Browsing by Author "Harrison, Stephen A."
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Rinella, Mary E.; Lazarus, Jeffrey V.; Ratziu, Vlad; Francque, Sven M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Kanwal, Fasiha; Romero, Diana; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Arab, Juan Pablo; Arrese, Marco; Bataller, Ramon; Beuers, Ulrich; Boursier, Jerome; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Byrne, Christopher D.; Castro Narro, Graciela E.; Chowdhury, Abhijit; Cortez-Pinto, Helena; Cryer, Donna R.; Cusi, Kenneth; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Klein, Samuel; Eskridge, Wayne; Fan, Jiangao; Gawrieh, Samer; Guy, Cynthia D.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Kim, Seung Up; Koot, Bart G.; Korenjak, Marko; Kowdley, Kris V.; Lacaille, Florence; Loomba, Rohit; Mitchell-Thain, Robert; Morgan, Timothy R.; Powell, Elisabeth E.; Roden, Michael; Romero-Gómez, Manuel; Silva, Marcelo; Singh, Shivaram Prasad; Sookoian, Silvia C.; Spearman, C. Wendy; Tiniakos, Dina; Valenti, Luca; Vos, Miriam B.; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Xanthakos, Stavra; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Younossi, Zobair; Hobbs, Ansley; Villota-Rivas, Marcela; Newsome, Philip N.; NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group; Medicine, School of MedicineThe principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.Item Cirrhosis regression is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(Wiley, 2022) Sanyal, Arun J.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Trauner, Michael; Lawitz, Eric J.; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Ding, Dora; Han, Ling; Jia, Catherine; Huss, Ryan S.; Chung, Chuhan; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Okanoue, Takeshi; Romero-Gomez, Manuel; Muir, Andrew J.; Afdhal, Nezam H.; Bosch, Jaime; Goodman, Zachary; Harrison, Stephen A.; Younossi, Zobair M.; Myers, Robert P.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground and aims: Surrogate endpoints that predict complications are necessary for assessment and approval of NASH therapies. We assessed associations between histologic and noninvasive tests (NITs) of fibrosis with liver-related complications in patients with NASH cirrhosis. Approach and results: Patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH were enrolled in two placebo-controlled trials of simtuzumab and selonsertib. Liver fibrosis at baseline and week 48 (W48) was staged by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) and Ishak classifications and a machine learning (ML) approach, hepatic collagen and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression were quantified by morphometry, liver stiffness (LS) was measured by transient elastography, and serum NITs (enhanced liver fibrosis [ELF], NAFLD fibrosis score [NFS], and Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4]) were calculated. Cox regression determined associations between these parameters at baseline and their changes over time with adjudicated liver-related clinical events. Among 1,135 patients, 709 (62%) had Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and median ELF and LS were 10.66 and 21.1 kPa, respectively. During a median follow-up of 16.6 months, 71 (6.3%) had a liver-related event; associated baseline factors included Ishak stage 6 fibrosis, and higher hepatic collagen, α-SMA expression, ML-based fibrosis parameters, LS, ELF, NFS, and FIB-4. Cirrhosis regression observed in 16% (176/1,135) between BL and W48 was associated with a lower risk of events versus nonregression (1.1% [2/176] vs. 7.2% [69/957]; HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04, 0.65 [p = 0.0104]). Conversely, after adjustment for baseline values, increases in hepatic collagen, α-SMA, ML-based fibrosis parameters, NFS, and LS were associated with an increased risk of events. Conclusions: In patients with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH, regression of fibrosis is associated with a reduction in liver-related complications. These data support the utility of histologic fibrosis regression and NITs as clinical trial endpoints for NASH cirrhosis.Item Current and Future Therapeutic Regimens for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)(Wiley, 2018) Younossi, Zobair M.; Loomba, Rohit; Rinella, Mary E.; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Marchesini, Giulio; Neuschwander-Tetri, Brent A.; Serfaty, Lawrence; Negro, Francesco; Caldwell, Stephen H.; Ratziu, Vlad; Corey, Kathleen E.; Friedman, Scott L.; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Lavine, Joel E.; Mathurin, Philippe; Charlton, Michael R.; Chalasani, Naga P.