Browsing by Author "Ginsburg, Geoffrey S."

Now showing 1 - 10 of 11
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A research agenda to support the development and implementation of genomics-based clinical informatics tools and resources
    (Oxford University Press, 2022) Wiley, Ken; Findley, Laura; Goldrich, Madison; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder K.; Stevens, Ana; Williams, Pamela; Bult, Carol J.; Chisholm, Rex; Deverka, Patricia; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Green, Eric D.; Jarvik, Gail; Mensah, George A.; Ramos, Erin; Relling, Mary V.; Roden, Dan M.; Rowley, Robb; Alterovitz, Gil; Aronson, Samuel; Bastarache, Lisa; Cimino, James J.; Crowgey, Erin L.; Del Fiol, Guilherme; Freimuth, Robert R.; Hoffman, Mark A.; Jeff, Janina; Johnson, Kevin; Kawamoto, Kensaku; Madhavan, Subha; Mendonca, Eneida A.; Ohno-Machado, Lucila; Pratap, Siddharth; Overby Taylor, Casey; Ritchie, Marylyn D.; Walton, Nephi; Weng, Chunhua; Zayas-Cabán, Teresa; Manolio, Teri A.; Williams, Marc S.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objective: The Genomic Medicine Working Group of the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research virtually hosted its 13th genomic medicine meeting titled "Developing a Clinical Genomic Informatics Research Agenda". The meeting's goal was to articulate a research strategy to develop Genomics-based Clinical Informatics Tools and Resources (GCIT) to improve the detection, treatment, and reporting of genetic disorders in clinical settings. Materials and methods: Experts from government agencies, the private sector, and academia in genomic medicine and clinical informatics were invited to address the meeting's goals. Invitees were also asked to complete a survey to assess important considerations needed to develop a genomic-based clinical informatics research strategy. Results: Outcomes from the meeting included identifying short-term research needs, such as designing and implementing standards-based interfaces between laboratory information systems and electronic health records, as well as long-term projects, such as identifying and addressing barriers related to the establishment and implementation of genomic data exchange systems that, in turn, the research community could help address. Discussion: Discussions centered on identifying gaps and barriers that impede the use of GCIT in genomic medicine. Emergent themes from the meeting included developing an implementation science framework, defining a value proposition for all stakeholders, fostering engagement with patients and partners to develop applications under patient control, promoting the use of relevant clinical workflows in research, and lowering related barriers to regulatory processes. Another key theme was recognizing pervasive biases in data and information systems, algorithms, access, value, and knowledge repositories and identifying ways to resolve them.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cancer Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacoepidemiology: Setting a Research Agenda to Accelerate Translation
    (Oxford University Press, 2010-10-13) Freedman, Andrew N.; Sansbury, Leah B.; Figg, William D.; Potosky, Arnold L.; Smith, Sheila R. Weiss; Khoury, Muin J.; Nelson, Stefanie A.; Weinshilboum, Richard M.; Ratain, Mark J.; McLeod, Howard L.; Epstein, Robert S.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Schilsky, Richard L.; Liu, Geoffrey; Flockhart, David A.; Ulrich, Cornelia M.; Davis, Robert L.; Lesko, Lawrence J.; Zineh, Issam; Randhawa, Gurvaneet; Ambrosone, Christine B.; Relling, Mary V.; Rothman, Nat; Xie, Heng; Spitz, Margaret R.; Ballard-Barbash, Rachel; Doroshow, James H.; Minasian, Lori M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Recent advances in genomic research have demonstrated a substantial role for genomic factors in predicting response to cancer therapies. Researchers in the fields of cancer pharmacogenomics and pharmacoepidemiology seek to understand why individuals respond differently to drug therapy, in terms of both adverse effects and treatment efficacy. To identify research priorities as well as the resources and infrastructure needed to advance these fields, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop titled “Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Setting a Research Agenda to Accelerate Translation” on July 21, 2009, in Bethesda, MD. In this commentary, we summarize and discuss five science-based recommendations and four infrastructure-based recommendations that were identified as a result of discussions held during this workshop. Key recommendations include 1) supporting the routine collection of germline and tumor biospecimens in NCI-sponsored clinical trials and in some observational and population-based studies; 2) incorporating pharmacogenomic markers into clinical trials; 3) addressing the ethical, legal, social, and biospecimen- and data-sharing implications of pharmacogenomic and pharmacoepidemiologic research; and 4) establishing partnerships across NCI, with other federal agencies, and with industry. Together, these recommendations will facilitate the discovery and validation of clinical, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and genomic markers related to cancer treatment response and adverse events, and they will improve both the speed and efficiency by which new pharmacogenomic and pharmacoepidemiologic information is translated into clinical practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correction: Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network
