Browsing by Author "Hruban, Ralph H."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A risk prediction tool for individuals with a family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer: BRCAPANCPRO
    (Springer Nature, 2021) Blackford, Amanda L.; Childs, Erica J.; Porter, Nancy; Petersen, Gloria M.; Rabe, Kari G.; Gallinger, Steven; Borgida, Ayelet; Syngal, Sapna; Cote, Michele L.; Schwartz, Ann G.; Goggins, Michael G.; Hruban, Ralph H.; Parmigiani, Giovanni; Klein, Alison P.; Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Introduction: Identifying families with an underlying inherited cancer predisposition is a major goal of cancer prevention efforts. Mendelian risk models have been developed to better predict the risk associated with a pathogenic variant of developing breast/ovarian cancer (with BRCAPRO) and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer (PANCPRO). Given that pathogenic variants involving BRCA2 and BRCA1 predispose to all three of these cancers, we developed a joint risk model to capture shared susceptibility. Methods: We expanded the existing framework for PANCPRO and BRCAPRO to jointly model risk of pancreatic, breast, and ovarian cancer and validated this new model, BRCAPANCPRO on three data sets each reflecting the common target populations. Results: BRCAPANCPRO outperformed the prior BRCAPRO and PANCPRO models and yielded good discrimination for differentiating BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers from non-carriers (AUCs 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84 and 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.80) in families seen in high-risk clinics and pancreatic cancer family registries, respectively. In addition, BRCAPANCPRO was reasonably well calibrated for predicting future risk of pancreatic cancer (observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio = 0.81 [0.69, 0.94]). Discussion: The BRCAPANCPRO model provides improved risk assessment over our previous risk models, particularly for pedigrees with a co-occurrence of pancreatic cancer and breast and/or ovarian cancer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of EUS-guided tissue acquisition using two different 19-gauge core biopsy needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, and blinded study
    (Thieme Publishing Group, 2015-10) DeWitt, John; Cho, Chang-Min; Lin, Jingmei; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Canto, Marcia Irene; Salamone, Ashley; Hruban, Ralph H.; Messallam, Ahmed A.; Khashab, Mouen A.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The optimal core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is unknown. The principle aim of this study is to compare outcomes of EUS-fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with a new 19-gauge EUS histology needle (ProCore, Cook Medical Inc., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States) to a conventional 19-gauge Tru-Cut biopsy (EUS-TCB) needle (19G, Quick-Core, Cook Medical Inc.). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients referred for EUS who require possible histologic biopsy were prospectively randomized to EUS-FNB or EUS-TCB. With the initial needle, ≤ 3 biopsies were obtained until either technical failure or an adequate core was obtained. Patients with suspected inadequate biopsies were crossed over to the other needle and similarly ≤ 3 passes were obtained until adequate cores or technical failure occurred. Technical success, diagnostic histology, accuracy and complication rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (mean 58 years; 43 male) were randomized to FNB (n = 44) and TCB (n = 41) with seven patients excluded. Procedure indication, biopsy site, mass size, number of passes, puncture site, overall technical success and adverse events were similar between the two groups. FNB specimens had a higher prevalence of diagnostic histology (85 % vs. 57 %; P = 0.006), accuracy (88 % vs. 62 %; P = 0.02), mean total length (19.4 vs. 4.3 mm; P = 0.001), mean complete portal triads from liver biopsies (10.4 vs. 1.3; P = 0.0004) and required fewer crossover biopsies compared to those of TCB (2 % vs. 65 %; P = 0.0001). Overall technical success and complication rates were comparable. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNB using a 19-gauge FNB needle is superior to 19-gauge EUS-TCB needle.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A multimodality test to guide the management of patients with a pancreatic cyst
