Browsing by Author "Harris, Mark"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    IL-6 receptor blockade does not slow β cell loss in new-onset type 1 diabetes
    (American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2021) Greenbaum, Carla J.; Serti, Elisavet; Lambert, Katharina; Weiner, Lia J.; Kanaparthi, Sai; Lord, Sandra; Gitelman, Stephen E.; Wilson, Darrell M.; Gaglia, Jason L.; Griffin, Kurt J.; Russell, William E.; Raskin, Philip; Moran, Antoinette; Willi, Steven M.; Tsalikian, Eva; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Herold, Kevan C.; Moore, Wayne V.; Goland, Robin; Harris, Mark; Craig, Maria E.; Schatz, Desmond A.; Baidal, David A.; Rodriguez, Henry; Utzschneider, Kristina M.; Nel, Hendrik J.; Soppe, Carol L.; Boyle, Karen D.; Cerosaletti, Karen; Keyes-Elstein, Lynette; Long, S. Alice; Thomas, Ranjeny; McNamara, James G.; Buckner, Jane H.; Sanda, Srinath; ITN058AI EXTEND Study Team; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signaling drives development of T cell populations important to type 1 diabetes pathogenesis. We evaluated whether blockade of IL-6R with monoclonal antibody tocilizumab would slow loss of residual β cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with tocilizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Participants were screened within 100 days of diagnosis. Eligible participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 7 monthly doses of tocilizumab or placebo. The primary outcome was the change from screening in the mean AUC of C-peptide collected during the first 2 hours of a mixed meal tolerance test at week 52 in pediatric participants (ages 6–17 years). Results: There was no statistical difference in the primary outcome between tocilizumab and placebo. Immunophenotyping showed reductions in downstream signaling of the IL-6R in T cells but no changes in CD4 memory subsets, Th17 cells, Tregs, or CD4+ T effector cell resistance to Treg suppression. A DC subset decreased during therapy but regressed to baseline once therapy stopped. Tocilizumab was well tolerated. Conclusion: Tocilizumab reduced T cell IL-6R signaling but did not modulate CD4+ T cell phenotypes or slow loss of residual β cell function in newly diagnosed individuals with type 1 diabetes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    OR21-06 Growth Response Of Oral LUM-201 In OraGrowtH210 And OraGrowtH212 Trials In Idiopathic Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency (iPGHD): Combined Analysis Interim Analysis Data
    (The Endocrine Society, 2023-10-05) Tansey, Michael J.; Bowden, Sasigarn Arunchaiya; Dauber, Andrew Nahum; Wikiera, Beata; Pyrzak, Beata; Bossowski, Artur T.; Petriczko, Elzbieta; Stawerska, Renata; Moszczynska, Elzbieta; Cassorla, Fernando; Feldt, Matthew M.; Lunsford, Alison J.; Gottschalk, Michael Everett; Marin, Monica; Nayak, Sunil N.; Bhuvana, Sunil; Repaske, David Roy; Soyka, Leslie Ann; Fuqua, John S.; Escobar, Oscar; Bowlby, Deborah A.; Fechner, Patricia Y.; Wiltshire, Esko; Harris, Mark; Wintergerst, Kupper A.; Lafferty, Antony Richard A.; Miller, Bradley S.; Simm, Peter; Bruchey, Aleksandra; Smith, Christopher; Karpf, David B.; McKew, John C.; Thorner, Michael O.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: LUM-201 (ibutamoren), a growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a) agonist, is a potent, long-acting investigational oral GH secretagogue currently studied in three Idiopathic Pediatric GH Deficiency (iPGHD) studies. The LUM-201 predictive enrichment marker (PEM) is used to identify patients diagnosed with iPGHD (peak stimulated GH >3<10 ng/mL) who are likely to respond to LUM-201. PEM positivity is defined as a baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level >30 ng/mL and a peak GH of ≥5 ng/mL in response to a single 0.8 mg/kg dose of LUM-201. Objectives: Report the growth response analyzing the combined interim analysis (IA) data from two Phase 2 trials studying LUM-201 at two different doses (1.6 mg/kg/day or 3.2 mg/kg/day). Methods: IA data from both studies were combined and analyzed for calculated annualized height velocity (AHV). Baseline demographics were analyzed for the two combined cohorts. Results: After 6 months of treatment with LUM-201, the calculated AHV (mean ±SD ) was 8.1±1.9 cm/year in the 1.6 mg/kg/day group and 8.0±1.5 cm/year in the 3.2 mg/kg/day group (N=15 in both groups). After 9 months of treatment, the calculated AHV was 7.8±1.7 cm/year in the 1.6 mg/kg/day group and 7.3±1.7 cm/year in the 3.2 mg/kg/day group (N=10 in both groups). After 12 months of treatment, the calculated AHV was 7.8±1.7 cm/year in the 1.6 mg/kg/day group and 7.4 ±1.2 cm/year in the 3.2 mg/kg/day group (N=6 in both groups). LUM-201 was well tolerated; no safety concerns were identified across the dose range in adverse events (AE) data, laboratory values, and ECG values. Conclusions: As the growth velocity was comparable for the two doses of oral LUM-201, this analysis of the combined IA data appears to strongly support 1.6 mg/kg/day as the optimal dose for the Phase 3 trial, as doubling the dose appeared to offer no meaningful improvement in efficacy. Final determination will await final full data set analysis of both studies.