Browsing by Author "Good, Jacob"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Hematoma Following Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthetic: Safety of Perioperative Subcutaneous Heparin
    (2023-07-28) Good, Jacob; Bernie, Helen
    BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthetic (IPP) surgery are at an increased risk for cardiovascular complications such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) following surgery due to pre-existing comorbidities associated with erectile dysfunction. The use of perioperative subcutaneous heparin (SqH) along with a surgical drain has been shown to be effective in preventing VTE in IPP patients, without increasing hematoma formation. Not all prosthetic surgeons utilize surgical drains postoperatively. In this study we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of perioperative SqH in preventing VTE in IPP patients without the use of a surgical drain. METHODS: This was a retrospective review from January 2021-July 2023 of patients who underwent IPP placement or explant and replacement at a single institution. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Caprini risk factor scores, VTE risk factors, and 90-day post-operative complications, including hematoma formation, were reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed comparing these variables in men who received SqH and those who did not. RESULTS: We reviewed data for 240 patients; 53% (n=127) received perioperative SqH. The incidence of VTE was 0.9% (1/113) in the non-SqH group, and no VTE was recorded in the group receiving SqH. There was no statistical significance in hematoma formation between groups (SqH 5.5% vs. non-SqH 6.2% p=.898). Beyond hypertension prevalence (SqH 74.8% vs. non-SqH 62.8% p=.045), there was no difference between comorbidities or Caprini risk factor scores (SqH 6.79 vs. non-SqH 6.82 p=.474) between groups (Table 1). 94% of the patients in this study were considered high risk for VTE. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative SqH use without placement of a surgical drain was found to be safe and effective in preventing VTE in patients undergoing IPP surgery. There was no increased risk of hematoma formation or post-operative complications between the groups. Perioperative SqH should be considered in all patients undergoing IPP surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie’s disease: a review of surgical considerations, approaches, and maneuvers
    (AME, 2024) Good, Jacob; Crist, Nikos; Henderson, Brittney; Karcher, Christian; Sencaj, John; Bernie, Helen L.; Urology, School of Medicine
    Peyronie's disease (PD) is a fibrotic disorder of the tunica albuginea that results in penile deformity and/or curvature. Patients usually present complaining of penile pain, shortening and deformity resulting in dissatisfaction with intercourse. Many patients with PD will present with concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED). This disease is a significant concern for patients as it impacts both sexual function and overall quality of life. While there are several interventions available for PD treatment, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is considered the gold standard approach for those with moderate to severe concomitant ED, refractory to medical therapy. The goal of treatment is to give a man a functionally straight erection. Placement of an IPP alone may achieve this. However, when curvature still exists, several adjunct procedures may be performed to include manual modeling, plication, plaque incision or excision and grafting. Additionally, advanced lengthening procedures may also be used. In this paper we will present a comprehensive review of the adjuvant straightening techniques that can be used during IPP placement in men with PD and refractory ED when curvature still exists. Patient selection is a key predictor of implant success, as is preoperative and postoperative management to optimize overall patient care and satisfaction. These topics along with the different surgical approaches to IPP insertion for PD will also be discussed, including the benefits and shortcomings of each. A flowchart to aid surgeons in their intraoperative decision making based on curvature characteristics and specific patient concerns is presented.