    (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2019-07-17) Springer, Simeon; Masica, David L.; Dal Molin, Marco; Douville, Christopher; Thoburn, Christopher J.; Afsari, Bahman; Li, Lu; Cohen, Joshua D.; Thompson, Elizabeth; Allen, Peter J.; Klimstra, David S.; Schattner, Mark A.; Schmidt, C. Max; Yip-Schneider, Michele; Simpson, Rachel E.; Castillo, Carlos Fernandez-Del; Mino-Kenudson, Mari; Brugge, William; Brand, Randall E.; Singhi, Aatur D.; Scarpa, Aldo; Lawlor, Rita; Salvia, Roberto; Zamboni, Giuseppe; Hong, Seung-Mo; Hwang, Dae Wook; Jang, Jin-Young; Kwon, Wooil; Swan, Niall; Geoghegan, Justin; Falconi, Massimo; Crippa, Stefano; Doglioni, Claudio; Paulino, Jorge; Schulick, Richard D.; Edil, Barish H.; Park, Walter; Yachida, Shinichi; Hijioka, Susumu; van Hooft, Jeanin; He, Jin; Weiss, Matthew J.; Burkhart, Richard; Makary, Martin; Canto, Marcia I.; Goggins, Michael G.; Ptak, Janine; Dobbyn, Lisa; Schaefer, Joy; Sillman, Natalie; Popoli, Maria; Klein, Alison P.; Tomasetti, Cristian; Karchin, Rachel; Papadopoulos, Nickolas; Kinzler, Kenneth W.; Vogelstein, Bert; Wolfgang, Christopher L.; Hruban, Ralph H.; Lennon, Anne Marie; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Pancreatic cysts are common and often pose a management dilemma, because some cysts are precancerous, whereas others have little risk of developing into invasive cancers. We used supervised machine learning techniques to develop a comprehensive test, CompCyst, to guide the management of patients with pancreatic cysts. The test is based on selected clinical features, imaging characteristics, and cyst fluid genetic and biochemical markers. Using data from 436 patients with pancreatic cysts, we trained CompCyst to classify patients as those who required surgery, those who should be routinely monitored, and those who did not require further surveillance. We then tested CompCyst in an independent cohort of 426 patients, with histopathology used as the gold standard. We found that clinical management informed by the CompCyst test was more accurate than the management dictated by conventional clinical and imaging criteria alone. Application of the CompCyst test would have spared surgery in more than half of the patients who underwent unnecessary resection of their cysts. CompCyst therefore has the potential to reduce the patient morbidity and economic costs associated with current standard-of-care pancreatic cyst management practices.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pancreatic cancer
    (Nature, 2016) Kleeff, Jorg; Korc, Murray; Apte, Minoti; La Vecchia, Carlo; Johnson, Colin D.; Biankin, Andrew V.; Neale, Rachel E.; Tempero, Margaret; Tuveson, David A.; Hruban, Ralph H.; Neoptolemos, John P.; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
    Pancreatic cancer is a major cause of cancer-associated mortality, with a dismal overall prognosis that has remained virtually unchanged for many decades. Currently, prevention or early diagnosis at a curable stage is exceedingly difficult; patients rarely exhibit symptoms and tumours do not display sensitive and specific markers to aid detection. Pancreatic cancers also have few prevalent genetic mutations; the most commonly mutated genes are KRAS, CDKN2A (encoding p16), TP53 and SMAD4 — none of which are currently druggable. Indeed, therapeutic options are limited and progress in drug development is impeded because most pancreatic cancers are complex at the genomic, epigenetic and metabolic levels, with multiple activated pathways and crosstalk evident. Furthermore, the multilayered interplay between neoplastic and stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment challenges medical treatment. Fewer than 20% of patients have surgically resectable disease; however, neoadjuvant therapies might shift tumours towards resectability. Although newer drug combinations and multimodal regimens in this setting, as well as the adjuvant setting, appreciably extend survival, ∼80% of patients will relapse after surgery and ultimately die of their disease. Thus, consideration of quality of life and overall survival is important. In this Primer, we summarize the current understanding of the salient pathophysiological, molecular, translational and clinical aspects of this disease. In addition, we present an outline of potential future directions for pancreatic cancer research and patient management.