Browsing by Author "Jaboin, Jerry J."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 16
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A National Cancer Database analysis of the patterns of care for meningeal melanocytoma(Future Science Group, 2021) Tep, Amanda C.; Kelly, Patrick D.; Scarpelli, Daphne B.; Bergue, Bailey; McClelland, Shearwood, III; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineAim: To evaluate demographics, treatment patterns, radiotherapy utilization and patient outcomes in meningeal melanocytomas. Materials & methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for meningeal melanocytomas diagnosed in 2002-2016. The effects of demographic, clinical and treatment variables were determined via Kaplan-Meier log-rank and Cox regression analyses. Results: The median and 5-year overall survival were 57.46 months and 48%, respectively. Patients earning ≥$48K showed improved survival (p = 0.0319). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were utilized in 37.7 and 9% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Income significantly affected survival. Surgery remains the mainstay approach. Radiotherapy was delivered in more than one-third of patients but did not impact survival. However, further analyses were limited by poor treatment modality information in the database.Item Analysis of pre-residency research productivity, dual degree status, and gender distribution of underrepresented minorities among a current United States radiation oncology junior resident class(Elsevier, 2019-04-05) McClelland, Shearwood, III; Woodhouse, Kristina D.; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Zellars, Richard C.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineBackground: Among the most competitive medical subspecialties, representation of underrepresented minorities (African-American race and/or Hispanic ethnicity) among resident trainees has historically been low compared to their United States Census general population representation. Research productivity and dual degree status may impact residency applicant competitiveness. To date, such an analysis has yet to be performed in Radiation Oncology. Methods: A list of radiation oncology residents from the graduating class of 2022 was obtained through internet searches. Demographics included were gender and dual degree status. Research productivity was calculated using the number of pre-residency peer-reviewed publications (PRP). Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 179 residents evaluated from the 2022 class, eleven (6.1%) were underrepresented minorities. Compared to the remainder of the class, underrepresented minorities had a lower proportion of men (63.6% versus 69.3%), a higher proportion of dual degrees (45.5% versus 28.6%), and a lower proportion of MD-PhD degrees (9.1% versus 17.2%). Underrepresented minorities had a higher proportion of residents with at least two PRP (72.7% versus 57.1%) and a lower proportion of residents with no PRP (18.2% versus 24.4%). None of these differences reached statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Underrepresented minorities were comparable to the remainder of their Radiation Oncology resident class regarding gender distribution, dual degrees status, and likelihood of having at least two peer-reviewed publications cited in PubMed during the calendar year of residency application. Further studies will be needed to determine how these findings translate into future scholarly activity and post-graduate career choice.Item Gender-based analysis of pre-residency research productivity among a current United States radiation oncology resident class(AME, 2021) McClelland, Shearwood, III; Murphy, Blair; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Zellars, Richard C.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineBackground: The increasing proportion of women in medicine has not been adequately reflected in the gender distribution of radiation oncology residents. The presence of at least one pre-residency peer-reviewed publication (PRP) has been associated with radiation oncology resident choice of academic over private practice career, with no significant gender difference in the likelihood of having a PRP (McClelland et al., 2017). We sought to pursue a gender-based analysis of PRP productivity in a current junior resident class. Methods: A list of radiation oncology residents from the graduating class of 2022 (PGY-2 academic year of 2018-2019) was obtained through internet investigation. Research productivity was calculated using PRP number, defined as the number of a resident's publications listed in PubMed (pubmed.gov) through the calendar year of residency application (2016 for this class). Results: Of 195 residents examined from the 2022 class, 61 (31%) were women, representing a nine percent increase from the resident class of 2016. Four-fifths of women had 1+ PRP, 31% had dual degrees, and 18% had a PhD. These percentages were comparable to their male counterparts, 73% with 1+ PRP, 28% with dual degrees, and 15% with a PhD. There were no statistically significant differences by gender in any of these benchmarks. Conclusions: While slower than the overall trend of increased female representation in medicine, the proportion of women in radiation oncology residency has increased by 0.9-1.5% annually over a recent six-year span. There remain no significant differences in PRP productivity, dual degree status, or PhD status by gender.Item Impact of hospital volume on mortality for brain metastases treated with radiation(Elsevier, 2021-08-12) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Degnin, Catherine; Chen, Yiyi; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineBackground: