Browsing by Author "Holley, Matthew"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Faculty Learning Communities: A Collaborative Model for Professional Development of Medical Educators in our Multi-Campus System, 2019 to Present
    (2024) Kochhar, Komal; Longtin, Krista; WIlson, Shawn; Ho, Monling; Hobson, Tara; Holley, Matthew; Brokaw, James; Wallach, Paul
    Background The Indiana University School of Medicine employs a large geographically distributed system of medical education composed of 8 regional medical campuses and the main medical campus in Indianapolis. Medical educators need targeted faculty development programs to give them the skills necessary to produce educational scholarship for promotion and tenure. An inherent challenge of operating such a large multi-campus system is being able to provide relevant professional development opportunities for all our medical educators across the state. Objective To provide relevant professional development opportunities for all medical education faculty across our large multi-campus system statewide. Methods Beginning the Fall of 2019, we implemented Faculty Learning Communities (FLCs) specifically designed to develop faculty competence in medical education research. All medical school faculty across our statewide system were eligible to participate. Each FLC team consisted of 4-6 medical educators engaged in a collaborative educational research project led by an experienced faculty mentor. The FLC teams met monthly via Zoom over a 2-year term to establish priorities, share ideas, distribute the workload, and produce the scholarly product(s). In addition to the group work, participants were expected to attend a series of monthly webinars to build foundational skills in educational research. Results To date, 63 medical educators (both preclinical/clinical) have participated in 13 FLC teams. To assess participant satisfaction, surveys were administered at the mid-point and at the end of each FLC team’s term (68% cumulative response rate). Averaged across all teams, a majority of respondents:  Rated their FLC experience as “Good” to “Excellent” (81%)  “Strongly agreed” or “agreed” that the FLC process met their professional development needs (73%)  Were interested in participating in future FLC teams (65%) By the end of their term, about one-half of the participants had submitted their work for publication or presentation. Conclusion By participating in FLCs, medical educators from the regional campuses and main campus were able to effectively collaborate on projects of mutual interest. In our experience, FLCs provide a cost-effective and sustainable model for developing medical educators. Although lack of protected time may be an impediment for clinician participation, this can be partially mitigated by requiring the clinical chair’s approval before joining an FLC team.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sexual Health Teaching in the Family Medicine Clerkship: Results of a CERA Survey
    (Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, 2021-07-09) Stumbar, Sarah E.; Garba, Nana Aisha; de la Cruz, Marisyl; Bhoite, Prasad; Holley, Matthew; Adams, Christine; Virani, Anna; Kale, Neelima; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: With growing efforts to provide comprehensive and inclusive sexual health care, family medicine clerkships are well positioned to educate learners about a spectrum of related topics. This study investigated the current state of sexual health instruction in family medicine clerkships, including specific factors impacting its delivery. Methods: Questions about sexual health curricula were created and included as part of the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance survey of family medicine clerkship directors. The survey was distributed via email to 163 recipients between June 1, 2020 and June 25, 2020. Results: One hundred five (64.42%) of 163 clerkship directors responded to the survey. Our results revealed that during family medicine clerkships, family planning, contraception, and pregnancy options counseling are covered significantly more often than topics related to sexual dysfunction and satisfaction and LGBTQ+ health. Most clerkship directors (91.5%) reported less than 5 hours of sexual health training in their curriculum. Those with more dedicated sexual health curricular hours were more likely to include simulation. Lack of time (41.7%) was the most frequently reported barrier to incorporating sexual health content into the clerkship. Conclusions: Coverage of sexual health topics during the family medicine clerkship is limited in scope and delivery. To support curricular development and integration, future studies should more thoroughly examine the factors influencing the inclusion of sexual health content in family medicine clerkships as well as the development of assessment methods to determine competency.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of Artificial Intelligence Program to Increase Resident Confidence and POCUS Use at the Bedside
    (2024-04-26) Wilcox, James; Lobo, Daniela; Hernandez, Reuben; Holley, Matthew; Renshaw, Scott
    Introduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) education continues to increase in undergraduate and graduate medical education, mostly fueled by clinical usefulness and increasing graduate medical education requirements. Many schools are now teaching POCUS as a core part of the curriculum. However, with the sudden rush of POCUS education, one barrier often identified in the literature is a lack of trained faculty to educate residents and medical students. Study Objective: Our team at the Family Medicine Department recruited an artificial intelligence program developed by Global Ultrasound Institute to assist POCUS instructors with resident ultrasound education. The research project would use AI programming and learning to allow residents to access timely answers to questions at the bedside while on rounds, when a trained POCUS instructor might not always be present. Since POCUS instructors cannot be available for every bedside patient examination in the hospital or residency clinic, this AI program would provide answers to needed bedside questions to give residents more confidence with performing more POCUS evaluations. Methods: We would deploy the AI program for interns who have completed at least 6 months of POCUS training and residents who had completed prior intern POCUS training. This program would be available on smart phone devices for when rounding in adult medicine, pediatrics, OBGYN, and in the outpatient residency clinic. Residents will have 24/7 access to a smart AI who will answer questions about POCUS technique, indications for use, interpretation questions, and many more. The program will give residents a quick and focused answer, as well as access to resources for further study if needed. Resident POCUS use will be tracked with the Butterfly IQ academy, as well as with resident procedure logging. Results: Since this is a very new program and relationship with Global Ultrasound Institute, no results are currently available. We anticipate preliminary results will be available by the presentation date in April. Conclusions: Artificial Intelligence is changing the way medical education is approached in the United States and the world. This particular program will allow residents to have access to timely answers to their POCUS practice questions at the bedside, while on rounds. We anticipate this will allow residents the opportunity to use the ultrasound devices for more cases and scenarios, as well as have improved confidence in their ultrasound acquisition abilities, with the support of the AI Education Assistant.