Browsing by Author "Harrison, Theresa M."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Genetic and Sex Associations with Earlier Estimated Onset of Amyloid Positivity from over 4000 Harmonized Positron Emission Tomography Images
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Castellano, Tonnar; Wang, Ting Chen; Nolan, Emma; Archer, Derek B.; Cody, Karly; Harrison, Theresa M.; Wu, Yiyang; Durant, Alaina; Janve, Vaibhav A.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Jagust, William J.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Resnick, Susan M.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Bilgel, Murat; Saykin, Andrew J.; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Mayeux, Richard; Betthauser, Tobey J.; Dumitrescu, Logan C.; Mormino, Elizabeth; Hohman, Timothy J.; Koran, Mary Ellen I.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: New techniques have been developed to estimate the age when someone converted to amyloid positivity (EAOA) from PET, oftentimes offering information about a participant decades before they joined a research study. EAOA is variable across populations but we do not know the causes for these differences. This study aims to validate APOE associations with EAOA and explore genetic and sex‐based factors with EAOA. Methods: Data from six cohorts were analyzed. Our analysis included 4220 non‐Hispanic white people (57.6% women; 86.7% cognitively unimpaired at baseline scan). Amyloid PET data were harmonized using gaussian mixture models. EAOA was calculated using the sampled iterative local approximation (SILA) algorithm. Sex differences in EAOA were compared using t‐tests amongst amyloid positive individuals. A genome‐wide association study of EAOA was performed. Gene analyses were conducted using MAGMA. Results: Average EAOA was 81.1 years across all individuals regardless of amyloid status. APOE e2 homozygotes had slightly later EAOA than e3/e3 homozygotes. APOE e4 homozygotes converted to amyloid positivity 8.2 years before e3/e4 heterozygotes and over two decades earlier than e3 homozygotes. APOE e2/e4 converted to positivity roughly three years later than e3/e4 and nearly ten years earlier than e3 homozygotes. APOE genotype differences in EAOA described were statistically significant (p < .01). There were significant sex differences between men and women when examining amyloid positivity. Men converted to amyloid positivity over 2 years later than women (65.3 vs 63.2 years, p=3.23x10‐5). The rs12981369 polymorphism in ABCA7 was associated with EAOA (β = 2.14, p=9.27×10−9). Brain eQTL databases indicate associations between rs12981369 and gene expression of ABCA7. Gene‐level analyses revealed significant associations for ABCA7, HMHA1, and KIF13B. Conclusion: This study further describes the role of APOE and reveals roles for ABCA7 and KIF13B on amyloid onset. We identified a novel variant on chromosome 19 correlating with later amyloid onset conversion and highlight important differences between sexes. These findings highlight EAOA as a powerful endophenotype of AD and offer insights into potential drug‐targetable mechanisms for early AD intervention.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive resilience to Alzheimer's disease
    (Oxford University Press, 2022) Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Mahoney, Emily R.; Smith, Alexandra N.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Scollard, Phoebe; Choi, Seo Eun; Bush, William S.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Lu, Qiongshi; Fardo, David W.; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Kaczorowski, Catherine C.; Hernandez Saucedo, Hector; Widaman, Keith F.; Buckley, Rachel F.; Properzi, Michael J.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Yang, Hyun Sik; Harrison, Theresa M.; Hedden, Trey; Nho, Kwangsik; Andrews, Shea J.; Tommet, Douglas; Hadad, Niran; Sanders, R. Elizabeth; Ruderfer, Douglas M.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Zhong, Xiaoyuan; Raghavan, Neha S.; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); A4 Study Team; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li San; Cruchaga, Carlos; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Cox, Nancy J.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Larson, Eric B.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Mayeux, Richard; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Bennett, David A.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Approximately 30% of elderly adults are cognitively unimpaired at time of death despite the presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology at autopsy. Studying individuals who are resilient to the cognitive consequences of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology may uncover novel therapeutic targets to treat Alzheimer's disease. It is well established that there are sex differences in response to Alzheimer's disease pathology, and growing evidence suggests that genetic factors may contribute to these differences. Taken together, we sought to elucidate sex-specific genetic drivers of resilience. We extended our recent large scale genomic analysis of resilience in which we harmonized cognitive data across four cohorts of cognitive ageing, in vivo amyloid PET across two cohorts, and autopsy measures of amyloid neuritic plaque burden across two cohorts. These data were leveraged to build robust, continuous resilience phenotypes. With these phenotypes, we performed sex-stratified [n (males) = 2093, n (females) = 2931] and sex-interaction [n (both sexes) = 5024] genome-wide association studies (GWAS), gene and pathway-based tests, and genetic correlation analyses to clarify the variants, genes and molecular pathways that relate to resilience in a sex-specific manner. Estimated among cognitively normal individuals of both sexes, resilience was 20-25% heritable, and when estimated in either sex among cognitively normal individuals, resilience was 15-44% heritable. In our GWAS, we identified a female-specific locus on chromosome 10 [rs827389, β (females) = 0.08, P (females) = 