Browsing by Author "Inger, Lev"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Complex Transitions from Skilled Nursing Facility to Home: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives
    (Springer, 2021) Carnahan, Jennifer L.; Inger, Lev; Rawl, Susan M.; Iloabuchi, Tochukwu C.; Clark, Daniel O.; Callahan, Christopher M.; Torke, Alexia M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Patients who undergo the complex series of transitions from the hospital to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) back to home represent a unique patient population with multiple comorbidities and impaired functional abilities. The needs and outcomes of patients who are discharged from the hospital to SNF before returning home are understudied in care transitions scholarship. Objective: To study the patient and caregiver challenges and perspectives on transitions from the hospital to the SNF and back to home. Design: Between 48 h and 1 week after discharge from the SNF, semi-structured interviews were performed with a convenience sample of patients and caregivers in their homes. Within 1 to 2 weeks after the baseline interview, follow-up interviews were performed over the phone. Participants: A total of 39 interviewees comprised older adults undergoing the series of transitions from hospital to skilled nursing facility to home and their informal caregivers. Main measures: A constructionist, grounded-theory approach was used to code the interviews, identify major themes and subthemes, and develop a theoretical model explaining the outcomes of the SNF to home transition. Key results: The mean age of the patients was 76.6 years and 64.8 years for the caregivers. Four major themes were identified: comforts of home, information needs, post-SNF care, and independence. Patients noted an extended time away from home and were motivated to return to and remain in the home. Information needs were variably met and affected post-SNF care, including medication management, appointments, and therapy gains and setbacks. Interviewees identified independent function at home as the most important outcome of the transition home. Conclusions: Post-SNF in home support is needed rapidly after discharge from the SNF to prevent adverse outcomes. In-home support needs to be highly individualized based on a patient's and caregiver's unique situation and needs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factors Associated With Posthospital Nursing Facility Discharge for Patients With Impaired Decision Making
    (Elsevier, 2018-10) Carnahan, Jennifer L.; Inger, Lev; Young, Robert S.; Slaven, James E.; Torke, Alexia M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults
    (Springer Nature, 2017-12) Devnani, Rohit; Slaven, James E., Jr.; Bosslet, Gabriel T.; Montz, Kianna; Inger, Lev; Burke, Emily S.; Torke, Alexia M.; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized adults do not have the capacity to make their own health care decisions and thus require a surrogate decision-maker. While the ethical standard suggests that decisions should focus on a patient's preferences, our study explores the principles that surrogates consider most important when making decisions for older hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine how frequently surrogate decision-makers prioritized patient preferences in decision-making and what factors may predict their doing so. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a study conducted at three local hospitals that surveyed surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized patients 65 years of age and older. MAIN MEASURES: Surrogates rated the importance of 16 decision-making principles and selected the one that was most important. We divided the surrogates into two groups: those who prioritized patient preferences and those who prioritized patient well-being. We analyzed the two groups for differences in knowledge of patient preferences, presence of advance directives, and psychological outcomes. KEY RESULTS: A total of 362 surrogates rated an average of six principles as being extremely important in decision-making; 77.8% of surrogates selected a patient well-being principle as the most important, whereas only 21.1% selected a patient preferences principle. Advance directives were more common to the patient preferences group than the patient well-being group (61.3% vs. 44.9%; 95% CI: 1.01-3.18; p = 0.04), whereas having conversations with the patient about their health care preferences was not a significant predictor of surrogate group identity (81.3% vs. 67.4%; 95% CI: 0.39-1.14; p = 0.14). We found no differences between the two groups regarding surrogate anxiety, depression, or decisional conflict. CONCLUSIONS: While surrogates considered many factors, they focused more often on patient well-being than on patient preferences, in contravention of our current ethical framework. Surrogates more commonly prioritized patient preferences if they had advance directives available to them.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Non-Traditional Surrogate Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adults
    (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2018-04) Comer, Amber R.; Slaven, James E.; Montz, Annie; Burke, Emily; Inger, Lev; Torke, Alexia; Robert H. Mckinney School of Law
