Browsing by Author "Gnant, Michael"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adjuvant Palbociclib for Early Breast Cancer: The PALLAS Trial Results (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/BIG-14-03)
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022) Gnant, Michael; Dueck, Amylou C.; Frantal, Sophie; Martin, Miguel; Burstein, Hal J.; Greil, Richard; Fox, Peter; Wolff, Antonio C.; Chan, Arlene; Winer, Eric P.; Pfeiler, Georg; Miller, Kathy D.; Colleoni, Marco; Suga, Jennifer M.; Rubovsky, Gabor; Bliss, Judith M.; Mayer, Ingrid A.; Singer, Christian F.; Nowecki, Zbigniew; Hahn, Olwen; Thomson, Jacqui; Wolmark, Norman; Amillano, Kepa; Rugo, Hope S.; Steger, Guenther G.; Hernando Fernández de Aránguiz, Blanca; Haddad, Tufia C.; Perelló, Antonia; Bellet, Meritxell; Fohler, Hannes; Metzger Filho, Otto; Jallitsch-Halper, Anita; Solomon, Kadine; Schurmans, Céline; Theall, Kathy P.; Lu, Dongrui R.; Tenner, Kathleen; Fesl, Christian; DeMichele, Angela; Mayer, Erica L.; PALLAS groups and investigators; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for advanced breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, the potential value of adding palbociclib to endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has not been confirmed. Patients and methods: In the prospective, randomized, phase III PALLAS trial, patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive 2 years of palbociclib (125 mg orally once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) with adjuvant endocrine therapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy alone (for at least 5 years). The primary end point of the study was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary end points were invasive breast cancer-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, locoregional cancer-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Among 5,796 patients enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide over 3 years, 5,761 were included in the intention-to-treat population. At the final protocol-defined analysis, at a median follow-up of 31 months, iDFS events occurred in 253 of 2,884 (8.8%) patients who received palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and in 263 of 2,877 (9.1%) patients who received endocrine therapy alone, with similar results between the two treatment groups (iDFS at 4 years: 84.2% v 84.5%; hazard ratio, 0.96; CI, 0.81 to 1.14; P = .65). No significant differences were observed for secondary time-to-event end points, and subgroup analyses did not show any differences by subgroup. There were no new safety signals for palbociclib in this trial. Conclusion: At this final analysis of the PALLAS trial, the addition of adjuvant palbociclib to standard endocrine therapy did not improve outcomes over endocrine therapy alone in patients with early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss (AIBL) in postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive breast cancer: Joint position statement of the IOF, CABS, ECTS, IEG, ESCEO IMS, and SIOG
    (Elsevier, 2017-06) Hadji, Peyman; Aapro, Matti S.; Body, Jean-Jacques; Gnant, Michael; Brandi, Maria Luisa; Reginster, Jean Yves; Zillikens, M. Carola; Glüer, Claus-C.; de Villiers, Tobie; Baber, Rod; Roodman, G. David; Cooper, Cyrus; Langdahl, Bente; Palacios, Santiago; Kanis, John; Al-Daghri, Nasser; Nogues, Xavier; Eriksen, Erik Fink; Kurth, Andreas; Rizzoli, Rene; Coleman, Robert E.; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, IU School of Medicine
    Background Several guidelines have been reported for bone-directed treatment in women with early breast cancer (EBC) for averting fractures, particularly during aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Recently, a number of studies on additional fracture related risk factors, new treatment options as well as real world studies demonstrating a much higher fracture rate than suggested by randomized clinical controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, this updated algorithm was developed to better assess fracture risk and direct treatment as a position statement of several interdisciplinary cancer and bone societies involved in the management of AI-associated bone loss (AIBL). Patients and methods A systematic literature review identified recent advances in the management of AIBL. Results with individual agents were assessed based on trial design, size, follow-up, and safety. Results Several fracture related risk factors in patients with EBC were identified. Although, the FRAX