5.76 × 10-09, β (males) = -0.01, P(males) = 0.70, β (interaction) = 0.09, P (interaction) = 1.01 × 10-04] in which the minor allele was associated with higher resilience scores among females. This locus is located within chromatin loops that interact with promoters of genes involved in RNA processing, including GATA3. Finally, our genetic correlation analyses revealed shared genetic architecture between resilience phenotypes and other complex traits, including a female-specific association with frontotemporal dementia and male-specific associations with heart rate variability traits. We also observed opposing associations between sexes for multiple sclerosis, such that more resilient females had a lower genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis, and more resilient males had a higher genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Overall, we identified sex differences in the genetic architecture of resilience, identified a female-specific resilience locus and highlighted numerous sex-specific molecular pathways that may underly resilience to Alzheimer's disease pathology. This study illustrates the need to conduct sex-aware genomic analyses to identify novel targets that are unidentified in sex-agnostic models. Our findings support the theory that the most successful treatment for an individual with Alzheimer's disease may be personalized based on their biological sex and genetic context.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The prevalence of tau‐PET positivity in aging and dementia
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Coomans, Emma M.; Groot, Colin; Rowe, Christopher C.; Dore, Vincent; Villemagne, Victor L.; van de Giessen, Elsmarieke; van der Flier, Wiesje M.; Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.; Visser, Pieter Jelle; den Braber, Anouk; Pontecorvo, Michael; Shcherbinin, Sergey; Kennedy, Ian A.; Jagust, William J.; Baker, Suzanne L.; Harrison, Theresa M.; Gispert, Juan Domingo; Shekari, Mahnaz; Minguillon, Carolina; Smith, Ruben; Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas; Palmqvist, Sebastian; Strandberg, Olof; Stomrud, Erik; Malpetti, Maura; O'Brien, John T.; Rowe, James B.; Jäger, Elena; Bischof, Gérard N.; Drzezga, Alexander; Garibotto, Valentina; Frisoni, Giovanni; Peretti, Débora Elisa; Schöll, Michael; Skoog, Ingmar; Kern, Silke; Sperling, Reisa A.; Johnson, Keith A.; Risacher, Shannon L.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Carrillo, Maria C.; Dickerson, Brad C.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Barthel, Henryk; Rullmann, Michael; Messerschmidt, Konstantin; Vandenberghe, Rik; Van Laere, Koen; Spruyt, Laure; Franzmeier, Nicolai; Brendel, Matthias; Gnörich, Johannes; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Lagarde, Julien; Sarazin, Marie; Bottlaender, Michel; Villeneuve, Sylvia; Poirier, Judes; Seo, Sang Won; Gu, Yuna; Kim, Jun Pyo; Mormino, Elizabeth; Young, Christina B.; Vossler, Hillary; Rosa-Neto, Pedro; Therriault, Joseph; Rahmouni, Nesrine; Coath, William; Cash, David M.; Schott, Jonathan M.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; La Joie, Renaud; Rosen, Howard J.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Christian, Bradley T.; Betthauser, Tobey J.; Hansson, Oskar; Ossenkoppele, Rik; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background Tau‐PET imaging allows in‐vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles. One tau‐PET tracer (i.e., [18F]flortaucipir) has received FDA‐approval for clinical use, and multiple other tau‐PET tracers have been implemented into clinical trials for participant selection and/or as a primary or secondary outcome measure. To optimize future use of tau‐PET, it is essential to understand how demographic, clinical and genetic factors affect tau‐PET‐positivity rates. Method This large‐scale multi‐center study includes 9713 participants from 35 cohorts worldwide who underwent tau‐PET with [18F]flortaucipir (n = 6420), [18F]RO948 (n = 1999), [18F]MK6240 (n = 878) or [18F]PI2620 (n = 416) (Table‐1). We analyzed individual‐level tau‐PET SUVR data using a cerebellar reference region that were processed either centrally (n = 3855) or by each cohort (n = 5858). We computed cohort‐specific SUVR thresholds based on the mean + 2 standard deviations in a temporal meta‐region of amyloid‐negative cognitively normal (CN) individuals aged >50. Logistic generalized estimating equations were used to estimate tau‐PET‐positivity probabilities, using an exchangeable correlation structure to account for within‐cohort correlations. Analyses were performed with (interactions between) age, amyloid‐status, and APOE‐e4 carriership as independent variables, stratified for syndrome diagnosis. Result The study included 5962 CN participants (7.5% tau‐PET‐positive), 1683 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, 33.8% tau‐PET‐positive) and 2068 participants with a clinical diagnosis of dementia (62.1% tau‐PET‐positive) (Figure‐1). From age 60 to 80 years, the estimated prevalence of tau‐PET‐positivity increased from 1.2% [95% CI: 0.9%‐1.5%] to 3.7% [2.3%‐5.1%] among CN amyloid‐negative participants; and from 16.4% [10.8%‐22.1%] to 20.5% [18.8%‐22.2%] among CN amyloid‐positive participants. Among amyloid‐negative participants with MCI and dementia, from age 60 to 80 years, the estimated prevalence of tau‐PET‐positivity increased from 3.5% [1.6%‐5.3%] to 11.8% [7.1%‐16.5%] and from 12.6% [4.5%‐20.7%] to 15.9% [6.7%‐25.1%] respectively. In contrast, among amyloid‐positive participants with MCI and dementia, from age 60 to 80 years, the estimated prevalence of tau‐PET‐positivity decreased from 66.5% [57.0%‐76.0%] to 48.3% [42.9%‐53.8%] and from 92.3% [88.7%‐95.9%] to 73.4% [67.5%‐79.3%] respectively. APOE‐e4 status primarily modulated the association of age with tau‐PET‐positivity estimates among CN and MCI amyloid‐positive participants (Figure‐2). Conclusion This large‐scale multi‐cohort study provides robust prevalence estimates of tau‐PET‐positivity, which can aid the interpretation of tau‐PET in the clinic and inform clinical trial designs.