Browsing by Author "Heidenreich, Axel"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Oncological Follow-up Strategies for Testicular Germ Cell Tumours: A Narrative Review(Elsevier, 2022-09-07) Kaufmann, Ernest; Antonelli, Luca; Albers, Peter; Cary, Clint; Gillessen Sommer, Silke; Heidenreich, Axel; Oing, Christoph; Oldenburg, Jan; Pierorazio, Phillip Martin; Stephenson, Andrew J.; Fankhauser, Christian Daniel; Urology, School of MedicineContext: The aim of this review is to describe the proportion of testicular germ cell tumours (tGCTs) with recurrence, and the timing and anatomical sites of relapse across different disease stages and after different treatment options. We summarise published follow-up protocols and discuss current and future developments to personalise follow-up for patients with tGCT. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search was conducted and current guidelines and selected institutional follow-up protocols were reviewed. Evidence synthesis: Of 302 publications, we screened 68 full texts and included 29 studies; 22 of these were retrospective and seven were prospective in nature, contributing data for 20 570 patients. The number of patients included per study ranged from 119 to 2483. We compared the guideline follow-up protocols of the European Society for Medical Oncology, European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Urological Association, as well as institutional follow-up protocols. The protocols differed in terms of the number, time points, and type of follow-up investigations. Conclusions: Future research should assess how tGCT can be followed to ensure high adherence, define the role of miR-371a-3p microRNA during follow-up, and develop follow-up protocols after curative treatment in the metastatic setting. Patient summary: In this review of follow-up protocols for men with testis cancer, we observed different recommendations and discuss future research areas to improve follow-up for these patients.Item Outcome of Men With Relapses After Adjuvant Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Clinical Stage I Nonseminoma(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020-04) Fischer, Stefanie; Tandstad, Torgrim; Cohn-Cedermark, Gabriella; Thibault, Constance; Vincenzi, Bruno; Klingbiel, Dirk; Albany, Costantine; Necchi, Andrea; Terbuch, Angelika; Lorch, Anja; Aparicio, Jorge; Heidenreich, Axel; Hentrich, Marcus; Wheater, Matthew; Langberg, Carl W.; Ståhl, Olof; Fankhauser, Christian Daniel; Hamid, Anis A.; Koutsoukos, Konstantinos; Shamash, Jonathan; White, Jeff; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Beyer, Jörg; Gillessen, Silke; Medicine, School of MedicinePurpose: Clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS) is a disease limited to the testis without metastases. One treatment strategy after orchiectomy is adjuvant chemotherapy. Little is known about the outcome of patients who experience relapse after such treatment. Patients and methods: Data from 51 patients with CSI NS who experienced a relapse after adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) from 18 centers/11 countries were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survivals calculated from day 1 of treatment at first relapse. Secondary outcomes were time to, stage at, and treatment of relapse and rate of subsequent relapses. Results: Median time to relapse was 13 months, with the earliest relapse 2 months after start of adjuvant treatment and the latest after 25 years. With a median follow-up of 96 months, the 5-year PFS was 67% (95% CI, 54% to 82%) and the 5-year OS was 81% (95% CI, 70% to 94%). Overall, 19 (37%) of 51 relapses occurred later than 2 years. Late relapses were associated with a significantly higher risk of death from NS (hazard ratio, 1.10 per year; P = .01). Treatment upon relapse was diverse: the majority of patients received a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced a subsequent relapse. At last follow-up, 41 patients (80%) were alive and disease-free, eight (16%) had died of progressive disease, and one patient (2%) each had died from therapy-related or other causes. Conclusion: Outcomes of patients with relapse after adjuvant BEP seem better compared with patients who experience relapse after treatment of metastatic disease but worse compared with those who have de-novo metastatic disease. We found a substantial rate of late and subsequent relapses. There