Browsing by Author "Hammer, Peter M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Asynchronous Conferencing Through a Secure Messaging Application Increases Reporting of Medical Errors in a Mature Trauma Center
    (Sage, 2023) Lee, Joy L.; Isenberg, Scott; Adams, Georgann; Thurston, Maria; Hammer, Peter M.; Mohanty, Sanjay K.; Jenkins, Peter C.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Medical errors occur frequently, yet they are often under-reported and strategies to increase the reporting of medical errors are lacking. In this work, we detail how a level 1 trauma center used a secure messaging application to track medical errors and enhance its quality improvement initiatives. Methods: We describe the formulation, implementation, evolution, and evaluation of a chatroom integrated into a secure texting system to identify performance improvement and patient safety (PIPS) concerns. For evaluation, we used descriptive statistics to examine PIPS reporting by the reporting method over time, the incidence of mortality and unplanned ICU readmissions tracked in the hospital trauma registry over the same, and time-to-loop closure over the study period to quantify the impact of the processes instituted by the PIPS team. We also categorized themes of reported events. Results: With the implementation of a PIPS chatroom, the number of events reported each month increased and texting became the predominant way for users to report trauma PIPS events. This increase in PIPS reporting did not appear to be accompanied by an increase in mortality and unplanned ICU readmissions. The PIPS team also improved the tracking and timely resolution of PIPS events and observed a decrease in time-to-loop closure with the implementation of the PIPS chatroom. Conclusions: The adoption of clinical texting as a way to report PIPS events was associated with increased reporting of such events and more timely resolution of concerns regarding patient safety and healthcare quality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Increased Trauma Activation Is Not Equally Beneficial For All Elderly Trauma Patients
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2018-05) Carr, Bryan W.; Hammer, Peter M.; Timsina, Lava; Rozycki, Grace; Feliciano, David V.; Coleman, Jamie J.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background Physiologic changes in the elderly lead to higher morbidity and mortality after injury. Increasing level of trauma activation has been proposed to improve geriatric outcomes; but, the increased cost to the patient and stress to the hospital system are significant downsides. The purpose of this study was to identify the age at which an increase in activation status is beneficial. Methods A retrospective review of trauma patients ≥ 70 years old from October 1, 2011, to October 1, 2016 was performed. On October 1, 2013, a policy change increased the activation criteria to the highest level for patients ≥ 70 years of age with a significant mechanism of injury. Patients who presented prior to (PRE) were compared to those after the change (POST). Data collected included age, injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), complications and mortality. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcome was LOS. Multivariable regressions controlled for age, ISS, injury mechanism, and number of complications. Results 4341 patients met inclusion criteria, 1919 in PRE and 2422 in POST. Mean age was 80.4 and 81 years in PRE and POST groups respectively (p=0.0155). Mean ISS values were 11.6 and 12.4 (p<0.0001) for the PRE and POST groups. POST had more level 1 activations (696 vs. 220, p<0.0001). After controlling for age, ISS, mechanism of injury, and number of complications, mortality was significantly reduced in the POST group ≥ age 77 years (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.3 - 0.87), (Figure 1). Hospital LOS was significantly reduced in the POST group ≥ age 78 (regression coefficient -0.55, 95% CI: -1.09, -0.01) (Figure 2). Conclusions This study suggests geriatric trauma patients ≥ 77 years benefit from the highest level of trauma activation with shorter LOS and lower mortality. A focused approach to increasing activation level for elderly patients may decrease patient cost. Level of Evidence Level III Type of Study Economic/Decision