Browsing by Author "Goldberg, David"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Exception points and body size contribute to gender disparity in liver transplantation
    (2017-08) Nephew, Lauren D.; Goldberg, David; Lewis, James D.; Abt, Peter; Bryan, Mathew; Forde, Kimberly A.
    Background & Aims—Women are significantly less likely than men to receive a liver transplant and more likely to die on the waitlist. We investigated potential reasons for these disparities, including match run positions and declined organs due to small stature of female recipients. Methods—We analyzed data from the United Network of Organ Sharing registry of candidates placed on the waitlist from May 10, 2007 through June 17, 2013. Primary outcomes included: ranked in first position on a match run, having an organ declined while in first position, declining an organ while in first position because of size mismatch between donor and recipient (body surface area discordance), and death or becoming too sick for liver transplantation. Results—Among 64,995 patients on the waitlist for liver transplantation, 23.1% of men and 15.6% of women received exception points (P<.001). Women listed without exception points were less likely than men to be ranked first (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88–0.99). Women who achieved a first position were more likely to decline an organ than men (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06–1.26); this difference was reduced after we accounted for recipient body surface area (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.98–1.19). Women with a single liver decline were more likely than men with a single liver decline to die or become too sick for transplantation (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12–1.41). The difference was reduced after we accounted for exception points (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12–1.21) and recipient body surface area (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96–1.06). Conclusion—In an analysis of data from the United Network of Organ Sharing registry, we found that women when compared to men on the waitlist for liver transplantation. are disadvantaged by an imbalance in exception point allocation and organ decline because of small stature.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Height Versus Body Surface Area to Normalize Cardiovascular Measurements in Children Using the Pediatric Heart Network Echocardiographic Z-Score Database
    (Springer, 2021) Mahgerefteh, Joseph; Lai, Wyman; Colan, Steven; Trachtenberg, Felicia; Gongwer, Russel; Stylianou, Mario; Bhat, Aarti H.; Goldberg, David; McCrindle, Brian; Frommelt, Peter; Sachdeva, Ritu; Shuplock, Jacqueline Marie; Spurney, Christopher; Troung, Dongngan; Cnota, James F.; Camarda, Joseph A.; Levine, Jami; Pignatelli, Ricardo; Altmann, Karen; van der Velde, Mary; Thankavel, Poonam Punjwani; Chowdhury, Shahryar; Srivastava, Shubhika; Johnson, Tiffanie R.; Lopez, Leo; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Normalizing cardiovascular measurements for body size allows for comparison among children of different ages and for distinguishing pathologic changes from normal physiologic growth. Because of growing interest to use height for normalization, the aim of this study was to develop height-based normalization models and compare them to body surface area (BSA)-based normalization for aortic and left ventricular (LV) measurements. The study population consisted of healthy, non-obese children between 2 and 18 years of age enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Echo Z-Score Project. The echocardiographic study parameters included proximal aortic diameters at 3 locations, LV end-diastolic volume, and LV mass. Using the statistical methodology described in the original project, Z-scores based on height and BSA were determined for the study parameters and tested for any clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). Normalization models based on height versus BSA were compared among underweight, normal weight, and overweight (but not obese) children in the study population. Z-scores based on height and BSA were calculated for the 5 study parameters and revealed no clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Normalization based on height resulted in lower Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group, whereas normalization based on BSA resulted in higher Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group. In other words, increasing BMI had an opposite effect on height-based Z-scores compared to BSA-based Z-scores. Allometric normalization based on height and BSA for aortic and LV sizes is feasible. However, height-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in heavier children, and BSA-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in lighter children. Further studies are needed to assess the performance of these approaches in obese children with or without cardiac disease.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of obeticholic acid for primary sclerosing cholangitis
