Browsing by Author "Husmann, Polly R."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Exploratory Study of Educators' Perspectives Towards Hospital School Program Support for Children with Special Health Care Needs After Hospitalization
    (Ubiquity Press, 2024-03-15) Ormiston, Heather E.; Husmann, Polly R.; Wikel, Kristin C.; Ruark, Chelsey; Reisinger, Debra L.; Curtin, Michelle J.; Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine
    More than 14 million children in the United States are identified as children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN). Rates of hospitalization for CSHCN with chronic conditions as well as re-admissions have been increasing in recent years. For hospitalized children transitioning back to their school of record, a host of issues may arise such as socioemotional concerns, peer rejection, and being behind in academics. Hospital-based school programs (HBSPs) play an important role in the transition back to a child's school of record. Utilizing a database of inpatient CSHCN at a midwestern children's hospital's HBSP, private and public-school educators associated with the previously hospitalized CSHCN were asked to complete an online survey to gather their perspectives related to the child's transition back to the school of record upon hospital discharge. Overall, educators' perspectives of the HBSP were positive while perceptions related to communication provided by the HBSP were mixed. Educators surveyed reported a lack of training related to working with CSHCN. Finally, accommodations and services offered to students upon return to school focused mostly on academic performance and attendance. Study limitations and implications for practice in schools are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Do the benefits continue? Long term impacts of the Anatomy Education Research Institute (AERI) 2017
    (BMC, 2022-11-24) Husmann, Polly R.; Brokaw, James J.; O’Loughlin, Valerie Dean; Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine
    Background: The Anatomy Education Research Institute (AERI) was held in Bloomington, Indiana in July of 2017. Previous research has shown that AERI was successful in meeting Kirkpatrick's first two levels of evaluation via positive initial reactions and learning gains identified at the end of AERI. This manuscript demonstrates continued success in Kirkpatrick levels two and three via six-month and thirty-month follow-up surveys and nine-month follow-up focus groups and interviews. Methods: Quantitative analyses were completed using Microsoft Excel (2019) and SPSS version 26 while qualitative analyses were completed for both survey responses and focus groups/interviews using thematic analyses. Results: Results demonstrate that the learning gains seen immediately post-AERI 2017 were sustained for all participants (accepted applicants and invited speakers). Qualitative results continued to demonstrate positive reactions to AERI 2017. Both quantitative and qualitative results demonstrated that the main obstacle to educational research for most participants is time, while collaboration, IRB, institutional roadblocks, and devaluing of educational research were also identified as obstacles. Conclusions: The research presented here indicates positive outcomes to Kirkpatrick Levels 1, 2, & 3 of evaluation following AERI 2017. However, substantial obstacles still exist for researchers in medical education. The need for a sustained community of practice for educational researchers was suggested as a potential buffer against these obstacles and multiple options for providing that community are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Education Track PhD Program in Anatomy at Indiana University School of Medicine: A Decade Producing Anatomy Educator-Scholars
    (2018) Brokaw, James J.; Husmann, Polly R.; O'Loughlin, Valerie D.
    In 2008, the Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) admitted its first student to a newly approved PhD program focusing on anatomical education rather than biomedical research. The goal of the Education Track PhD program is twofold: (1) to provide students with extensive training in all of the anatomical sub-disciplines coupled with sufficient teaching experience to be fully prepared to assume major educational responsibilities upon graduation and (2) to train students to conduct rigorous, medical education research and other educational scholarship necessary for promotion and tenure. The 90-credit hour curriculum includes coursework in anatomy and other biomedical subjects, education, statistics, and electives. For their dissertation work, the students complete a research project about some aspect of medical education. As of December 2017, the Education Track program had admitted 23 students and produced 10 graduates. Two more students are anticipated to graduate by June 2018. All of the graduates were offered faculty appointments (8 tenure track and 2 nontenure track) immediately upon graduation at major universities and medical schools. Four of the graduates were offered positions at IUSM. Eight graduates have appointments in medical school anatomy departments, 1 in a physical therapy department, and 1 in a physician assistant department. None of the graduates have been in their faculty positions long enough yet to have achieved tenure. During the period from 2009 through 2017, the students and graduates of the program gave 84 conference presentations and authored 47 peer-reviewed publications about anatomy or other aspects of medical education. Thus, in the 10 years since its inception, the Education Track program has successfully produced a small but stable supply of doctoral-level anatomy educator-scholars for a growing academic market.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impacts on student learning and the gross anatomy experience in medical education with the implementation of reciprocal peer teaching and self-directed learning
    (2018-08) Dunham, Stacey Marie; O'Loughlin, Valerie Dean; Brokaw, James J.; Husmann, Polly R.; Park-Rogers, Meredith A.
    Ongoing changes to medical education curricula in the United States require continued evaluation of best practices for maintaining and enhancing anatomical education in medical schools. The purpose of this study was to identify the impacts of incorporating an alternating dissection schedule, peer teaching, and self-directed learning (SDL) in the Human Gross Anatomy (A550-551) laboratory for students in the first year of medical school at Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington (IUSM-BL). The researcher sought to determine the impacts of peer teaching and dissection on student gross anatomy grades, to explore the underling perceived effects of peer teaching on the student gross anatomy experience, and to explain how a gross anatomy course, specifically the laboratory component, could contribute to the development of SDL. A mixed method design was selected to combine the analytic strengths of quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative analysis using a generalized estimating equation determined the act of dissection had an impact on students’ abilities to correctly identify structures on human gross anatomy assessments. An analysis of variance determined that student gross anatomy final grades, lecture exam averages, laboratory practical exam averages were unchanged when incorporating peer teaching and alternating dissections into the laboratory sessions. A grounded theory methodology identified perceived changes in the student experience in A550-551 through analysis of student interviews, instructor interviews, and course assignments. In conclusion, the researcher determined that active dissection is a critical component in gross anatomy; however, peer teaching and alternating dissections offset the negative impacts of reduced dissections hours through: increased active dissection time, decreased intragroup conflict, new opportunities to develop teaching and communication skills, and increased efficiency in the anatomy laboratory classroom. Additionally, this research described suggestions for future successful implementations of SDL in A5500-551. These findings provide information for educators at IUSM-BL as they make revisions to meet curricular demands and inform ongoing discussions in anatomy education related to the importance of dissection, time for laboratory experiences, and the continued goal for excellence in educating students.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Plans in Perspective: a Pilot Study of Medical Student Study Strategies in Physiology
    (Springer, 2019-07-15) Husmann, Polly R.; Chong, Alexander J.; Epidemiology, School of Public Health
    Students learn a great deal when they study course material outside of our classrooms, but we have little hard evidence of what they are actually doing during that time and how it varies over the course of the semester. This exploratory pilot study asked first-year medical students to complete study strategy surveys at the beginning and again at the end of a stand-alone physiology course. Responses to these surveys were then grouped into categories, and analyses were completed using above average and below average final grades in the course. The amount of change that occurred in individual student responses between pre-course and post-course surveys was also calculated. Results found that students with above average course grades were more likely to study with other students, make their own resources, and have lower grade expectations coming into the course than their peers with below average outcomes. Results also indicated that changing fewer study strategies may also be correlated with higher grades. Unfortunately, the sample sizes for this study are quite small, and additional data is unavailable locally due to curricular changes. It is hoped that other researchers may be able to further evaluate these ideas.