Browsing by Author "Givi, Babak"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Advanced head and neck surgery training during the COVID-19 pandemic
    (Wiley, 2020) Givi, Babak; Moore, Michael G.; Bewley, Arnaud F.; Coffey, Charles S.; Cohen, Marc A.; Hessel, Amy C.; Jalisi, Scharukh; Kang, Steven; Newman, Jason G.; Puscas, Liana; Shindo, Maisie; Shuman, Andrew; Thakkar, Punam; Weed, Donald T.; Chalian, Ara; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted medical training. Here we assess its effect on head and neck surgical education. Methods Surveys were sent to current accredited program directors and trainees to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the fellow's experience and employment search. Current fellows' operative logs were compared with those of the 2018 to 2019 graduates. Results Despite reduction in operative volume, 82% of current American Head and Neck Society fellows have reached the number of major surgical operations to support certification. When surveyed, 86% of program directors deemed their fellow ready to enter practice. The majority of fellows felt prepared to practice ablative (96%), and microvascular surgery (73%), and 57% have secured employment to follow graduation. Five (10%) had a pending job position put on hold due to the pandemic. Conclusions Despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, current accredited trainees remain well-positioned to obtain proficiency and enter the work-force.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Advanced head and neck surgery training during the COVID-19 pandemic
    (Wiley, 2020) Givi, Babak; Moore, Michael G.; Bewley, Arnaud F.; Coffey, Charles S.; Cohen, Marc A.; Hessel, Amy C.; Jalisi, Scharukh; Kang, Steven; Newman, Jason G.; Puscas, Liana; Shindo, Maisie; Shuman, Andrew; Thakkar, Punam; Weed, Donald T.; Chalian, Ara; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted medical training. Here we assess its effect on head and neck surgical education. Methods Surveys were sent to current accredited program directors and trainees to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the fellow's experience and employment search. Current fellows' operative logs were compared with those of the 2018 to 2019 graduates. Results Despite reduction in operative volume, 82% of current American Head and Neck Society fellows have reached the number of major surgical operations to support certification. When surveyed, 86% of program directors deemed their fellow ready to enter practice. The majority of fellows felt prepared to practice ablative (96%), and microvascular surgery (73%), and 57% have secured employment to follow graduation. Five (10%) had a pending job position put on hold due to the pandemic. Conclusions Despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, current accredited trainees remain well-positioned to obtain proficiency and enter the work-force.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Distribution of the head and neck surgical oncology workforce in the United States
    (Wiley, 2022-11) Talwar, Abhinav; Gordon, Alex J.; Bewley, Arnaud F.; Fancy, Tanya; Lydiatt, William M.; Weed, Donald; Moore, Michael G.; Givi, Babak; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background The recent trends in education and geographic distribution of the head and neck surgery workforce have not been studied extensively. Methods We reviewed publicly available sources to locate all fellowship-trained head and neck surgeons and recent graduates. The number of surgeons in each state was compared against head and neck cancer incidence data from the Centers for Disease Control. Results The number of graduates increased annually by 1 per 100 000 000 people from 2011–2020. The average number of fellowship-trained surgeons per state was 10 (SD: 12). The average number of new head and neck cancer cases per surgeon was 247 (SD: 135). Ten states (20%) had cases >1 SD above the national average/surgeon, while 3 (6%) had cases >1 SD below the national average. Conclusion Head and neck surgeons are located in most states, but not uniformly. Most states have approximately average density of surgeons; however, several states are outliers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Safety Recommendations for Evaluation and Surgery of the Head and Neck During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    (AMA, 2020-03) Givi, Babak; Schiff, Bradley A.; Chinn, Steven B.; Clayburgh, Daniel; Iyer, N. Gopalakrishna; Jalisi, Scharukh; Moore, Michael G.; Nathan, Cherie-Ann; Orloff, Lisa A.; O'Neill, James P.; Parker, Noah; Zender, Chad; Morris, Luc G. T.; Davies, Louise; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Importance The rapidly expanding novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has challenged the medical community to an unprecedented degree. Physicians and health care workers are at added risk of exposure and infection during the course of patient care. Because of the rapid spread of this disease through respiratory droplets, health care workers who come in close contact with the upper aerodigestive tract during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as otolaryngologists–head and neck surgeons, are particularly at risk. A set of safety recommendations was created based on a review of the literature and communications with physicians with firsthand knowledge of safety procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Observations A high number of health care workers were infected during the first phase of the pandemic in the city of Wuhan, China. Subsequently, by adopting strict safety precautions, other regions were able to achieve high levels of safety for health care workers without jeopardizing the care of patients. The most common procedures related to the examination and treatment of upper aerodigestive tract diseases were reviewed. Each category was reviewed based on the potential risk imposed to health care workers. Specific recommendations were made based on the literature, when available, or consensus best practices. Specific safety recommendations were made for performing tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance Preserving a highly skilled health care workforce is a top priority for any community and health care system. Based on the experience of health care systems in Asia and Europe, by following strict safety guidelines, the risk of exposure and infection of health care workers could be greatly reduced while providing high levels of care. The provided recommendations, which may evolve over time, could be used as broad guidance for all health care workers who are involved in the care of patients with COVID-19.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Virtual Tumor Boards for Remote Learning in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
    (American Medical Association, 2023) Papazian, Michael R.; Chow, Michael; Weed, Donald; Liu, Jeffrey C.; Bewley, Arnaud F.; Moore, Michael G.; Givi, Babak; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Importance: In addition to their patient management value, multidisciplinary tumor boards have been recognized as effective learning tools. However, the value of using a virtual tumor board as a learning tool for head and neck surgical oncology fellows has not been studied. Objective: To describe the structure and content of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Virtual Tumor Board and assess its educational value as perceived by attendees. Design, setting, and participants: All sessions of the AHNS Virtual Tumor Board from April 8, 2020, to June 1, 2022, were reviewed. Topics, presenters, participants, and viewership data were collected as of October 15, 2022, from session recordings posted to an online video sharing and social media platform. Additionally, an anonymous, 14-question online survey was designed to elicit feedback from head and neck surgery trainees on virtual tumor board engagement, strengths, and weaknesses. The survey was electronically distributed in June and July 2022 to the 101 fellows enrolled in AHNS-accredited programs between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. Main outcomes and measures: The primary aim was to tabulate online viewership of the sessions. The secondary aim was to qualitatively assess the experience of head and neck trainees with the AHNS Virtual Tumor Board using a survey. Results: Forty-two sessions of the virtual tumor board were held between April 8, 2020, and June 1, 2022. Almost all sessions (41 [98%]) were case based. One hundred and sixteen cases were presented, representing 2 to 3 cases per session, by 75 unique faculty members. Each session was viewed a mean of 217 times (range, 64-2216 views). In the 2021 to 2022 academic year, a mean of 60 viewers (range, 30-92 viewers) attended each live session. In all, 29 survey responses were collected from 101 fellows in AHNS-accredited programs (29% response rate). Most respondents felt the format allowed for excellent teaching (18 of 26 respondents [69%]) and discussion (19 of 26 respondents [73%]). Most respondents (22 of 29 respondents [76%]) believed that practicing head and neck surgeons would benefit from the sessions. Conclusions and relevance: This survey study found that the AHNS Virtual Tumor Board was well-attended and well-reviewed by head and neck surgical oncology trainees. The virtual tumor board format could be used as model of remote learning for other organizations.