    (Elsevier, 2020-07) Kowdley, Kris V.; Vuppalanchi, Raj; Levy, Cynthia; Floreani, Annarosa; Andreone, Pietro; LaRusso, Nicholas F.; Shrestha, Roshan; Trotter, James; Goldberg, David; Rushbrook, Simon; Hirschfield, Gideon M.; Schiano, Thomas; Jin, Yuying; Pencek, Richard; MacCone, Leigh; Shapiro, David; Bowlus, Christopher L.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & aims: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare, cholestatic liver disease with no currently approved therapies. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a potent farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist approved for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of OCA in patients with PSC. Methods: AESOP was a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study. Eligible patients were 18 to 75 years of age with a diagnosis of PSC and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2× the upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin <2.5× ULN. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, OCA 1.5-3.0 mg, or OCA 5-10 mg once daily for a 24-week, double-blind phase followed by a 2-year, long-term safety extension (LTSE). Primary endpoints were change in ALP from baseline to week 24, and safety. Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 76 patients randomized to placebo (n = 25), OCA 1.5-3.0 mg (n = 25), and OCA 5-10 mg (n = 26). At week 24, serum ALP was significantly reduced with OCA 5-10 mg vs. placebo (least-square [LS] mean difference = -83.4 [SE = 40.3] U/L; 95% CI -164.28 to -2.57; p = 0.043). Serum ALP was not significantly reduced with OCA 1.5-3.0 mg vs. placebo at week 24 (LS mean [SE] difference = -78.29 [41.81] U/L; 95% CI -162.08 to 5.50; p = 0.067). Total bilirubin remained comparable to baseline in all groups. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was dose-related pruritus (placebo 46%; OCA 1.5-3.0 mg 60%; OCA 5-10 mg 67%). Reductions in ALP were maintained during the LTSE, and no new safety signals emerged. Conclusions: Treatment with OCA 5-10 mg reduced serum ALP in patients with PSC. Mild to moderate dose-related pruritus was the most common adverse event.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Effect of Udenafil on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Adolescents With the Fontan Circulation
    (Elsevier, 2024) Edelson, Jonathan B.; Zak, Victor; Goldberg, David; Fleming, Greg; Mackie, Andrew S.; Patel, Jyoti K.; Files, Matthew; Downing, Tacy; Richmond, Marc; Acheampong, Ben; Cartoski, Mark; Detterich, Jon; McCrindle, Brian; McHugh, Kimberly; Hansen, Jesse E.; Wagner, Jonathan; Di Maria, Michael; Weingarten, Angela; Nowlen, Todd; Yoon, Ja Kyoung; Kim, Gi Beom; Williams, Richard; Whitehill, Robert; Kirkpatrick, Edward; Yin, Suellen; Ermis, Peter; Lubert, Adam M.; Stylianou, Mario; Freemon, D'Andrea; Hu, Chenwei; Garuba, Olukayode D.; Frommelt, Peter; Goldstein, Bryan H.; Paridon, Stephen; Garg, Ruchira; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) trial showed that treatment with udenafil was associated with improved exercise performance at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold in children with Fontan physiology. However, it is not known how the initiation of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy affects heart rate and blood pressure in this population. These data may help inform patient selection and monitoring after the initiation of udenafil therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of udenafil on vital signs in the cohort of patients enrolled in the FUEL trial. This international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of udenafil included adolescents with single ventricle congenital heart disease who had undergone Fontan palliation. Changes in vital signs (heart rate [HR], systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) were compared both to subject baseline and between the treatment and the placebo groups. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to evaluate changes in vital signs for prespecified subpopulations believed to be most sensitive to udenafil initiation. Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment and placebo cohorts (n = 200 for each). The groups demonstrated a decrease in HR, SBP, and DBP 2 hours after drug/placebo administration, except SBP in the placebo group. There was an increase in SBP from baseline to after 6-min walk test in the treatment and placebo groups, and the treatment group showed an increase in HR (87.4 ± 15.0 to 93.1 ± 19.4 beats/min, p <0.01) after exercise. When comparing changes from baseline to the 26-week study visit, small decreases in both SBP (-1.9 ± 12.3 mm Hg, p = 0.03) and DBP (-3.0 ± 9.6 mm Hg, p <0.01) were seen in the treatment group. There were no clinically significant differences between treatment and placebo group in change in HR or blood pressure in the youngest age quartile, lightest weight quartile, or those on afterload-reducing agents. In conclusion, initiation of treatment with udenafil in patients with Fontan circulation was not associated with clinically significant changes in vital signs, implying that for patients similar to those enrolled in the FUEL trial, udenafil can be started without the requirement for additional monitoring after initial administration.