Browsing by Author "Ibrahim, Sherrine A."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    786 Neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with diagnosis of COVID-19
    (Elsevier, 2021) Izewski, Joanna; Boudova, Sarah; Rouse, Caroline E.; Ibrahim, Sherrine A.; Shanks, Anthony L.; Reinhardt, Jeff C.; Scifres, Christina; Haas, David M.; Peipert, Jeffrey F.; Tuuli, Methodius G.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Objective It is unclear whether infection with COVID-19 during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that a diagnosis of COVID-19 during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity and other adverse neonatal outcomes. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from two labor and delivery units with universal COVID-19 testing policy between March 1 and May 31, 2020. Pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who delivered during the study period and underwent testing for COVID-19 at any point in their pregnancy were eligible. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal respiratory morbidity defined as the occurrence of any one of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, and need for respiratory support. The risk of neonatal morbidity with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis were compared using univariable and multivariable analyses. Stratified analysis compared the risks of adverse neonatal outcomes in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 to those without COVID-19. Results: Of 515 subjects meeting inclusion criteria, 55 (10.7%) tested positive for COVID-19; 19 (34.6%) were asymptomatic and 36 (65.4%) were symptomatic. No neonate tested positive for COVID-19. Rates of the primary outcome, composite neonatal respiratory morbidity, were not significantly different in patients with and without COVID-19 (21.8% vs 19.6%, P=0.692). There was no significant difference in the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity in a Cox regression model accounting for time from diagnosis to delivery, and adjusting for gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, and maternal diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% CI 0.35, 1.09). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes in patients with COVID-19 who were asymptomatic or symptomatic (Table). Conclusion: A diagnosis of COVID-19 during pregnancy does not appear to increase the risk of neonatal morbidity. These data may be useful in counseling women diagnosed with COVID-19 during pregnancy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    975 ABO blood group, rhesus type and risk of COVID-19 in pregnant women
    (Elsevier, 2021) Ibrahim, Sherrine A.; Boudova, Sarah; Rouse, Caroline E.; Shanks, Anthony L.; Reinhardt, Jeffrey; Scifres, Christina; Haas, David M.; Peipert, Jeffrey F.; Tuuli, Methodius G.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Objective: There is controversy regarding the association of ABO blood group, Rhesus (Rh) type and risk of COVID-19. We tested the hypothesis that ABO blood group and Rh type are associated with COVID-19 diagnosis and symptoms during pregnancy. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from two labor and delivery units with universal SARS-CoV-2 testing policy between March 1 and May 31, 2020. All pregnant women tested during the study period were eligible. The primary outcome was COVID-19 diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were measures of COVID-19 severity, including symptoms, ICU admission, respiratory support and treatment for COVID-19. Outcomes were compared across ABO blood groups. Women with blood group O or Rh positive blood type were compared with non-O groups and Rh negative, respectively, using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: Of 586 pregnant women tested, 66 (11.3%) were positive. The most common ABO blood group in the cohort was O (52.2%) and 87.4% were Rh positive. Rates of the primary outcome, COVID-19 diagnosis, were not significantly different across ABO blood groups (P=0.47). There were also no significant differences in measures of COVID-19 severity among blood groups (Table). Compared to other blood groups, the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis was not significantly different in women with group O (13.1% vs 9.3%, adjusted OR 1.43; 95% CI 0.84, 2.4). Rh positive women were at a significantly higher risk of COVID-19 diagnosis (12.3% vs 4.1%, adjusted OR 3.38; 95% CI 1.03, 11.07) and a non-significant increased risk of symptoms (6.8% vs 2.7%, adjusted OR 2.67; 95% CI 0.63, 11.32), after adjusting for ABO blood group (Figure). Conclusion: We found no association between ABO blood group and diagnosis or severity of COVID-19 in pregnant women. However, Rhesus positive women may be at a higher risk of COVID-19.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Do maternal demographics and prenatal history impact the efficacy of betamethasone therapy for threatened preterm labor?
    (BMC, 2021-06-24) Kinney, Mary T.; Quinney, Sara K.; Trussell, Hayley K.; Silva, Larissa L.; Ibrahim, Sherrine A.; Haas, David M.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Background: Betamethasone (BMZ) is used to accelerate fetal lung maturation in women with threatened preterm birth, but its efficacy is variable and limited by the lack of patient individualization in its dosing and administration. To determine sources of variability and potential opportunities for individualization of therapy, the objective of this study was to evaluate maternal factors associated with development of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in a cohort of women who received betamethasone. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled women, gestational ages 23-34 weeks, who received betamethasone for threatened preterm birth. Maternal demographics, prenatal history, and neonatal outcomes were abstracted from hospital records. RDS was the primary outcome. Associations between RDS diagnosis and maternal demographics, prenatal history, and betamethasone dosing were evaluated in a case-control analysis and multivariable regression adjusted for gestational age at delivery. Secondary analyses limited the cohort to women who delivered within 1 or 2 weeks of betamethasone dosing. Results: Of 209 deliveries, 90 (43 %) resulted in neonatal RDS. Within the overall cohort and controlling for gestational age at birth, RDS was only associated with cesarean births compared to vaginal births (adjusted OR 1.17 [1.06-1.29]). Route of delivery was also the only significant factor related to RDS in the 83 neonates delivered within 7 days of BMZ dosing. However, among 101 deliveries within 14 days of betamethasone dosing and controlling for gestational age at birth, women who experienced preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) had lower RDS rates than those without PPROM (57.9 % vs. 80.2 %, adjusted OR 0.81 [0.67-0.99]). Maternal age, BMI, race, and ethnicity were not associated with RDS in the regression models. Conclusions: Of maternal characteristics analyzed, only delivery by cesarean was associated with neonatal RDS after antenatal betamethasone use.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Role of progestogens in women at risk for spontaneous preterm birth: the final word?
    (Elsevier, 2021-03) Ibrahim, Sherrine A.; Haas, David M.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine