Browsing by Author "Herbenick, Debby"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 28
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    80. Disparities in Perceived Vulnerability to COVID-19 Consequences Among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey
    (Elsevier, 2021-02) Hensel, Devon J.; Rosenberg, Molly; Luetke, Maya; Herbenick, Debby; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Global research has documented the adverse impact of COVID-19 on the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults (AYA). Pandemic conditions can increase AYA vulnerability to COVID-19-related health (e.g. getting sick or missing medical appointments), social (e.g. not having enough to eat) and economic (e.g. job loss) consequences. Structural inequalities may further exacerbate exposure to these outcomes. We used nationally representative data to examine AYA perceived vulnerability to health/social outcomes early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Data were the 2020 National Survey of Sexual and Reproductive Health during COVID-19 (Ipsos Research: Menlo Park, CA, USA), an online, nationally representative survey of COVID-19 experiences and knowledge among noninstitutionalized adults in the United States (all 50 states and District of Columbia). Of all individuals recruited (N=1632; 18-94 years), 1010 (62%) completed the survey. We retained a subsample of participants 18-25 years of age (N=106; 10.1% of the larger study) for our current analytic sample. Participants rated the next 12-week occurrence likelihood of eight COVID consequences (all dichotomized for analsis: no chance + low chance – 25% vs. medium chance – 25% to 75% + high chance - >75%). Illness consequences were: being exposed to COVID-19, getting an infection from COVID-19, being hospitalized from COVID-19, knowing someone with COVID-19, knowing someone who has died from COVID-19. Social/economic consequences were: losing job, partner/spouse losing job, not having enough to eat, parent(s) losing their job, missing important healthcare appointments/treatments. Structural variables were: gender (male/female), age (18-21/22-25), sexual identity (heterosexual/sexual minority [SM]) and race/ethnicity (White/BIPOC). We evaluated the prevalence heterogeneity across structural variables using nonparametric McNemar tests. All estimates were adjusted using Ipsos provided weights to account for sampling differences and/or nonresponse. Results: The majority of AYA in the United States (85%) believed they were vulnerable to 2+ health or social/economic consequences. Significantly more SM (36.4%-57.5%) than heterosexual (23.2%-37.0%; p<.001 both) AYA perceived vulnerability to being exposed to and/or getting an infection from COVID-19. A significantly greater number of BIPOC (16.2%-38.7%) than White (11.4%-18.8%; p<.001 both) believed they were vulnerable to COVID19-associated hospitalization or job loss. More SM (26.4%) than heterosexual (22.4%; p<.001) AYA estimated a medium-to high likelihood they would know someone who died of COVID-19. Significantly more BIPOC than White AYA felt high vulnerability to personal job loss (38.7% vs. 18.8%; p=.015), parent job loss (19.0% vs. 16.3%; p<.001) and not having enough to eat (16.3% vs. 10.0%; p<.001). Conclusions: Nationally, many AYA – particularly sexual minority and BIOPC youth – believe they are highly vulnerability to COVID-19 associated consequences. Professionals who work with youth may consider including screening for COVID-19 worries during clinical/educational interactions as a means of both understanding and normalizing AYA’s experiences, as well as helping them devise support or coping mechanisms, during this unprecedented time. These “check-ins” may be particularly where long-term worry about COVID-19 could exacerbate existing disparities in mental and physical health among marginalized AYA.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    80. Disparities in Perceived Vulnerability to COVID-19 Consequences Among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey
    (Elsevier, 2021-02) Hensel, Devon J.; Rosenberg, Molly; Luetke, Maya; Herbenick, Debby; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Global research has documented the adverse impact of COVID-19 on the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults (AYA). Pandemic conditions can increase AYA vulnerability to COVID-19-related health (e.g. getting sick or missing medical appointments), social (e.g. not having enough to eat) and economic (e.g. job loss) consequences. Structural inequalities may further exacerbate exposure to these outcomes. We used nationally representative data to examine AYA perceived vulnerability to health/social outcomes early in the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adolescents' Discussion of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Topics With Providers: Findings From a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of U.S. Adolescents
    (Elsevier, 2021-03) Hensel, Devon J.; Herbenick, Debby; Beckmeyer, Jonathon J.; Fu, Tsung-chieh; Dodge, Brian; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Purpose National practice guidelines encourage providers address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) as part of all clinical encounters with adolescents. Yet, no studies provide nationally representative estimates of how frequently adolescents are screened. Methods Data were adolescent participants (aged 14–17 years; N = 826) in the 2018 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior, an online, nationally representative study of sexual health experiences of people in the U.S. SRH variables were: (all no/yes) pregnancy prevention, sexual identity, STD/HIV prevention, sexual difficulties, sexually transmitted infections testing, and sexual activity. We used descriptive statistics and weighted logistic regression (Stata 16.0; all p < .05) to examine differences in the odds of SRH discussion with provider by sexual identity, age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Results The coverage of SRH topics was poor. The most common topic was asking about sexual activity (52.9%), and the least common was being offered a sexually transmitted infection test (21.7%). An adolescent’s sexual identity, race/ethnicity, and age affected the odds of topic screening. Conclusions Health care providers appear to both infrequently and inconsistently address key SRH topics during encounters with young people. Targeted interventions should focus on strengthening the regularity and depth of clinicians’ SRH conversations regardless of adolescent demographic or history.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of Frequent Sexual Choking/Strangulation With Neurophysiological Responses: A Pilot Resting-State fMRI Study
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2023) Hou, Jiancheng; Huibregtse, Megan E.; Alexander, Isabella L.; Klemsz, Lillian M.; Fu, Tsung-Chieh; Fortenberry, J. Dennis; Herbenick, Debby; Kawata, Keisuke; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Being choked or strangled during partnered sex is an emerging sexual behavior, prevalent among young adult women. The goal of this study was to test whether, and to what extent, frequently being choked or strangled during sex is associated with cortical surface functioning and functional connectivity. This case-control study consisted of two groups (choking vs. choking-naïve). Women who were choked 4 or more times during sex in the past 30 days were enrolled into the choking group, whereas those without were assigned to the choking-naïve group. We collected structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and analyzed the data for amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) using cortical surface-based resting-state fMRI analysis, followed by static and dynamic resting-state fMRI connectivity analysis. Forty-one participants (choking n = 20; choking-n-aïve n = 21) contributed to the analysis. An inter-hemispheric imbalance in neuronal activation pattern was observed in the choking group. Specifically, we observed significantly lower ALFF and ReHo in the left cortical regions (e.g., angular gyrus, orbitofrontal gyrus) and higher ALFF and ReHo in the right cortical regions (e.g., pre-central/post-central gyri) in the choking group compared with the choking-naïve group. A significant group difference was found in static functional connectivity between the bilateral angular gyrus and the whole brain, in which the choking group's angular gyrus showed hyperconnectivity with, for example, the post-central gyrus, pre-central gyrus, and Rolandic operculum, relative to the choking-naïve group. The dynamic analysis revealed hyperconnectivity between the left angular gyrus and the bilateral postcentral gyrus in the choking group compared with the choking-naïve group. Taken together, our data show that multiple experiences of sexual choking/strangulation are associated with an inter-hemispheric imbalance in neural activation pattern and hyperconnectivity between the angular gyrus and brain regions related to motor control, consciousness, and emotion. A longitudinal study using multi-modal neurological assessments is needed to clarify the acute and chronic consequences of sexual choking/strangulation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes in Penile-Vaginal Intercourse Frequency and Sexual Repertoire from 2009 to 2018: Findings from the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior
