Browsing by Author "Harmon, Kimberly G."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Interassociation Consensus Statement on Cardiovascular Care of College Student-Athletes
    (American College of Cardiology Foundation, 2016-04) Hainline, Brian; Drezner, Jonathan; Baggish, Aaron; Harmon, Kimberly G.; Emery, Michael S.; Myerburg, Robert J.; Sanchez, Eduardo; Molossi, Silvana; Parsons, John T.; Thompson, Paul D.; Kinesiology, School of Physical Education and Tourism Management
    Cardiovascular evaluation and care of college student-athletes is gaining increasing attention from both the public and medical communities. Emerging strategies include screening of the general athlete population, recommendations of permissible levels of participation by athletes with identified cardiovascular conditions, and preparation for responding to unanticipated cardiac events in athletic venues. The primary focus has been sudden cardiac death and the utility of screening with or without advanced cardiac screening. The National Collegiate Athletic Association convened a multidisciplinary task force to address cardiovascular concerns in collegiate student-athletes and to develop consensus for an interassociation statement. This document summarizes the task force deliberations and follow-up discussions, and includes available evidence on cardiovascular risk, pre-participation evaluation, and the recognition of and response to cardiac arrest. Future recommendations for cardiac research initiatives, education, and collaboration are also provided.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    International Criteria for Electrocardiographic Interpretation in Athletes
    (Elsevier, 2017-02) Sharma, Sanjay; Drezner, Jonathan A.; Baggish, Aaron; Papadakis, Michael; Wilson, Mathew G.; Prutkin, Jordan M.; La Gerche, Andre; Ackerman, Michael J.; Borjesson, Mats; Salerno, Jack C.; Asif, Irfan M.; Owens, David S.; Chung, Eugene H.; Emery, Michael S.; Froelicher, Victor F.; Heidbuchel, Hein; Adamuz, Carmen; Asplund, Chad A.; Cohen, Gordon; Harmon, Kimberly G.; Marek, Joseph C.; Molossi, Silvana; Niebauer, Josef; Pelto, Hank F.; Perez, Marco V.; Riding, Nathan R.; Saarel, Tess; Schmied, Christian M.; Shipon, David M.; Stein, Ricardo; Vetter, Victoria L.; Pelliccia, Antonio; Corrado, Domenico; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of mortality in athletes during sport. A variety of mostly hereditary, structural, or electrical cardiac disorders are associated with SCD in young athletes, the majority of which can be identified or suggested by abnormalities on a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Whether used for diagnostic or screening purposes, physicians responsible for the cardiovascular care of athletes should be knowledgeable and competent in ECG interpretation in athletes. However, in most countries a shortage of physician expertise limits wider application of the ECG in the care of the athlete. A critical need exists for physician education in modern ECG interpretation that distinguishes normal physiological adaptations in athletes from distinctly abnormal findings suggestive of underlying pathology. Since the original 2010 European Society of Cardiology recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes, ECG standards have evolved quickly over the last decade; pushed by a growing body of scientific data that both tests proposed criteria sets and establishes new evidence to guide refinements. On February 26-27, 2015, an international group of experts in sports cardiology, inherited cardiac disease, and sports medicine convened in Seattle, Washington, to update contemporary standards for ECG interpretation in athletes. The objective of the meeting was to define and revise ECG interpretation standards based on new and emerging research and to develop a clear guide to the proper evaluation of ECG abnormalities in athletes. This statement represents an international consensus for ECG interpretation in athletes and provides expert opinion-based recommendations linking specific ECG abnormalities and the secondary evaluation for conditions associated with SCD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    King-Devick testing and concussion recovery time in collegiate athletes