The impact of hospital volume on cancer patient survival has been demonstrated in the surgical literature, but sparsely for patients receiving radiation therapy (RT). This analysis addresses the impact of hospital volume on patients receiving RT for the most common central nervous system tumor: brain metastases. Materials and methods: Analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2015 for patients with metastatic brain disease from lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer requiring RT. Hospital volume was stratified as high-volume (≥ 12 brain RT/year), moderate (5-11 RT/year), and low (< 5 RT/year). The effect of hospital volume on overall survival was assessed using a multivariable Cox regression model. Results: A total of 18,841 patients [9479 (50.3%) men, 9362 (49.7%) women; median age 64 years] met the inclusion criteria. 16.7% were treated at high-volume hospitals, 36.5% at moderate-volume, and the remaining 46.8% at low-volume centers. Multivariable analysis revealed that mortality was significantly improved in high-volume centers (HR: 0.95, p = 0.039) compared with low-volume centers after accounting for multiple demographics including age, sex, race, insurance status, income, facility type, Charlson-Deyo score and receipt of palliative care. Conclusion: Hospitals performing 12 or more brain RT procedures per year have significantly improved survival in brain metastases patients receiving radiation as compared to lower volume hospitals. This finding, independent of additional demographics, indicates that the increased experience associated with increased volume may improve survival in this patient population.Item Impact of Travel Distance on Radiation Treatment Modality for Central Nervous System Disease(Medknow Publications, 2019-10) McClelland III, Shearwood; Mitin, Timur; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Ciporen, Jeremy N.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineBackground Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a popular alternative to conventional radiation therapy (RT) over the past 15 years. Unfortunately, the impact of patient distance from radiation treatment centers and utilization of SBRT versus conventional RT has been sparsely investigated. This report represents the first analysis of the impact of patient distance on radiation treatment modality for central nervous system (CNS) disease. Materials and Methods Since the inception of our RADIation oncology And Neuro-Surgery (RADIANS) multidisciplinary clinic at a community hospital in 2016, 27 patients have received either SBRT or conventional RT as their sole radiation treatment modality for CNS disease. Twenty-four (88.9%) presented with metastatic disease. Fisher’s exact test evaluated the relationship between patient residence from treatment (in miles) and radiation treatment modality received. Results Mean patient distance from our RADIANS clinic was 50.6 miles (median = 15.3). Twenty-one patients (77.8%) received SBRT; the remaining six received conventional RT. Mean patient distance from SBRT was 63.6 miles, and mean patient distance for conventional RT was 5.1 miles; this finding was statistically significant (p = 0.0433; 95% confidence interval = 1.9–115.1). Conclusion Our findings indicate that patients with CNS disease who receive SBRT over conventional RT are statistically more likely to reside further from treatment centers. This is similar to findings of national studies comparing proton versus photon treatment for pediatric solid malignancies. The results from our work have implications for neuro-oncology treatment and the development of community hospital-based clinic models similar to RADIANS in the future.Item Long-term stroke risk in meningioma patients treated with conventionally fractionated photon-based radiation therapy(Old City Publishing Group, 2019) McClelland, Shearwood, III; Mitin, Timur; Kubicky, Charlotte D.; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineItem Measure Twice: Promise of Liquid Biopsy in Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas(Elsevier, 2020-01-28) Dietz, Matthew S.; Beach, Catherine Z.; Barajas, Ramon; Parappilly, Michael S.; Sengupta, Sidharth K.; Baird, Lissa C.; Ciporen, Jeremy N.; Han, Seunggu J.; Loret de Mola, Rebecca; Cho, Yoon Jae; Nazemi, Kellie J.; McClelland, Shearwood, III; Wong, Melissa H.; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicinePurpose To review and critique the current state of liquid biopsy in pHGG. Materials and Methods Published literature was reviewed for articles related to liquid biopsy in pediatric glioma and adult glioma with a focus on high-grade gliomas. Results This review discusses the current state of liquid biomarkers of pHGG and their potential applications for liquid biopsy development. Conclusions While nascent, the progress toward identifying circulating analytes of pHGG primes the field of neuro-oncoogy for liquid biopsy development.Item National trends in management of adult myxopapillary ependymomas(Elsevier, 2020-03) Scarpelli, Daphne B.; Turina, Claire B.; Kelly, Patrick D.; Khudanyan, Arpine; Jaboin, Jerry J.; McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineMyxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) are WHO Grade I ependymomas that annually occur in 0.05–0.08 per 100,000 people. Surgical resection is the recommended first line therapy. Due to the rarity of the disease, there is a relatively poor understanding of the use of radiotherapy (RT) in managing this disease. