Browsing by Author "Gross, Robert E."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
    (Wiley, 2017-06) Geller, Eric B.; Skarpass, Tara L.; Gross, Robert E.; Goodman, Robert R.; Barkley, Gregory L.; Bazil, Carl W.; Berg, Michael J.; Bergey, Gregory K.; Cash, Sydney S.; Cole, Andrew J.; Duckrow, Robert B.; Edwards, Jonathan C.; Eisenschenk, Stephan; Fessler, James; Fountain, Nathan B.; Goldman, Alicia M.; Gwinn, Ryder P.; Heck, Christianne; Herekar, Aamar; Hirsch, Lawrence J.; Jobst, Barbara C.; King-Stephens, David; Labar, Douglas R.; Leiphart, James W.; Marsh, W. Richard; Meador, Kimford J.; Mizrahi, Eli M.; Murro, Anthony M.; Nair, Dileep R.; Noe, Katherine H.; Park, Yong D.; Rutecki, Paul A.; Salanova, Vicenta; Sheth, Raj D.; Shields, Donald C.; Skidmore, Christopher; Smith, Michael C.; Spencer, David C.; Srinivasan, Shraddha; Tatum, William; Van Ness, Paul C.; Vossler, David G.; Wharen, Robert E., Jr.; Worrell, Gregory A.; Yoshor, Daniel; Zimmerman, Richard S.; Cicora, Kathy; Sun, Felice T.; Morrell, Martha J.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Objective Evaluate the seizure-reduction response and safety of mesial temporal lobe (MTL) brain-responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial-onset seizures of mesial temporal lobe origin. Methods Subjects with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2–6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. Results There were 111 subjects with MTLE; 72% of subjects had bilateral MTL onsets and 28% had unilateral onsets. Subjects had one to four leads placed; only two leads could be connected to the device. Seventy-six subjects had depth leads only, 29 had both depth and strip leads, and 6 had only strip leads. The mean follow-up was 6.1 ± (standard deviation) 2.2 years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% (last observation carried forward). Twenty-nine percent of subjects experienced at least one seizure-free period of 6 months or longer, and 15% experienced at least one seizure-free period of 1 year or longer. There was no difference in seizure reduction in subjects with and without mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), bilateral MTL onsets, prior resection, prior intracranial monitoring, and prior vagus nerve stimulation. In addition, seizure reduction was not dependent on the location of depth leads relative to the hippocampus. The most frequent serious device-related adverse event was soft tissue implant-site infection (overall rate, including events categorized as device-related, uncertain, or not device-related: 0.03 per implant year, which is not greater than with other neurostimulation devices). Significance Brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior MTL resection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable seizures arising from eloquent and other neocortical areas
    (Wiley, 2017-06) Jobst, Barbara C.; Kapur, Ritu; Barkley, Gregory L.; Bazil, Carl W.; Berg, Michel J.; Bergey, Gregory K.; Boggs, Jane G.; Cash, Sydney S.; Cole, Andrew J.; Duchowny, Michael S.; Duckrow, Robert B.; Edwards, Jonathan C.; Eisenschenk, Stephan; Fessler, A. James; Fountain, Nathan B.; Geller, Eric B.; Goldman, Alica M.; Goodman, Robert R.; Gross, Robert E.; Gwinn, Ryder P.; Heck, Christianne; Herekar, Aamr A.; Hirsch, Lawrence J.; King-Stephens, David; Labar, Douglas R.; Marsh, W. R.; Meador, Kimford J.; Miller, Ian; Mizrahi, Eli M.; Murro, Anthony M.; Nair, Dileep R.; Noe, Katherine H.; Olejniczak, Piotr W.; Park, Yong D.; Rutecki, Paul; Salanova, Vicenta; Sheth, Raj D.; Skidmore, Christopher; Smith, Michael C.; Spencer, David C.; Srinivasan, Shraddha; Tatum, William; Van Ness, Paul; Vossler, David G.; Wharen, Robert E., Jr.; Worrell, Gregory A.; Yoshor, Daniel; Zimmerman, Richard S.; Skarpass, Tara L.; Morrell, Martha J.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Objective Evaluate the seizure-reduction response and safety of brain-responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial-onset seizures of neocortical origin. Methods Patients with partial seizures of neocortical origin were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2–6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. Additional analyses considered safety and seizure reduction according to lobe and functional area (e.g., eloquent cortex) of seizure onset. Results There were 126 patients with seizures of neocortical onset. The average follow-up was 6.1 implant years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% in patients with frontal and parietal seizure onsets, 58% in those with temporal neocortical onsets, and 51% in those with multilobar onsets (last observation carried forward [LOCF] analysis). Twenty-six percent of patients experienced at least one seizure-free period of 6 months or longer and 14% experienced at least one seizure-free period of 1 year or longer. Patients with lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 77% reduction, LOCF) and those with normal MRI findings (45% reduction, LOCF) benefitted, although the treatment response was more robust in patients with an MRI lesion (p = 0.02, generalized estimating equation [GEE]). There were no differences in the seizure reduction in patients with and without prior epilepsy surgery or vagus nerve stimulation. Stimulation parameters used for treatment did not cause acute or chronic neurologic deficits, even in eloquent cortical areas. The rates of infection (0.017 per patient implant year) and perioperative hemorrhage (0.8%) were not greater than with other neurostimulation devices. Significance Brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including adults with seizures of neocortical onset, and those with onsets from eloquent cortex.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome: The International Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Public Database and Registry
