Browsing by Author "Hunt, Marcia G."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparing the Costs and Acceptability of Three Fidelity Assessment Methods for Assertive Community Treatment
    (Springer, 2017-09) Rollins, Angela L.; Kukla, Marina; Salyers, Michelle P.; McGrew, John H.; Flanagan, Mindy E.; Leslie, Doug L.; Hunt, Marcia G.; Department of Psychology, School of Science
    Successful implementation of evidence-based practices requires valid, yet practical fidelity monitoring. This study compared the costs and acceptability of three fidelity assessment methods: on-site, phone, and expert-scored self-report. Thirty-two randomly selected VA mental health intensive case management teams completed all fidelity assessments using a standardized scale and provided feedback on each. Personnel and travel costs across the three methods were compared for statistical differences. Both phone and expert-scored self-report methods demonstrated significantly lower costs than on-site assessments, even when excluding travel costs. However, participants preferred on-site assessments. Remote fidelity assessments hold promise in monitoring large scale program fidelity with limited resources.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of Assertive Community Treatment Fidelity Assessment Methods: Reliability and Validity
    (Springer, 2016-03) Rollins, Angela L.; McGrew, John H.; Kukla, Marina; McGuire, Alan B.; Flanagan, Mindy E.; Hunt, Marcia G.; Leslie, Doug L.; Collins, Linda A.; Wright-Berryman, Jennifer L.; Hicks, Lia J.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Department of Psychology, School of Science
    Assertive community treatment is known for improving consumer outcomes, but is difficult to implement. On-site fidelity measurement can help ensure model adherence, but is costly in large systems. This study compared reliability and validity of three methods of fidelity assessment (on-site, phone-administered, and expert-scored self-report) using a stratified random sample of 32 mental health intensive case management teams from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Overall, phone, and to a lesser extent, expert-scored self-report fidelity assessments compared favorably to on-site methods in inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. If used appropriately, these alternative protocols hold promise in monitoring large-scale program fidelity with limited resources.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Recovery-oriented Acute Inpatient Mental Health Care: Operationalization and Measurement
    (American Psychological Association, 2021) McGuire, Alan B.; Kukla, Marina; Rollins, Angela L.; Garabrant, Jennifer; Henry, Nancy; Eliacin, Johanne; Myers, Laura J.; Flanagan, Mindy E.; Hunt, Marcia G.; Iwamasa, Gayle Y.; Bauer, Sarah M.; Carter, Jessica L.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Psychology, School of Science
    Objective: The current article describes efforts to develop and test a measure of recovery-oriented inpatient care. Method: The Recovery-oriented Acute INpatient (RAIN) scale was based on prior literature and current Veterans Health Administration (VHA) policy and resources and further revised based on data collection from 34 VHA acute inpatient units. Results: A final scale of 23, behaviorally anchored items demonstrated a four-factor structure including the following factors: inpatient treatment planning, outpatient treatment planning, group programming, and milieu. While several items require additional revision to address psychometric concerns, the scale demonstrated adequate model fit and was consistent with prior literature on recovery-oriented inpatient care. Conclusions and Implementations for Practice: The RAIN scale represents an important tool for future implementation and empirical study of recovery-oriented inpatient care.