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was analyzed for patterns of care for adult MPE diagnosed between 2002 and 2016. Of 753 qualifying cases, the majority of patients underwent resection (n = 617, 81.9%). A relatively small portion received RT (n = 103, 13.3%) with most receiving RT post-operatively (n = 98, 95.1%). The likelihood of patients to undergo resection and RT was associated with patient age at diagnosis (p = 0.002), tumor size (p < 0.001), and race (p = 0.017). Chemotherapy was not widely utilized (0.27% of patients). One limitation of our analysis is that there was no data on progression free survival (PFS), an important outcome given the high survival rate in this disease. Surgery remains the primary means to manage adult MPE. For spinal MPE, it is understood that gross total resection (GTR) should be attempted whenever possible as GTR has been associated with improved PFS in several studies. The impact of RT on overall survival (OS) is indeterminate given the 1.6% death rate in the cohort. Analyses of the impact of RT on PFS in a larger database would be beneficial for determining an algorithm for post-operative and definitive RT in this disease entity.Item Pediatric Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma: A National Database Inquiry on Current Treatment Approaches in the United States(Wiley, 2021) Scarpelli, Daphne B.; Yu, Yun; Tep, Amanda C.; Bergue, Bailey; Degnin, Catherine; Chen, Yiyi; McClelland, Shearwood, III; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineBackground: Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs) account for <1% of primary brain tumors, occurring predominantly in children and young adults. Surgical resection serves as the primary treatment for PXAs, while radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy protocols remain poorly defined. Aim: This study aims to determine current care patterns utilized for pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) diagnosed with PXAs and their effect on overall survival. Methods: The United States National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2004 and 2015 for pediatric patients (≤18 years) diagnosed with PXAs. Results: From the 224 qualifying patients, most patients proceeded with surgery only (78.1%), while 11.6% of patients received both adjuvant RT and chemotherapy. In the 2010-2015 cohort, patients with subtotal resection were associated with poorer prognosis than those with gross-total resection (hazard ratio = 17.44, 95% confidence interval = 2.10-144.90, p < .001). RT and chemotherapy recipients were similarly associated with poorer survival than those treated with surgery only, with p-values of <.001 and respective hazard ratios of 3.82 (95% confidence interval = 1.85-7.90) and 6.68 (95% confidence interval = 3.21-13.89). The key factors impacting the probability of RT delivery involved WHO grade (p < .001) and chemotherapy administration (p < .001). However, WHO grade alone did not significantly impact survival (p-value = .088). Conclusion: Maximally safe resection is the current treatment goal for patients with PXAs. RT and chemotherapy are poorly utilized but had a greater role in managing more aggressive cases of PXAs. Additional research focusing on the impact of adjuvant therapies on tumor progression is needed to better guide treatment decisions.Item Predictors of linear accelerator versus Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery use for brain metastases in the United States(Oxford Academic, 2019-11) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Degnin, Catherine; Chen, Yiyi; Watson, Gordon A.; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineINTRODUCTION Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is predominantly delivered via single-fraction Gamma Knife SRS (GKRS) or linear accelerator (LINAC) in 1–5 fractions. Predictors of SRS modality have been sparsely examined on a nationwide level. METHODS The 2010–2016 National Cancer Database identified brain metastases patients from non-small cell lung cancer throughout the United States (US) having undergone SRS. A multivariable logistic regression model characterized SRS receipt, adjusting for patient age, dose, geographic location of treatment, facility type, and distance from treatment facility. RESULTS A total of 1,760 patients received GKRS, while 1,064 patients received LINAC SRS. Treatment at non-academic facilities was associated with increased LINAC SRS receipt, most prominently in the Midwestern (OR= 6.23; p< 0.001), Northeastern (OR= 4.42; p< 0.001), and Southern US (OR= 1.96;p< 0.001). Administered doses of 18–19 Gy (OR= 1.42;p= 0.025), 20–21 Gy (OR= 1.82;p< 0.001), and 22–24 Gy (OR= 3.11;p< 0.001) were associated with increased LINAC SRS receipt, as was patient location within 20 miles of a radiation treatment facility (OR= 1.27;p= 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Despite Gamma Knife being more prominently used over LINAC for SRS, patients treated at non-academic facilities outside of the Western US were substantially more likely to receive LINAC over Gamma Knife. Patients located in the Midwest were 523% more likely, Northeast 342% more likely, and South 96% more likely to receive LINAC when treated at a non-academic facility. Increasing dose independently predicted LINAC over GKRS, indicating that smaller tumors – particularly those less than two centimeters (consistent with RTOG 90-05 recommendations) – are being treated with LINAC. Finally, patients residing in close proximity to a treatment center were 27% more likely to receive LINAC, likely indicative of the increased geographic accessibility of LINAC compared with GKRS. These findings should result in hypothesis-generating questions to further explore predictors of LINAC versus GKRS.