    (American Medical Association, 2018-03-01) Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel; Jimenez-Shahed, Joohi; Leckman, James Frederick; Porta, Mauro; Servello, Domenico; Meng, Fan-Gang; Kuhn, Jens; Huys, Daniel; Baldermann, Juan Carlos; Foltynie, Thomas; Hariz, Marwan I.; Joyce, Eileen M.; Zrinzo, Ludvic; Kefalopoulou, Zinovia; Silburn, Peter; Coyne, Terry; Mogilner, Alon Y.; Pourfar, Michael H.; Khandhar, Suketu M.; Auyeung, Man; Ostrem, Jill Louise; Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle; Welter, Marie-Laure; Mallet, Luc; Karachi, Carine; Houeto, Jean Luc; Klassen, Bryan Timothy; Ackermans, Linda; Kaido, Takanobu; Temel, Yasin; Gross, Robert E.; Walker, Harrison C.; Lozano, Andres M.; Walter, Benjamin L.; Mari, Zoltan; Anderson, William S.; Changizi, Barbara Kelly; Moro, Elena; Zauber, Sarah Elizabeth; Schrock, Lauren E.; Zhang, Jian-Guo; Hu, Wei; Rizer, Kyle; Monari, Erin H.; Foote, Kelly D.; Malaty, Irene A.; Deeb, Wissam; Gunduz, Aysegul; Okun, Michael S.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Importance: Collective evidence has strongly suggested that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for Tourette syndrome. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of DBS in a multinational cohort of patients with Tourette syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: The prospective International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry included 185 patients with medically refractory Tourette syndrome who underwent DBS implantation from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, at 31 institutions in 10 countries worldwide. Exposures: Patients with medically refractory symptoms received DBS implantation in the centromedian thalamic region (93 of 163 [57.1%]), the anterior globus pallidus internus (41 of 163 [25.2%]), the posterior globus pallidus internus (25 of 163 [15.3%]), and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (4 of 163 [2.5%]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and adverse events. Results: The International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry enrolled 185 patients (of 171 with available data, 37 females and 134 males; mean [SD] age at surgery, 29.1 [10.8] years [range, 13-58 years]). Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder were present in 97 of 151 patients (64.2%) and 32 of 148 (21.6%) had a history of self-injurious behavior. The mean (SD) total Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score improved from 75.01 (18.36) at baseline to 41.19 (20.00) at 1 year after DBS implantation (P < .001). The mean (SD) motor tic subscore improved from 21.00 (3.72) at baseline to 12.91 (5.78) after 1 year (P < .001), and the mean (SD) phonic tic subscore improved from 16.82 (6.56) at baseline to 9.63 (6.99) at 1 year (P < .001). The overall adverse event rate was 35.4% (56 of 158 patients), with intracranial hemorrhage occurring in 2 patients (1.3%), infection in 4 patients with 5 events (3.2%), and lead explantation in 1 patient (0.6%). The most common stimulation-induced adverse effects were dysarthria (10 [6.3%]) and paresthesia (13 [8.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Deep brain stimulation was associated with symptomatic improvement in patients with Tourette syndrome but also with important adverse events. A publicly available website on outcomes of DBS in patients with Tourette syndrome has been provided.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Lateralization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with chronic ambulatory electrocorticography
    (Wiley Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing), 2015-06) King-Stephens, David; Mirro, Emily; Weber, Peter B.; Laxer, Kenneth D.; Van Ness, Paul C.; Salanova, Vicenta; Spencer, David C.; Heck, Christianne N.; Goldman, Alica; Jobst, Barbara; Shields, Donald C.; Bergey, Gregory K.; Eisenschenk, Stephan; Worrell, Gregory A.; Rossi, Marvin A.; Gross, Robert E.; Cole, Andrew J.; Sperling, Michael R.; Nair, Dileep R.; Gwinn, Ryder P.; Park, Yong D.; Rutecki, Paul A.; Fountain, Nathan B.; Wharen, Robert E.; Hirsch, Lawrence J.; Miller, Ian O.; Barkley, Gregory L.; Edwards, Jonathan C.; Geller, Eric B.; Berg, Michel J.; Sadler, Toni L.; Sun, Felice T.; Morrell, Martha J.; Department of Neurology, IU School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with suspected mesial temporal lobe (MTL) epilepsy typically undergo inpatient video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring with scalp and/or intracranial electrodes for 1 to 2 weeks to localize and lateralize the seizure focus or foci. Chronic ambulatory electrocorticography (ECoG) in patients with MTL epilepsy may provide additional information about seizure lateralization. This analysis describes data obtained from chronic ambulatory ECoG in patients with suspected bilateral MTL epilepsy in order to assess the time required to determine the seizure lateralization and whether this information could influence treatment decisions. METHODS: Ambulatory ECoG was reviewed in patients with suspected bilateral MTL epilepsy who were among a larger cohort with intractable epilepsy participating in a randomized controlled trial of responsive neurostimulation. Subjects were implanted with bilateral MTL leads and a cranially implanted neurostimulator programmed to detect abnormal interictal and ictal ECoG activity. ECoG data stored by the neurostimulator were reviewed to determine the lateralization of electrographic seizures and the interval of time until independent bilateral MTL electrographic seizures were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-two subjects were implanted with bilateral MTL leads and followed for 4.7 years on average (median 4.9 years). Independent bilateral MTL electrographic seizures were recorded in 84%. The average time to record bilateral electrographic seizures in the ambulatory setting was 41.6 days (median 13 days, range 0-376 days). Sixteen percent had only unilateral electrographic seizures after an average of 4.6 years of recording. SIGNIFICANCE: About one third of the subjects implanted with bilateral MTL electrodes required >1 month of chronic ambulatory ECoG before the first contralateral MTL electrographic seizure was recorded. Some patients with suspected bilateral MTL seizures had only unilateral electrographic seizures. Chronic ambulatory ECoG in patients with suspected bilateral MTL seizures provides data in a naturalistic setting, may complement data from inpatient video-EEG monitoring, and can contribute to treatment decisions.