    (Springer, 2021-11) Herbenick, Debby; Rosenberg, Molly; Golzarri-Arroyo, Lilian; Fortenberry, J. Dennis; Fu, Tsung-chieh; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Solo and partnered sexual behaviors are relevant to health, well-being, and relationships. Recent research shows that sexual frequency has declined in the U.S. and in other countries; however, measurement has been imprecise. We used data from 14- to 49-year-old participants in the 2009 and 2018 waves of the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (NSSHB), a confidential U.S. nationally representative survey that is conducted online. We aimed to: (1) assess changes in frequency of past-year penile-vaginal intercourse and (2) examine combinations of past-year sexual behaviors for each of the two waves. We hypothesized that we would observe lower frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI) from 2009 to 2018 and that we would observe greater engagement in sexual repertoires involving non-coital partnered behaviors (e.g., partnered masturbation, oral sex) in 2018 as compared to 2009. Participants were 4155 individuals from the 2009 NSSHB (Adolescents: 406 females, 414 males; Adults: 1591 women, 1744 men) and 4547 individuals from the 2018 NSSHB (Adolescents: 416 females, 411 males; Adults: 2007 women, 1713 men). Compared to adult participants in the 2009 NSSHB, adults in the 2018 NSSHB were significantly more likely to report no PVI in the prior year (28% in 2018 vs. 24% in 2009). A similar difference in proportions reporting no PVI in the prior year was observed among 14–17-year-old adolescents (89% in 2018 vs. 79% in 2009). Additionally, for both adolescents and adults, we observed decreases in all modes of partnered sex queried and, for adolescents, decreases in solo masturbation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes in Solo and Partnered Sexual Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a U.S. Probability Surve
    (medRxiv, 2020) Hensel, Devon; Rosenberg, Molly; Luetke, Maya; Fu, Tsung-chieh; Herbenick, Debby
    Background Research demonstrates that pandemics adversely impact sexual and reproductive health (SRH), but few have examined their impact on people’s participation in sex. We examined self-reported changes in solo and sexual behaviors in U.S. adults during early stages of the public health response to COVID-19. Methods We conducted an online, nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of U.S. adults (N=1010; aged 18-94 years; 62% response rate) from April 10-20, 2020. We used weighted multinomial logistic regression to examine past month self-reported changes (decreased, stable or increased) in ten solo and partnered sexual behaviors. Predictor variables included: having children at home, past month depressive symptoms, (ACHA 3-item scale), past month loneliness (UCLA 3-Item Loneliness scale), COVID-19 protection behaviors (adapted 12-item scale), perceived COVID-19 consequences (adapted 10-item scale) and COVID-19 knowledge (adapted 10-item scale). Results Nearly half of all adults reported some kind of change – most commonly, a decrease – in their sexual behavior in the past month. Having elementary aged children at home, past month depressive symptoms and loneliness and enacting more COVID-19 protective behaviors were associated with both reduced partnered bonding behaviors, such as hugging, cuddling, holding hands and kissing, as well as reduced partnered sexual behaviors, such as oral sex, partnered genital touching and vaginal sex. Greater COVID-19 risk perception and greater COVID-19 knowledge were associated with mixed effects in behavior outcomes. Conclusions Our data illustrate the very personal ways in which different pandemic-associated factors may create or inhibit opportunities for solo and partnered sex. The centrality of sexuality to health and well-being – even during pandemics – means that a critical piece of public health prevention and management responses should is ensuring that services and resource that support positive sexual decision making remain open and available.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Considerations in the Measurement and Reporting of Withdrawal: Findings from the 2018 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior
    (Elsevier, 2019-08) Fu, Tsung-chieh; Hensel, Devon J.; Beckmeyer, Jonathon J.; Dodge, Brian; Herbenick, Debby; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction Although withdrawal use is routinely measured as part of contraceptive surveillance in the United States, its assessment may be prone to underreporting and measurement errors. Additionally, at the population level, little is known about subjective experiences of withdrawal. Aim To measure respondents’ frequency of and reasons for engaging in extra-vaginal ejaculation in the past year, and to compare contraceptive withdrawal vs extra-vaginal/anal ejaculation during the most recent sexual event. Methods The 2018 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior is a U.S. nationally representative probability survey of adolescents and adults. This study was administered in February–March 2018 via GfK Research’s KnowledgePanel. Respondents who reported consensual penile-vaginal intercourse in the past year were included in the analysis. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with finding extra-vaginal ejaculation sexy/arousing. Main Outcome Measures Main outcomes were the frequency of and reasons for extra-vaginal ejaculation in the past year, as well as reported contraceptive withdrawal use and the location of ejaculation at the most recent penile-vaginal intercourse. Results In the past year, approximately 60% of respondents reported engaging in any extra-vaginal ejaculation; pregnancy prevention and sexual pleasure were given as common reasons. Those who were men, white, or aged 25–29 were more likely to find extra-vaginal ejaculation sexy or arousing; no gender differences were observed in their partner’s perception of this act. Prevalence of selecting withdrawal on the contraceptive inventory was 12.2% (95% CI 10.6–14.0) at last sexual event, whereas extra-vaginal/anal ejaculation was reported by 20.8% (95% CI 18.7–23.0). This lack of concordance in differing measures was observed consistently across all age groups, and approximately 12% to 14% of individuals reported an ejaculation location that did not correspond to their withdrawal use. Clinical Implications The results of this study have implications for how healthcare providers discuss withdrawal with their patients and counsel them on using extra-vaginal ejaculation as part of their contraceptive use or part of their sexual repertoire. Strengths & Limitations This is the first nationally representative study to directly compare contraceptive withdrawal to extra-vaginal ejaculation. Limited data were collected at event level regarding motivations for extra-vaginal ejaculation, pregnancy attitudes, perceptions of condoms and sexually transmitted infection prevention, or exposure to erotic media, thus limiting further assessment of relationships between various factors and extra-vaginal/anal ejaculation. Conclusion We found that reporting of withdrawal as a contraceptive method vs extra-vaginal/anal ejaculation was inconsistent and that extra-vaginal/anal ejaculation was commonly used for reasons other than pregnancy prevention; future research should use more precise measures of “withdrawal.”
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Depression and loneliness during April 2020 COVID-19 restrictions in the United States, and their associations with frequency of social and sexual connections
    (Springer, 2021-01) Rosenberg, Molly; Luetke, Maya; Hensel, Devon J.; Kianersi, Sina; Fu, Tsung-chieh; Herbenick, Debby; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of depression and loneliness during the US COVID-19 response, and examine their associations with frequency of social and sexual connections. Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of American adults (n = 1010), aged 18–94, running from April 10–20, 2020. We assessed depressive symptoms (CES-D-10 scale), loneliness (UCLA 3-Item Loneliness scale), and frequency of in-person and remote social connections (4 items, e.g., hugging family member, video chats) and sexual connections (4 items, e.g., partnered sexual activity, dating app use). Results: One-third of participants (32%) reported depressive symptoms, and loneliness was high [mean (SD): 4.4 (1.7)]. Those with depressive symptoms were more likely to be women, aged 20–29, unmarried, and low-income. Very frequent in-person connections were generally associated with lower depression and loneliness; frequent remote connections were not. Conclusions: Depression and loneliness were elevated during the early US COVID-19 response. Those who maintained very frequent in-person, but not remote, social and sexual connections had better mental health outcomes. While COVID-19 social restrictions remain necessary, it will be critical to expand mental health services to serve those most at-risk and identify effective ways of maintaining social and sexual connections from a distance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Do Adolescents and Young Adults Learn About Condoms from Healthcare Providers? Findings from a US Probability Sample
    (Springer, 2022-06) Beckmeyer, Jonathon J.; Patterson, Callie L.; Fu, Tsung-Chieh; Hensel, Devon J.; Dodge, Brian; Herbenick, Debby; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction Using data from the 2018 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior, we determined the prevalence and content of adolescents’ and young adults’ communication with healthcare providers about condom use. Methods Adolescents (14–17 years old; n = 283) and young adults (18–24 years old, n = 225), who discussed sexual health with a healthcare provider in the past year, reported if they had discussed condom use with a healthcare provider, and among those who did, they also reported why healthcare providers recommended condoms, if they demonstrated correct condom use, and/or provided condoms. Data collection occurred in February and March 2018. Results Most adolescents (71.0%) and young adults (66.7%) who discussed sexual health with a healthcare provider reported discussing condom use. Condoms were most often recommended for both pregnancy and STD prevention. Fewer adolescents and young adults were shown how to use condoms (11.4% of adolescents; 5.7% of young adults) or provided condoms (14.9% of adolescents; 14.7% of young adults). Only 3.2% of adolescents and 1.3% of young adults had healthcare providers who discussed, demonstrated, and provided condoms. Conclusions Sexual health conversations with healthcare providers are likely to include condoms. But few adolescents and young adults were shown how to use condoms or provide condoms.