ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Jackson, Eric M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Measures of Intracranial Injury Size Do Not Improve Clinical Decision Making for Children With Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Intracranial Injuries
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Greenberg, Jacob K.; Olsen, Margaret A.; Johnson, Gabrielle W.; Ahluwalia, Ranbir; Hill, Madelyn; Hale, Andrew T.; Belal, Ahmed; Baygani, Shawyon; Foraker, Randi E.; Carpenter, Christopher R.; Ackerman, Laurie L.; Noje, Corina; Jackson, Eric M.; Burns, Erin; Sayama, Christina M.; Selden, Nathan R.; Vachhrajani, Shobhan; Shannon, Chevis N.; Kuppermann, Nathan; Limbrick, David D., Jr.; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: When evaluating children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and intracranial injuries (ICIs), neurosurgeons intuitively consider injury size. However, the extent to which such measures (eg, hematoma size) improve risk prediction compared with the kids intracranial injury decision support tool for traumatic brain injury (KIIDS-TBI) model, which only includes the presence/absence of imaging findings, remains unknown. Objective: To determine the extent to which measures of injury size improve risk prediction for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and ICIs. Methods: We included children ≤18 years who presented to 1 of the 5 centers within 24 hours of TBI, had Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13 to 15, and had ICI on neuroimaging. The data set was split into training (n = 1126) and testing (n = 374) cohorts. We used generalized linear modeling (GLM) and recursive partitioning (RP) to predict the composite of neurosurgery, intubation >24 hours, or death because of TBI. Each model's sensitivity/specificity was compared with the validated KIIDS-TBI model across 3 decision-making risk cutoffs (<1%, <3%, and <5% predicted risk). Results: The GLM and RP models included similar imaging variables (eg, epidural hematoma size) while the GLM model incorporated additional clinical predictors (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale score). The GLM (76%-90%) and RP (79%-87%) models showed similar specificity across all risk cutoffs, but the GLM model had higher sensitivity (89%-96% for GLM; 89% for RP). By comparison, the KIIDS-TBI model had slightly higher sensitivity (93%-100%) but lower specificity (27%-82%). Conclusion: Although measures of ICI size have clear intuitive value, the tradeoff between higher specificity and lower sensitivity does not support the addition of such information to the KIIDS-TBI model.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Occipital-Cervical Fusion and Ventral Decompression in the Surgical Management of Chiari-1 Malformation and Syringomyelia: Analysis of Data From the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2021-01-13) CreveCoeur, Travis S.; Yahanda, Alexander T.; Maher, Cormac O.; Johnson, Gabrielle W.; Ackerman, Laurie L.; Adelson, P. David; Ahmed, Raheel; Albert, Gregory W.; Aldana, Phillipp R.; Alden, Tord D.; Anderson, Richard C.E.; Baird, Lissa; Bauer, David F.; Bierbrauer, Karin S.; Brockmeyer, Douglas L.; Chern, Joshua J.; Couture, Daniel E.; Daniels, David J.; Dauser, Robert C.; Durham, Susan R.; Ellenbogen, Richard G.; Eskandari, Ramin; Fuchs, Herbert E.; George, Timothy M.; Grant, Gerald A.; Graupman, Patrick C.; Greene, Stephanie; Greenfield, Jeffrey P.; Gross, Naina L.; Guillaume, Daniel J.; Haller, Gabe; Hankinson, Todd C.; Heuer, Gregory G.; Iantosca, Mark; Iskandar, Bermans J.; Jackson, Eric M.; Jea, Andrew H.; Johnston, James M.; Keating, Robert F.; Kelly, Michael P.; Khan, Nickalus; Krieger, Mark D.; Leonard, Jeffrey R.; Mangano, Francesco T.; Mapstone, Timothy B.; McComb, J. Gordon; Menezes, Arnold H.; Muhlbauer, Michael; Oakes, W. Jerry; Olavarria, Greg; O’Neill, Brent R.; Park, Tae Sung; Ragheb, John; Selden, Nathan R.; Shah, Manish N.; Shannon, Chevis; Shimony, Joshua S.; Smith, Jodi; Smyth, Matthew D.; Stone, Scellig S.D.; Strahle, Jennifer M.; Tamber, Mandeep S.; Torner, James C.; Tuite, Gerald F.; Wait, Scott D.; Wellons, John C., III.; Whitehead, William E.; Limbrick, David D., Jr.; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Occipital-cervical fusion (OCF) and ventral decompression (VD) may be used in the treatment of pediatric Chiari-1 malformation (CM-1) with syringomyelia (SM) as adjuncts to posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for complex craniovertebral junction pathology. Objective: To examine factors influencing the use of OCF and OCF/VD in a multicenter cohort of pediatric CM-1 and SM subjects treated with PFD. Methods: The Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium registry was used to examine 637 subjects with cerebellar tonsillar ectopia ≥ 5 mm, syrinx diameter ≥ 3 mm, and at least 1 yr of follow-up after their index PFD. Comparisons were made between subjects who received PFD alone and those with PFD + OCF or PFD + OCF/VD. Results: All 637 patients underwent PFD, 505 (79.2%) with and 132 (20.8%) without duraplasty. A total of 12 subjects went on to have OCF at some point in their management (PFD + OCF), whereas 4 had OCF and VD (PFD + OCF/VD). Of those with complete data, a history of platybasia (3/10, P = .011), Klippel-Feil (2/10, P = .015), and basilar invagination (3/12, P < .001) were increased within the OCF group, whereas only basilar invagination (1/4, P < .001) was increased in the OCF/VD group. Clivo-axial angle (CXA) was significantly lower for both OCF (128.8 ± 15.3°, P = .008) and OCF/VD (115.0 ± 11.6°, P = .025) groups when compared to PFD-only group (145.3 ± 12.7°). pB-C2 did not differ among groups. Conclusion: Although PFD alone is adequate for treating the vast majority of CM-1/SM patients, OCF or OCF/VD may be occasionally utilized. Cranial base and spine pathologies and CXA may provide insight into the need for OCF and/or OCF/VD.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University