Browsing by Author "Howards, Penelope P."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Disentangling Dialysis Facility and Transplant Center Factors on Evaluation Start Following Referral for Kidney Transplantation: A Regional Study in the United States
    (Elsevier, 2025-02-07) McPherson, Laura; Plantinga, Laura C.; Howards, Penelope P.; Kramer, Michael; Patzer, Rachel E.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Rationale & objective: Little is known about the relative importance of dialysis facilities and transplant centers on variability in starting an evaluation among patients referred for kidney transplant. The primary objective of this study was to leverage cross-classified multilevel modeling to simultaneously examine the contextual effects of dialysis facilities and transplant centers on variation in the start of the transplant evaluation process. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & participants: Dialysis patients referred for kidney transplant to transplant centers across the Southeast, Northeast, New York, or Ohio River Valley US regions from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020, were identified from the United States Renal Data System and the Early Steps to Transplant Access Registry and followed through June 30, 2021. A total of N=25,488 referred patients were nested with 1,720 dialysis facilities and 26 transplant centers. Outcomes: Starting an evaluation for kidney transplant at a transplant center within 6 months of referral. Analytical approach: A series of multilevel models were performed to estimate the variability in starting an evaluation for kidney transplant within 6 months of referral. The between-dialysis facility and/or transplant center variation in starting an evaluation was quantified using the median OR. Results: Among 25,488 dialysis patients referred for kidney transplantation, 51% of patients started an evaluation at a transplant center within 6 months of referral. In multilevel models, the median OR between transplant centers was higher (indicating higher unexplained variability) than the dialysis facility median OR, regardless of measured patient, dialysis facility, and transplant center characteristics. Limitations: Early transplant access data was limited to 20 of 48 transplant centers across these 4 regions. Conclusions: When taking dialysis facilities and transplant centers into account, variation in starting an evaluation for kidney transplant appeared at both the dialysis facility and transplant center-level but was more apparent among transplant centers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Referral and Evaluation for Kidney Transplantation among Patients with Lupus Nephritis-Related End-Stage Kidney Disease
    (Sage, 2024) McPherson, Laura; Plantinga, Laura C.; Howards, Penelope P.; Kramer, Michael; Pastan, Stephen O.; Patzer, Rachel E.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Objective: For the majority of patients with lupus nephritis-related end-stage kidney disease (LN-ESKD), kidney transplant is associated with better outcomes than dialysis. Access to kidney transplant requires an initial referral to a transplant center and medical evaluation prior to waitlisting. The study's objective was to examine access to these early steps in the kidney transplant process among patients with LN-ESKD. Methods: Adults who began treatment for ESKD in the Southeast, Northeast, New York, or Ohio River Valley U.S. regions from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2019, followed through 6/30/2021, were identified from the United States Renal Data System. Referral and evaluation start data were collected from 28 of 48 transplant centers across these regions. The exposure was primary cause of ESKD (LN-ESKD vs other-ESKD). The outcomes were referral and evaluation start at a transplant center. Cox models quantified the association between LN-ESKD (vs other-ESKD) and referral and evaluation start. Results: Among 192,318 patients initiating treatment for ESKD, 0.4% had LN-ESKD. Over half (58%) of LN-ESKD patients were referred before study end, and among those referred, 66% started the evaluation. In adjusted analyses, patients with LN-ESKD were referred (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.19) and started the transplant evaluation (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.28) at a higher rate than patients with other-ESKD. Among referred patients with LN-ESKD, the median time from ESKD start to referral was 2.9 months (IQR: <1 to 11.7 months), which is similar to patients with other-ESKD (median 2.6 months, IQR: <1 to 8.8 months). Conclusions: Among incident patients with ESKD, having a primary diagnosis of LN-ESKD versus other-ESKD is associated with higher rates of early transplant access outcomes. Despite this, patients with LN-ESKD (vs other-ESKD) are less likely to be preemptively referred (i.e., referred prior to ESKD start) for kidney transplant. While providers may no longer be delaying the early steps in the kidney transplantation process among this patient population, there is still room for improvement in the rates of preemptive referral. Access to kidney transplant referral prior to ESKD could result in increased transplant rates and better transplant outcomes for patients with LN-ESKD.