Browsing by Author "Hallman, Mark A."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Stress testing deep learning models for prostate cancer detection on biopsies and surgical specimens
    (Wiley, 2025) Flannery, Brennan T.; Sandler, Howard M.; Lal, Priti; Feldman, Michael D.; Santa-Rosario, Juan C.; Pathak, Tilak; Mirtti, Tuomas; Farre, Xavier; Correa, Rohann; Chafe, Susan; Shah, Amit; Efstathiou, Jason A.; Hoffman, Karen; Hallman, Mark A.; Straza, Michael; Jordan, Richard; Pugh, Stephanie L.; Feng, Felix; Madabhushi, Anant; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    The presence, location, and extent of prostate cancer is assessed by pathologists using H&E-stained tissue slides. Machine learning approaches can accomplish these tasks for both biopsies and radical prostatectomies. Deep learning approaches using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been shown to identify cancer in pathologic slides, some securing regulatory approval for clinical use. However, differences in sample processing can subtly alter the morphology between sample types, making it unclear whether deep learning algorithms will consistently work on both types of slide images. Our goal was to investigate whether morphological differences between sample types affected the performance of biopsy-trained cancer detection CNN models when applied to radical prostatectomies and vice versa using multiple cohorts (N = 1,000). Radical prostatectomies (N = 100) and biopsies (N = 50) were acquired from The University of Pennsylvania to train (80%) and validate (20%) a DenseNet CNN for biopsies (MB), radical prostatectomies (MR), and a combined dataset (MB+R). On a tile level, MB and MR achieved F1 scores greater than 0.88 when applied to their own sample type but less than 0.65 when applied across sample types. On a whole-slide level, models achieved significantly better performance on their own sample type compared to the alternative model (p < 0.05) for all metrics. This was confirmed by external validation using digitized biopsy slide images from a clinical trial [NRG Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)] (NRG/RTOG 0521, N = 750) via both qualitative and quantitative analyses (p < 0.05). A comprehensive review of model outputs revealed morphologically driven decision making that adversely affected model performance. MB appeared to be challenged with the analysis of open gland structures, whereas MR appeared to be challenged with closed gland structures, indicating potential morphological variation between the training sets. These findings suggest that differences in morphology and heterogeneity necessitate the need for more tailored, sample-specific (i.e. biopsy and surgical) machine learning models.