Browsing by Author "Henderson, Macey"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study
    (BioMed Central, 2014) Watson, Dennis P.; Young, Jeani; Ahonen, Emily Q.; Xu, Huiping; Henderson, Macey; Shuman, Valery; Tolliver, Randi; Department of Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Background: There is currently a lack of scientifically designed and tested implementation strategies. Such strategies are particularly important for highly complex interventions that require coordination between multiple parts to be successful. This paper presents a protocol for the development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex intervention known as the Housing First model (HFM). Housing First is an evidence-based practice for chronically homeless individuals demonstrated to significantly improve a number of outcomes. Methods/design: Drawing on practices demonstrated to be useful in implementation and e-learning theory, our team is currently adapting a face-to-face implementation strategy so that it can be delivered over a distance. Research activities will be divided between Chicago and Central Indiana, two areas with significantly different barriers to HFM implementation. Ten housing providers (five from Chicago and five from Indiana) will be recruited to conduct an alpha test of each of four e-learning modules as they are developed. Providers will be requested to keep a detailed log of their experience completing the modules and participate in one of two focus groups. After refining the modules based on alpha test results, we will test the strategy among a sample of four housing organizations (two from Chicago and two from Indiana). We will collect and analyze both qualitative and quantitative data from administration and staff. Measures of interest include causal factors affecting implementation, training outcomes, and implementation outcomes. Discussion: This project is an important first step in the development of an evidence-based implementation strategy to increase scalability and impact of the HFM. The project also has strong potential to increase limited scientific knowledge regarding implementation strategies in general.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of an Inpatient Geriatric Consultative Service on Outcomes for Cognitively Impaired Patients
    (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015-05) Nazir, Arif; Khan, Babar; Counsell, Steven; Henderson, Macey; Gao, Sujuan; Boustani, Malaz; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background Impact of geriatric consultative services (GCS) on hospital readmission and mortality outcomes for cognitively impaired (CI) patients is not known. Objective Evaluate impact of GCS on hospital readmission and mortality among CI inpatients. Design Secondary data-analysis of a prospective trial of a computerized decision support system between July 1, 2006, and May 30, 2008. Setting Study conducted at XXXXX hospital, a 340-bed, public hospital with over 2,300 yearly admissions of 65 or older. Patients 415 inpatients aged 65 and older with CI were enrolled from July 2006 to March 2008. Measurements 30 day and one year mortality and hospital readmission following the index admission. Cox’s proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between receiving GCS, re-admission or mortality while adjusting for demographics, discharge destination, delirium, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and prior hospitalizations. The propensity score method was used to adjust for the non-random assignment of GCS. Results Patients receiving GCS were older (79; 8.1 SD vs 76; 7.8 SD; p<.001 with higher incidence of delirium (49% vs. 29%; p<.001)). No significant differences were found between the groups for hospital readmission (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.19; 95% CI = 0.89, 1.59) and mortality at 12 months of index admission (HR=.91 ; 95% CI = 0.59, 1.40). However, a significant increase in readmissions was observed for the GCS group (HR=1.75; 95% CI = 1.06–2.88) at 30 days post-discharge. Conclusion One year post-discharge outcomes of CI patients that received GCS were not different from patients who did not receive the service. New models of care are needed to improve post-discharge readmission and mortality among hospitalized patients with CI.