algorithm includes fracture risk factors (RF) in addition to BMD, it does not seem to adequately address the effects of AIBL. Several antiresorptive agents can prevent and treat AIBL. However, concerns regarding compliance and long-term safety remain. Overall, the evidence for fracture prevention is strongest for denosumab 60 mg s.c. every 6 months. Additionally, recent studies as well as an individual patient data meta-analysis of all available randomized trial data support additional anticancer benefits from adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women with a 34% relative risk reduction in bone metastasis and 17% relative risk decrease in breast cancer mortality that needs to be taken into account when advising on management of AIBL. Conclusions In all patients initiating AI treatment, fracture risk should be assessed and recommendation with regard to exercise and calcium/vitamin D supplementation given. Bone-directed therapy should be given to all patients with a T-score<−2.0 or with a T-score of <–1.5 SD with one additional RF, or with ≥2 risk factors (without BMD) for the duration of AI treatment. Patients with T-score>−1.5 SD and no risk factors should be managed based on BMD loss during the first year and the local guidelines for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Compliance should be regularly assessed as well as BMD on treatment after 12 - 24 months. Furthermore, because of the decreased incidence of bone recurrence and breast cancer specific mortality, adjuvant bisphosphonates are recommended for all postmenopausal women at significant risk of disease recurrence.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Treatment Exposure and Discontinuation in the PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study of Palbociclib With Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer (PALLAS/AFT-05/ABCSG-42/BIG-14-03)
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022) Mayer, Erica L.; Fesl, Christian; Hlauschek, Dominik; Garcia-Estevez, Laura; Burstein, Harold J.; Zdenkowski, Nicholas; Wette, Viktor; Miller, Kathy D.; Balic, Marija; Mayer, Ingrid A.; Cameron, David; Winer, Eric P.; Ponce Lorenzo, José Juan; Lake, Diana; Pristauz-Telsnigg, Gunda; Haddad, Tufia C.; Shepherd, Lois; Iwata, Hiroji; Goetz, Matthew; Cardoso, Fatima; Traina, Tiffany A.; Sabanathan, Dhanusha; Breitenstein, Urs; Ackerl, Kerstin; Metzger Filho, Otto; Zehetner, Karin; Solomon, Kadine; El-Abed, Sarra; Puyana Theall, Kathy; Lu, Dongrui Ray; Dueck, Amylou; Gnant, Michael; DeMichele, Angela; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: The PALLAS study investigated whether the addition of palbociclib, an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in early hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. In this analysis, we evaluated palbociclib exposure and discontinuation in PALLAS. Methods: Patients with stage II-III HR+, HER2- disease were randomly assigned to 2 years of palbociclib with adjuvant ET versus ET alone. The primary objective was to compare iDFS between arms. Continuous monitoring of toxicity, dose modifications, and early discontinuation was performed. Association of baseline covariates with time to palbociclib reduction and discontinuation was analyzed with multivariable competing risk models. Landmark and inverse probability weighted per-protocol analyses were performed to assess the impact of drug persistence and exposure on iDFS. Results: Of the 5,743 patient analysis population (2,840 initiating palbociclib), 1,199 (42.2%) stopped palbociclib before 2 years, the majority (772, 27.2%) for adverse effects, most commonly neutropenia and fatigue. Discontinuation of ET did not differ between arms. Discontinuations for non-protocol-defined reasons were greater in the first 3 months of palbociclib, and in the first calendar year of accrual, and declined over time. No significant relationship was seen between longer palbociclib duration or ≥ 70% exposure intensity and improved iDFS. In the weighted per-protocol analysis, no improvement in iDFS was observed in patients receiving palbociclib versus not (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.11). Conclusion: Despite observed rates of discontinuation in PALLAS, analyses suggest that the lack of significant iDFS difference between arms was not directly related to inadequate palbociclib exposure. However, the discontinuation rate illustrates the challenge of introducing novel adjuvant treatments, and the need for interventions to improve persistence with oral cancer therapies.