Browsing by Author "Haldeman-Englert, Chad R."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A dyadic approach to the delineation of diagnostic entities in clinical genomics
    (Cell Press, 2021-01-07) Biesecker, Leslie G.; Adam, Margaret P.; Alkuraya, Fowzan S.; Amemiya, Anne R.; Bamshad, Michael J.; Beck, Anita E.; Bennett, James T.; Bird, Lynne M.; Carey, John C.; Chung, Brian; Clark, Robin D.; Cox, Timothy C.; Curry, Cynthia; Palko Dinulos, Mary Beth; Dobyns, William B.; Giampietro, Philip F.; Girisha, Katta M.; Glass, Ian A.; Graham, John M., Jr.; Gripp, Karen W.; Haldeman-Englert, Chad R.; Hall, Bryan D.; Innes, A. Micheil; Kalish, Jennifer M.; Keppler-Noreuil, Kim M.; Kosaki, Kenjiro; Kozel, Beth A.; Mirzaa, Ghayda M.; Mulvihill, John J.; Nowaczyk, Malgorzata J.M.; Pagon, Roberta A.; Retterer, Kyle; Rope, Alan F.; Sanchez-Lara, Pedro A.; Seaver, Laurie H.; Shieh, Joseph T.; Slavotinek, Anne M.; Sobering, Andrew K.; Stevens, Cathy A.; Stevenson, David A.; Tan, Tiong Yang; Tan, Wen-Hann; Tsai, Anne C.; Weaver, David D.; Williams, Marc S.; Zackai, Elaine; Zarate, Yuri A.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    The delineation of disease entities is complex, yet recent advances in the molecular characterization of diseases provide opportunities to designate diseases in a biologically valid manner. Here, we have formalized an approach to the delineation of Mendelian genetic disorders that encompasses two distinct but inter-related concepts: (1) the gene that is mutated and (2) the phenotypic descriptor, preferably a recognizably distinct phenotype. We assert that only by a combinatorial or dyadic approach taking both of these attributes into account can a unitary, distinct genetic disorder be designated. We propose that all Mendelian disorders should be designated as "GENE-related phenotype descriptor" (e.g., "CFTR-related cystic fibrosis"). This approach to delineating and naming disorders reconciles the complexity of gene-to-phenotype relationships in a simple and clear manner yet communicates the complexity and nuance of these relationships.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Response to Hamosh et al
    (Elsevier, 2021) Biesecker, Leslie G.; Adam, Margaret P.; Alkuraya, Fowzan S.; Amemiya, Anne R.; Bamshad, Michael J.; Beck, Anita E.; Bennett, James T.; Bird, Lynne M.; Carey, John C.; Chung, Brian; Clark, Robin D.; Cox, Timothy C.; Curry, Cynthia; Dinulos, Mary Beth Palko; Dobyns, William B.; Giampietro, Philip F.; Girisha, Katta M.; Glass, Ian A.; Graham, John M., Jr.; Gripp, Karen W.; Haldeman-Englert, Chad R.; Hall, Bryan D.; Innes, A. Micheil; Kalish, Jennifer M.; Keppler-Noreuil, Kim M.; Kosaki, Kenjiro; Kozel, Beth A.; Mirzaa, Ghayda M.; Mulvihill, John J.; Nowaczyk, Malgorzata J.M.; Pagon, Roberta A.; Retterer, Kyle; Rope, Alan F.; Sanchez-Lara, Pedro A.; Seaver, Laurie H.; Shieh, Joseph T.; Slavotinek, Anne M.; Sobering, Andrew K.; Stevens, Cathy A.; Stevenson, David A.; Tan, Tiong Yang; Tan, Wen-Hann; Tsai, Anne C.; Weaver, David D.; Williams, Marc S.; Zackai, Elaine; Zarate, Yuri A.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine