Browsing by Author "Harshman, Lyndsay A."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Developing a Research Mentorship Program: The American Society of Pediatric Nephrology's Experience
    (Frontiers, 2019-04-24) Vasylyeva, Tetyana L.; Díaz-González de Ferris, María E.; Hains, David S.; Ho, Jacqueline; Harshman, Lyndsay A.; Reidy, Kimberly J.; Brady, Tammy M.; Okamura, Daryl M.; Samsonov, Dmitry V.; Wenderfer, Scott E.; Hartung, Erum A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Most pediatric nephrologists work in academia. Mentor-mentee relationships provide support and guidance for successful research career. Mentorship program implementation is valuable in medical fields for providing research opportunities to young faculty. Methods: The American Society of Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN) established a research mentorship program to (a) assist with matching of appropriate mentor-mentee dyads and (b) establish metrics for desirable mentor-mentee outcomes with two independent components: (1) the grants review workshop, a short-term program providing mentor feedback on grant proposals, and (2) the longitudinal program, establishing long-term mentor-mentee relationships. Regular surveys of both mentors and mentees were reviewed to evaluate and refine the program. Results: Twelve mentees and 17 mentors participated in the grant review workshop and 19 mentees were matched to mentors in the longitudinal program. A review of NIH RePORTER data indicated that since 2014, 13 NIH grants have been awarded. Mentees in the longitudinal program reported that the program helped most with identifying an outside mentor, improving grant research content, and with general career development. Mentors perceived themselves to be most helpful in assisting with overall career plans. Email communications were preferred over phone or face-to-face communications. Mentees endorsed strong interest in staying in touch with their mentors and 100% of mentors expressed their willingness to serve in the future. Conclusion: This mentorship program was initiated and supported by a relatively small medical society and has shown early success in cultivating mentoring relationships for a future generation of clinician-scientists.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Responding to the workforce crisis: consensus recommendations from the Second Workforce Summit of the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology
    (Springer, 2024) Soranno, Danielle E.; Amaral, Sandra; Ashoor, Isa; Atkinson, Meredith A.; Barletta, Gina‑Marie; Braun, Michael C.; Carlson, Joann; Carter, Caitlin; Chua, Annabelle; Dharnidharka, Vikas R.; Drake, Keri; Erkan, Elif; Feig, Dan; Goldstein, Stuart L.; Hains, David; Harshman, Lyndsay A.; Ingulli, Elizabeth; Kula, Alexander J.; Leonard, Mary; Mannemuddhu, Sudha; Menon, Shina; Modi, Zubin J.; Moxey‑Mims, Marva; Nada, Arwa; Norwood, Victoria; Starr, Michelle C.; Verghese, Priya S.; Weidemann, Darcy; Weinstein, Adam; Smith, Jodi; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Importance: Pediatric patients with complex medical problems benefit from pediatric sub-specialty care; however, a significant proportion of children live greater than 80 mi. away from pediatric sub-specialty care. Objective: To identify current knowledge gaps and outline concrete next steps to make progress on issues that have persistently challenged the pediatric nephrology workforce. Evidence review: Workforce Summit 2.0 employed the round table format and methodology for consensus building using adapted Delphi principles. Content domains were identified via input from the ASPN Workforce Committee, the ASPN's 2023 Strategic Plan survey, the ASPN's Pediatric Nephrology Division Directors survey, and ongoing feedback from ASPN members. Working groups met prior to the Summit to conduct an organized literature review and establish key questions to be addressed. The Summit was held in-person in November 2023. During the Summit, work groups presented their preliminary findings, and the at-large group developed the key action statements and future directions. Findings: A holistic appraisal of the effort required to cover inpatient and outpatient sub-specialty care will help define faculty effort and time distribution. Most pediatric nephrologists practice in academic settings, so work beyond clinical care including education, research, advocacy, and administrative/service tasks may form a substantial amount of a faculty member's time and effort. An academic relative value unit (RVU) may assist in creating a more inclusive assessment of their contributions to their academic practice. Pediatric sub-specialties, such as nephrology, contribute to the clinical mission and care of their institutions beyond their direct billable RVUs. Advocacy throughout the field of pediatrics is necessary in order for reimbursement of pediatric sub-specialist care to accurately reflect the time and effort required to address complex care needs. Flexible, individualized training pathways may improve recruitment into sub-specialty fields such as nephrology. Conclusions and relevance: The workforce crisis facing the pediatric nephrology field is echoed throughout many pediatric sub-specialties. Efforts to improve recruitment, retention, and reimbursement are necessary to improve the care delivered to pediatric patients.