seem to be three patterns of relapse with different outcomes: pure teratoma, early viable NS relapse (< 2 years), and late viable NS relapse (> 2 years).Item Predicting Outcomes in Men With Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors (NSGCT): Results From the IGCCCG Update Consortium(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021) Gillessen, Silke; Sauvé, Nicolas; Collette, Laurence; Daugaard, Gedske; de Wit, Ronald; Albany, Costantine; Tryakin, Alexey; Fizazi, Karim; Stahl, Olof; Gietema, Jourik A.; De Giorgi, Ugo; Cafferty, Fay H.; Hansen, Aaron R.; Tandstad, Torgrim; Huddart, Robert A.; Necchi, Andrea; Sweeney, Christopher J.; Garcia-Del-Muro, Xavier; Heng, Daniel Y. C.; Lorch, Anja; Chovanec, Michal; Winquist, Eric; Grimison, Peter; Feldman, Darren R.; Terbuch, Angelika; Hentrich, Marcus; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Negaard, Helene; Fankhauser, Christian; Shamash, Jonathan; Vaughn, David J.; Sternberg, Cora N.; Heidenreich, Axel; Beyer, Jörg; International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium; Medicine, School of MedicinePurpose: The classification of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) plays a pivotal role in the management of metastatic germ cell tumors but relies on data of patients treated between 1975 and 1990. Materials and methods: Data on 9,728 men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors treated with cisplatin- and etoposide-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2013 were collected from 30 institutions or collaborative groups in Europe, North America, and Australia. Clinical trial and registry data were included. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The survival estimates were updated for the current era. Additionally, a novel prognostic model for PFS was developed in 3,543 patients with complete information on potentially relevant variables. The results were validated in an independent data set. Results: Compared with the original IGCCCG publication, 5-year PFS remained similar in patients with good prognosis with 89% (87%-91%) versus 90% (95% CI, 89 to 91), but the 5-year OS increased from 92% (90%-94%) to 96% (95%-96%). In patients with intermediate prognosis, PFS remained similar with 75% (71%-79%) versus 78% (76%-80%) and the OS increased from 80% (76%-84%) to 89% (88%-91%). In patients with poor prognosis, the PFS increased from 41% (95% CI, 35 to 47) to 54% (95% CI, 52 to 56) and the OS from 48% (95% CI, 42 to 54) to 67% (95% CI, 65 to 69). A more granular prognostic model was developed and independently validated. This model identified a new cutoff of lactate dehydrogenase at a 2.5 upper limit of normal and increasing age and presence of lung metastases as additional adverse prognostic factors. An online calculator is provided (https://www.eortc.org/IGCCCG-Update). Conclusion: The IGCCCG Update model improves individual prognostication in metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Increasing age and lung metastases add granularity to the original IGCCCG classification as adverse prognostic factors.Item Risk of residual cancer after complete response following first-line chemotherapy in men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour and International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group intermediate/poor prognosis: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study(Elsevier, 2023-03) Antonelli, Luca; Ardizzone, Davide; Ravi, Praful; Bagrodia, Aditya; Mego, Michal; Daneshmand, Siamak; Nicolai, Nicola; Nazzani, Sebastiano; Giannatempo, Patrizia; Franza, Andrea; Heidenreich, Axel; Paffenholz, Pia; Saoud, Ragheed; Eggener, Scott; Ho, Matthew; Oswald, Nathaniel; Olson, Kathleen; Tryakin, Alexey; Fedyanin, Mikhail; Naoun, Natacha; Javaud, Christophe; Fizazi, Karim; King, Jennifer M.; Adra, Nabil; Douglawi, Antoin; Cary, Clint; Sweeney, Christopher; Fankhauser, Christian D.; Urology, School of MedicineIntroduction Current guidelines recommend surveillance in metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour patients treated with first-line-chemotherapy and a complete clinical response (normalisation of serum tumour markers and residual masses <1 cm). However, this recommendation is based on a series including patients with good prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group prognostic group (IGCCCG-PG). The aim of this study was to analyse the proportion