mather, Kieren J.; Sosenko, Jay M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Since little is known about the disposition index (DI) in autoantibody-positive individuals, we have assessed whether DI has a similar association between insulin secretion and sensitivity to the association observed in other populations. In TrialNet Pathway to Prevention (TNPTP; n = 6,620) and Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1; n = 704) study participants, two secretion-sensitivity pairs, each representing a DI, were analyzed cross-sectionally at baseline: area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide/AUC glucose (AUC ratio) and Matsuda index (MI) from TNPTP oral glucose tolerance tests (oral DI), first-phase insulin response (FPIR), and 1 / fasting insulin (1/FI) from DPT-1 from intravenous glucose tolerance tests (DI). Participants were followed for progression to type 1 diabetes (T1D). Within the normal and diabetes glucose ranges, associations of AUC ratio with MI in TNPTP and FPIR with 1/FI in DPT-1 had inverse curvilinear patterns with convexities to the origin. After logarithmic transformations to linearize the secretion and sensitivity measures, the inverse slope was steeper for the diabetes range (P < 0.0001). In a Cox regression model including the AUC ratio and MI as variables and another model including FPIR and 1/FI, the interaction terms of secretion × sensitivity (i.e., the DI/oral DI) predicted stage 3 T1D in both (P < 0.0001). The DI remained significantly predictive (P < 0.0001) when the DPT-1 risk score was added as a covariate in regression models. In autoantibody-positive populations, insulin secretion is inversely related to sensitivity in a quasi-hyperbolic relationship in normal and diabetes ranges of glucose. The DI can be represented by a statistical and physiologic interaction between secretion and sensitivity that is predictive of stage 3 T1D. Article highlights: Little is known about the relationship between secretion and sensitivity in individuals at risk for type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study examined the relationship between secretion and sensitivity in antibody-positive relatives at risk for T1D and the predictive value of the disposition index (DI) as a measure of β-cell function. Secretion and sensitivity measures in two independent antibody-positive populations at risk for T1D had an inverse relationship across different glycemic ranges. The DI using different measures of secretion and sensitivity was predictive of T1D. The DI is a useful biomarker of β-cell function in individuals at risk for T1D.