    (Elsevier, 2022) Whelan, Bridget M.; Gause, Emma L.; Ortega, Justus D.; Mills, Brianna M.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Kaminski, Thomas W.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Breedlove, Katherine M.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Clugston, James R.; Goldman, Joshua T.; Harmon, Kimberly G.; McCrea, Michael A.; McAllister, Thomas W.; Broglio, Steven P.; Chrisman, Sara P. D.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Objectives: To assess whether the King-Devick (KD) test is useful as a prognostic test for prolonged concussion symptoms by examining the relationship between a) change in performance on KD test from baseline to within two days post-injury and b) the absolute KD time at post-concussion testing, with an outcome of time to return to play (RTP). Design: Prospective Cohort Study. Methods: Collegiate varsity athletes in the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium completed baseline and post-injury King-Devick tests from 2014 to 2018. Two exposures were evaluated: 1) change in KD score from baseline to within two days post-injury and 2) absolute KD score within two days post-injury, adjusted for baseline KD. We used Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the relationships between these exposures and time to RTP post-concussion. Results: A total of 309 concussion injuries were included. Median baseline KD score was 40.0 s (IQR: 35.8, 45.2). Median post-injury KD score was 45.8 s (IQR: 39.8, 57.1). Median number of days until RTP in this cohort was 11 (IQR: 8, 17). Post-injury KD score adjusted for baseline KD had a stronger association with time to RTP duration (HR: 0.99 (0.98, 1.00), p = 0.03) than the difference in KD score from baseline to post-injury (HR: 0.99 (0.99, 1.00), p = 0.07). Conclusions: Higher post-injury KD scores are associated with longer RTP. The association between KD post-concussion test and longer RTP warrants further investigation to assess the utility of the KD for prognostication in a clinical setting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Relationship Between the King-Devick Test and Commonly Used Concussion Tests at Baseline
    (Allen Press, 2019-12) Clugston, James R.; Houck, Zachary M.; Asken, Breton M.; Boone, Jonathan K.; Kontos, Anthony P.; Buckley, Thomas A.; Schmidt, Julianne D.; Chrisman, Sara P.D.; Hoffman, Nicole L.; Harmon, Kimberly G.; Kaminski, Thomas W.; Collins, Michael W.; McAllister, Thomas W.; McCrea, Michael A.; Broglio, Steven P.; Ortega, Justus D.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Context: Comprehensive assessments are recommended to evaluate sport-related concussion (SRC). The degree to which the King-Devick (KD) test adds novel information to an SRC evaluation is unknown. Objective: To describe relationships at baseline among the KD and other SRC assessments and explore whether the KD provides unique information to a multimodal baseline concussion assessment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Five National Collegiate Athletic Association institutions participating in the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Patients or other participants: National Collegiate Athletic Association student-athletes (N = 2258, age = 20 ± 1.5 years, 53.0% male, 68.9% white) in 11 men's and 13 women's sports. Main outcome measure(s): Participants completed baseline assessments on the KD and (1) the Symptom Inventory of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3rd edition, (2) the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, (3) the Balance Error Scoring System, (4) the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), (5) the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test battery, and (6) the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening tool during their first year in CARE. Correlation coefficients between the KD and the 6 other concussion assessments in isolation were determined. Assessments with ρ magnitude >0.1 were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis to evaluate their relative association with the KD. Results: Scores for SAC concentration, ImPACT visual motor speed, and ImPACT reaction time were correlated with the KD (ρ = -0.216, -0.276, and 0.164, respectively) and were thus included in the regression model, which explained 16.8% of the variance in baseline KD time (P < .001, Cohen f2 = 0.20). Better SAC concentration score (β = -.174, P < .001), ImPACT visual motor speed (β = -.205, P < .001), and ImPACT reaction time (β = .056, P = .020) were associated with faster baseline KD performance, but the effect sizes were small. Conclusions: Better performance on cognitive measures involving concentration, visual motor speed, and reaction time was weakly associated with better baseline KD performance. Symptoms, psychological distress, balance, and vestibular-oculomotor provocation were unrelated to KD performance at baseline. The findings indicate limited overlap at baseline among the CARE SRC assessments and the KD.