of residual teratoma and survival among patients with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG and a complete clinical response after first-line-chemotherapy. Material & methods This is a retrospective study of men with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG, who had a complete clinical response after first-line chemotherapy. Patients were either followed by surveillance or treated with post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND). Results Between 2009 and 2018, 143 men with intermediate (n = 83) or poor (n = 60) IGCCCG-PG were treated at 11 international centres. Among 33 patients treated with pcRPLND, the specimen showed teratoma and viable cancer in 16 (48%) and 4 (12%). During a median a 7-year follow-up, 20/110 (18%) patients managed with surveillance relapsed, of whom seven (6%) had a retroperitoneal-only relapse versus 2/33 patients managed with pcRPLND relapsed. No difference was observed regarding overall survival (OS) among men treated with pcRPLND or surveillance (5-year OS, 93% and 89%, p-value = 0.35). The median time-to-recurrence among men on surveillance was 1.3 years (range: 0.3–9.1), and the most common sites of relapses included retroperitoneum (11%), chest (5%), and bones (4%). Conclusions While most men with intermediate/poor IGCCCG-PG harbour teratoma/cancer in the retroperitoneum despite a complete response to first-line-chemotherapy, only 6% managed with surveillance relapsed in the retroperitoneum. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups.Item Survival and New Prognosticators in Metastatic Seminoma: Results From the IGCCCG-Update Consortium(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021) Beyer, Jörg; Collette, Laurence; Sauvé, Nicolas; Daugaard, Gedske; Feldman, Darren R.; Tandstad, Torgrim; Tryakin, Alexey; Stahl, Olof; Gonzalez-Billalabeitia, Enrique; De Giorgi, Ugo; Culine, Stéphane; de Wit, Ronald; Hansen, Aaron R.; Bebek, Marko; Terbuch, Angelika; Albany, Costantine; Hentrich, Marcus; Gietema, Jourik A.; Negaard, Helene; Huddart, Robert A.; Lorch, Anja; Cafferty, Fay H.; Heng, Daniel Y. C.; Sweeney, Christopher J.; Winquist, Eric; Chovanec, Michal; Fankhauser, Christian; Stark, Daniel; Grimison, Peter; Necchi, Andrea; Tran, Ben; Heidenreich, Axel; Shamash, Jonathan; Sternberg, Cora N.; Vaughn, David J.; Duran, Ignacio; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Patrikidou, Anna; Cathomas, Richard; Assele, Samson; Gillessen, Silke; International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium; Medicine, School of MedicinePurpose: The classification of the International Germ-Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) has been a major advance in the management of germ-cell tumors, but relies on data of only 660 patients with seminoma treated between 1975 and 1990. We re-evaluated this classification in a database from a large international consortium. Materials and methods: Data on 2,451 men with metastatic seminoma treated with cisplatin- and etoposide-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2013 were collected from 30 institutions or collaborative groups in Australia, Europe, and North America. Clinical trial and registry data were included. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) calculated from day 1 of treatment. Variables at initial presentation were evaluated for their prognostic impact. Results were validated in an independent validation set of 764 additional patients. Results: Compared with the initial IGCCCG classification, in our modern series, 5-year PFS improved from 82% to 89% (95% CI, 87 to 90) and 5-year OS from 86% to 95% (95% CI, 94 to 96) in good prognosis, and from 67% to 79% (95% CI, 70 to 85) and 72% to 88% (95% CI, 80 to 93) in intermediate prognosis patients. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) proved to be an additional adverse prognostic factor. Good prognosis patients with LDH above 2.5× upper limit of normal had a 3-year PFS of 80% (95% CI, 75 to 84) and a 3-year OS of 92% (95% CI, 88 to 95) versus 92% (95% CI, 90 to 94) and 97% (95% CI, 96 to 98) in the group with lower LDH. Conclusion: PFS and OS in metastatic seminoma significantly improved in our modern series compared with the original data. The original IGCCCG classification retains its relevance, but can be further refined by adding LDH at a cutoff of 2.5× upper limit of normal as an additional adverse prognostic factor.