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Kowdley, Kris V.; George, Jacob; Goodman, Zachary D.; Lindor, Keith; Medicine, School of MedicineNASH/NAFLD is rapidly becoming one of top causes of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and indication for liver transplantation. Except for life style modification through diet and exercise, there are currently no other approved treatments for NASH/NAFLD. Although weight loss can be effective, it is hard to achieve and sustain. In contrast, bariatric surgery can improve metabolic conditions associated with NAFLD and has been shown to improve liver histology. In order to have approved regimens for treatment of NASH/NAFLD, a number of issues that must be addressed. First, all stakeholders must agree on the most appropriate clinical trial endpoints for NASH. Currently, resolution of NASH (without worsening fibrosis) or reduction of fibrosis stage (without worsening NASH) are the accepted endpoints by the regulatory authorities. It is important to recognize the prognostic implication of histologic features of NASH. In this context, although histologic NASH has been associated with advanced stage of fibrosis, it is not an independent predictor of long term mortality. In contrast, there is significant data to suggest that stage of fibrosis is the only robust and independent predictor of liver-related mortality. In addition to the primary endpoints, a number of important secondary endpoints, including non-invasive biomarkers, long term outcomes, and patient reported outcomes, must be considered. In 2017, a few phase 3 clinical trials for treatment of NASH are in progress. Additionally, a number of phase 2a and 2b clinical trials targeting different pathogenic pathways in NASH enriches the pipeline of emerging therapies. Conclusion: Over the next 5 years, some of these regimens are expected to provide potential new treatment options for patients with NASH/NAFLD.Item The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases(Wiley, 2017) Chalasani, Naga; Younossi, Zobair; Lavine, Joel E.; Charlton, Michael; Cusi, Kenneth; Rinella, Mary; Harrison, Stephen A.; Brunt, Elizabeth M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Department of Medicine, School of MedicineThis guidance provides a data-supported approach to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of NAFLD care. A “Guidance” document is different from a “Guideline.” Guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts and rate the quality (level) of the evidence and the strength of each recommendation using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A guidance document is developed by a panel of experts in the topic, and guidance statements, not recommendations, are put forward to help clinicians understand and implement the most recent evidence.Item Diagnostic Modalities for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Associated Fibrosis(Wiley, 2018) Younossi, Zobair M.; Loomba, Rohit; Anstee, Quentin M.; Rinella, Mary E.; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Marchesini, Giulio; Neuschwander-Tetri, Brent A.; Serfaty, Lawrence; Negro, Francesco; Caldwell, Stephen H.; Ratziu, Vlad; Corey, Kathleen E.; Friedman, Scott L.; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Lavine, Joel E.; Mathurin, Philippe; Charlton, Michael R.; Goodman, Zachary D.; Chalasani, Naga P.; Kowdley, Kris V.; George, Jacob; Lindor, Keith; Medicine, School of MedicineNAFLD is a spectrum comprised of isolated steatosis, NASH, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The majority of NAFLD subjects do not have NASH and don't carry a significant risk for adverse outcomes (cirrhosis and mortality). Globally, the prevalence of NAFLD is approximately 25%. In Asia, a gradient of high prevalence rates to low rates are noted from urban to rural areas. Given the prevalence of NAFLD, the clinical and economic burden of NAFLD and NASH can be substantial. With increasing recognition as an important liver disease, the diagnosis of NASH still requires a liver biopsy which is suboptimal. Although liver biopsy is the most accurate modality to diagnose and stage the severity of NASH, it suffers from being invasive, costly, associated with potential complications, and plagued with interobserver variability of individual pathologic features. A number of non-invasive modalities to diagnose NASH and stage liver fibrosis are being developed. These include predictive models (NAFLD fibrosis score) and serum biomarkers such as Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, (ELF). Other tests are based on radiologic techniques such as transient or MR elastography (MRE) which are used to estimate liver stiffness as a potential surrogate of hepatic fibrosis. Although a dynamic field of research, most of these diagnostic modalities have AUROC between 0.76 to 0.90% with MRE having the best predictive performance. In summary, developing accurate, safe and easily accessible non-invasive modalities to accurately diagnose and monitor NASH and associated fibrosis is of utmost importance in clinical practice and clinical research. These tests are not only important to risk stratify subjects at the greatest risk for progressive liver disease but to serve as appropriate surrogate endpoints for therapeutic clinical trials of NASH.Item Effects of Belapectin, an Inhibitor of Galectin-3, in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension(Elsevier, 2020-04) Chalasani, Naga; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe; Vuppalanchi, Raj; Alkhouri, Naim; Rinella, Mary; Noureddin, Mazen; Pyko, Maxmillan; Shiffman, Mitchell; Sanyal, Arun; Allgood, Adam; Shlevin, Harold; Horton, Rex; Zomer, Eliezer; Irish, William; Goodman, Zachary; Harrison, Stephen A.; Traber, Peter G.