Browsing by Author "Harbour, J. William"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ASXL1 interacts with the cohesin complex to maintain chromatid separation and gene expression for normal hematopoiesis
    (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2017-01-20) Li, Zhaomin; Zhang, Peng; Yan, Aimin; Guo, Zhengyu; Ban, Yuguang; Li, Jin; Chen, Shi; Yang, Hui; He, Yongzheng; Li, Jianping; Guo, Ying; Zhang, Wen; Hajiramezanali, Ehsan; An, Huangda; Fajardo, Darlene; Harbour, J. William; Ruan, Yijun; Nimer, Stephen D.; Yu, Peng; Chen, Xi; Xu, Mingjiang; Yang, Feng-Chun; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    ASXL1 is frequently mutated in a spectrum of myeloid malignancies with poor prognosis. Loss of Asxl1 leads to myelodysplastic syndrome-like disease in mice; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We report that ASXL1 interacts with the cohesin complex, which has been shown to guide sister chromatid segregation and regulate gene expression. Loss of Asxl1 impairs the cohesin function, as reflected by an impaired telophase chromatid disjunction in hematopoietic cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by DNA sequencing data revealed that ASXL1, RAD21, and SMC1A share 93% of genomic binding sites at promoter regions in Lin-cKit+ (LK) cells. We have shown that loss of Asxl1 reduces the genome binding of RAD21 and SMC1A and alters the expression of ASXL1/cohesin target genes in LK cells. Our study underscores the ASXL1-cohesin interaction as a novel means to maintain normal sister chromatid separation and regulate gene expression in hematopoietic cells.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An international survey of classification and treatment choices for group D retinoblastoma
    (IJO Press, 2017-06-18) Scelfo, Christina; Francis, Jasmine H.; Khetan, Vikas; Jenkins, Thomas; Marr, Brian; Abramson, David H.; Shields, Carol L.; Pe’er, Jacob; Munier, Francis; Berry, Jesse; Harbour, J. William; Yarovoy, Andrey; Lucena, Evandro; Murray, Timothy G.; Bhagia, Pooja; Paysse, Evelyn; Tuncer, Samuray; Chantada, Guillermo L.; Moll, Annette C.; Ushakova, Tatiana; Plager, David A.; Ziyovuddin, Islamov; Leal, Carlos A.; Materin, Miguel A; Ji, Xun-Da; Cursino, Jose W.; Polania, Rodrigo; Kiratli, Hayyam; All-Ericsson, Charlotta; Kebudi, Rejin; Honavar, Santosh G.; Vishnevskia-Dai, Vicktoria; Epelman, Sidnel; Daniels, Anthony B.; Ling, Jeanie D.; Traore, Fousseyni; Ramirez-Ortiz, Marco A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    AIM: To determine which IIRC scheme was used by retinoblastoma centers worldwide and the percentage of D eyes treated primarily with enucleation versus globe salvaging therapies as well as to correlate trends in treatment choice to IIRC version used and geographic region. METHODS: An anonymized electronic survey was offered to 115 physicians at 39 retinoblastoma centers worldwide asking about IIRC classification schemes and treatment patterns used between 2008 and 2012. Participants were asked to record which version of the IIRC was used for classification, how many group D eyes were diagnosed, and how many eyes were treated with enucleation versus globe salvaging therapies. Averages of eyes per treatment modality were calculated and stratified by both IIRC version and geographic region. Statistical significance was determined by Chi-square, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests using Prism. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 29% of physicians invited to participate. Totally 1807 D eyes were diagnosed. Regarding IIRC system, 27% of centers used the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (CHLA) version, 33% used the Children's Oncology Group (COG) version, 23% used the Philadelphia version, and 17% were unsure. The rate for primary enucleation varied between 0 and 100% and the mean was 29%. By IIRC version, primary enucleation rates were: Philadelphia, 8%; COG, 34%; and CHLA, 37%. By geographic region, primary enucleation rates were: Latin America, 57%; Asia, 40%; Europe, 36%; Africa, 10%, US, 8%; and Middle East, 8%. However, systemic chemoreduction was used more often than enucleation in all regions except Latin America with a mean of 57% per center (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Worldwide there is no consensus on which IIRC version is used, systemic chemoreduction was the most frequently used initial treatment during the study period followed by enucleation and primary treatment modality, especially enucleation, varied greatly with regards to IIRC version used and geographic region.