    Background Without advanced preparation of legal documents, state law determines who may serve as a surrogate decision maker for patients in hospitals. Objectives To examine the relationship characteristics associated with traditional versus non-traditional healthcare surrogates who are making medical decisions for patients in hospitals. Research Design Secondary analysis of a baseline cross-sectional survey of a larger prospective observational study. Subjects 364 patient/ surrogate dyads consisting of patients age 65 years and older admitted to the medical or medical ICU services who lacked decision making capacity based on a physician assessment and also had a surrogate available. Results This study of surrogate decision makers for hospitalized older adults found that the relationships of non-traditional surrogates such as, nieces, nephews, and friends serving in the surrogate role is nearly identical to those of traditional, first degree relatives serving as a surrogate. Over two-thirds (71.2%) of non-traditional surrogates saw the patient in person at least weekly compared to 80.8% of legal surrogates (p-value .9023). Almost all traditional and non-traditional surrogates discussed the patient’s medical preferences with the patient (96.9% of legal surrogates and 89.2% of non-traditional surrogates; p=0.0510). Conclusion This study shows that both traditional and non-traditional surrogates, who are a patient’s primary care giver have similar relationships with patients. The findings of this study suggest that requiring family members such as grandchildren to take the extra step of formal appointment through a legal channel may not be necessary to protect patients. Therefore, broader state laws expanding the list of surrogates authorized by state statute to include more non-traditional surrogates may be necessary.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Supporting breast cancer screening decisions for caregivers of older women with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    (Biomed Central, 2018-12-12) Fowler, Nicole R.; Schonberg, Mara A.; Sachs, Greg A.; Schwartz, Peter H.; Gao, Sujuan; Lane, Kathleen A.; Inger, Lev; Torke, Alexia M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) impact a woman's life expectancy and her ability to participate in medical decision-making about breast cancer screening, necessitating the involvement of family caregivers. Making decisions about mammography screening for women with ADRD is stressful. There are no data that suggest that breast cancer screening helps women with ADRD live longer or better. Decision aids may improve the quality of decision-making about mammography for ADRD patients and may inform family caregivers about the risks, benefits, and need for decision-making around mammography screening. METHODS/DESIGN: The Decisions about Cancer Screening in Alzheimer's Disease (DECAD) trial, a randomized controlled clinical trial, will enroll 426 dyads of older women with ADRD (≥75 years) and a family caregiver from clinics and primary-care practices in Indiana to test a novel, evidence-based decision aid. This decision aid includes information about the impact of ADRD on life expectancy, the benefit of mammograms, and the impact on the quality of life for older women with ADRD. Dyads will be randomized to receive the decision aid or active control information about home safety. This trial will examine the effect on the caregiver's decisional conflict (primary outcome) and the caregiver's decision-making self-efficacy (secondary outcome). A second follow-up at 15 months will include a brief, semi-structured interview with the caregiver regarding the patient's experience with mammograms and decision-making about mammograms. At the same time, a review of the patient's electronic medical record (EMR) will look at discussions about mammography with their primary-care physician and mammogram orders, receipt, results, and burden (e.g., additional diagnostic procedures due to false-positive results, identification of an abnormality on the screening exam but further work-up declined, and identification of a clinically unimportant cancer). A third follow-up at 24 months will extract EMR data on mammogram orders, occurrences, results, and the burden of mammograms. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that caregivers who receive the decision aid will have lower levels of decisional conflict and higher levels of decision-making self-efficacy compared to the control group. We also hypothesize that the DECAD decision aid will reduce mammography use among older women with ADRD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey
    (Elsevier, 2017-01) Torke, Alexia M.; Monahan, Patrick; Callahan, Christopher M.; Helft, Paul R.; Sachs, Greg A.; Wocial, Lucia D.; Slaven, James E.; Montz, Kianna; Inger, Lev; Burke, Emily; Medicine, School of Medicine
    CONTEXT: Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. METHODS: After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. RESULTS: Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation -0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (-0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.