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground & Aims Increased levels of galectin 3 have been associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and contribute to toxin-induced liver fibrosis in mice. GR-MD-02 (belapectin) is an inhibitor of galectin 3 that reduces liver fibrosis and portal hypertension in rats and was safe and well tolerated in phase 1 studies. We performed a phase 2b, randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of GR-MD-02 in patients with NASH, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension. Methods Patients with NASH, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥ 6 mm Hg) from 36 centers were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to groups that received biweekly infusions of belapectin 2 mg/kg (n = 54), 8 mg/kg (n = 54), or placebo (n = 54) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HVPG (Δ HVPG) at the end of the 52-week period compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in liver histology and development of liver-related outcomes. Results We found no significant difference in ΔHVPG between the 2 mg/kg belapectin group and placebo group (–0.28 mm HG vs 0.10 mm HG, P = 1.0) or between the 8 mg/kg belapectin and placebo group (–0.25 mm HG vs 0.10 mm HG, P = 1.0). Belapectin had no significant effect on fibrosis or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score, and liver-related outcomes did not differ significantly among groups. In an analysis of a subgroup of patients without esophageal varices at baseline (n = 81), 2 mg/kg belapectin was associated with a reduction in HVPG at 52 weeks compared with baseline (P = .02) and reduced development of new varices (P = .03). Belapectin (2 mg/kg) was well tolerated and produced no safety signals. Conclusions In a phase 2b study of 162 patients with NASH, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension, 1 year of biweekly infusion of belapectin was safe but not associated with significant reduction in HVPG or fibrosis compared with placebo. However, in a subgroup analysis of patients without esophageal varices, 2 mg/kg belapectin did reduce HVPG and development of varices.Item Machine learning liver histology scores correlate with portal hypertension assessments in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosi(Wiley, 2023) Noureddin, Mazen; Goodman, Zachary; Tai, Dean; Chng, Elaine L. K.; Ren, Yayun; Boudes, Pol; Shlevin, Harold; Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe; Harrison, Stephen A.; Chalasani, Naga P.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground and aims: In cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) clinical trials, primary efficacy endpoints have been hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), liver histology and clinical liver outcomes. Important histologic features, such as septa thickness, nodules features and fibrosis area have not been included in the histologic assessment and may have important clinical relevance. We assessed these features with a machine learning (ML) model. Methods: NASH patients with compensated cirrhosis and HVPG ≥6 mm Hg (n = 143) from the Belapectin phase 2b trial were studied. Liver biopsies, HVPG measurements and upper endoscopies were performed at baseline and at end of treatment (EOT). A second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence provided an automated quantitative assessment of septa, nodules and fibrosis (SNOF). We created ML scores and tested their association with HVPG, clinically significant HVPG (≥10 mm Hg) and the presence of varices (SNOF-V). Results: We derived 448 histologic variables (243 related to septa, 21 related to nodules and 184 related to fibrosis). The SNOF score (≥11.78) reliably distinguished CSPH at baseline and in the validation cohort (baseline + EOT) [AUC = 0.85 and 0.74, respectively]. The SNOF-V score (≥0.57) distinguished the presence of varices at baseline and in the same validation cohort [AUC = 0.86 and 0.73, respectively]. Finally, the SNOF-C score differentiated those who had >20% change in HVPG against those who did not, with an AUROC of 0.89. Conclusion: The ML algorithm accurately predicted HVPG, CSPH, the development of varices and HVPG changes in patients with NASH cirrhosis. The use of ML histology model in NASH cirrhosis trials may improve the assessment of key outcome changes.