    (Springer Nature, 2021) Levy, Kenneth D.; Blake, Kathryn; Fletcher-Hoppe, Colette; Franciosi, James; Goto, Daisuke; Hicks, James K.; Holmes, Ann M.; Kanuri, Sri Harsha; Madden, Ebony B.; Musty, Michael D.; Orlando, Lori; Pratt, Victoria M.; Ramos, Michelle; Wu, Ryanne; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Correction to: Genetics in Medicine 21:2019; 10.1038/s41436-018-0080-y; published online 12 July 2018 The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Daisuke Goto, which was incorrectly given as Diasuke Goto. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correction: Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network
    (Springer Nature, 2019-07) Levy, Kenneth D.; Blake, Kathryn; Fletcher-Hoppe, Colette; Franciosi, James; Goto, Diasuke; Hicks, James K.; Holmes, Ann M.; Kanuri, Sri Harsha; Madden, Ebony B.; Musty, Michael D.; Orlando, Lori; Pratt, Victoria M.; Ramos, Michelle; Wu, Ryanne; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, which was incorrectly given as Geoffrey Ginsburg. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development of Competency-based Online Genomic Medicine Training (COGENT)
    (Taylor & Francis, 2023) Haga, Susanne B.; Chung, Wendy K.; Cubano, Luis A.; Curry, Timothy B.; Empey, Philip E.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Mangold, Kara; Miyake, Christina Y.; Prakash, Siddharth K.; Ramsey, Laura B.; Rowley, Robb; Rohrer Vitek, Carolyn R.; Skaar, Todd C.; Wynn, Julia; Manolio, Teri A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The fields of genetics and genomics have greatly expanded across medicine through the development of new technologies that have revealed genetic contributions to a wide array of traits and diseases. Thus, the development of widely available educational resources for all healthcare providers is essential to ensure the timely and appropriate utilization of genetics and genomics patient care. In 2020, the National Human Genome Research Institute released a call for new proposals to develop accessible, sustainable online education for health providers. This paper describes the efforts of the six teams awarded to reach the goal of providing genetic and genomic training modules that are broadly available for busy clinicians.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Establishing the value of genomics in medicine: the IGNITE Pragmatic Trials Network.
    (Springer, 2021-07) Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Cavallari, Larisa H.; Chakraborty, Hrishikesh; Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M.; Dexter, Paul R.; Eadon, Michael T.; Ferket, Bart S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Johnson, Julie A.; Kannry, Joseph; Kucher, Natalie; Madden, Ebony B.; Orlando, Lori A.; Parker, Wanda; Peterson, Josh; Pratt, Victoria M.; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder K.; Ramos, Michelle A.; Skaar, Todd C.; Sperber, Nina; Steen-Burrell, Kady-Ann; Van Driest, Sara L.; Voora, Deepak; Wiisanen, Kristin; Winterstein, Almut G.; Volpi, Simona
    PURPOSE: A critical gap in the adoption of genomic medicine into medical practice is the need for the rigorous evaluation of the utility of genomic medicine interventions. METHODS: The Implementing Genomics in Practice Pragmatic Trials Network (IGNITE PTN) was formed in 2018 to measure the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genomic medicine interventions, to assess approaches for real-world application of genomic medicine in diverse clinical settings, and to produce generalizable knowledge on clinical trials using genomic interventions. Five clinical sites and a coordinating center evaluated trial proposals and developed working groups to enable their implementation. RESULTS: Two pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) have been initiated, one evaluating genetic risk APOL1 variants in African Americans in the management of their hypertension, and the other to evaluate the use of pharmacogenetic testing for medications to manage acute and chronic pain as well as depression. CONCLUSION: IGNITE PTN is a network that carries out PCTs in genomic medicine; it is focused on diversity and inclusion of underrepresented minority trial participants; it uses electronic health records and clinical decision support to deliver the interventions. IGNITE PTN will develop the evidence to support (or oppose) the adoption of genomic medicine interventions by patients, providers, and payers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Implementing a pragmatic clinical trial to tailor opioids for chronic pain on behalf of the IGNITE ADOPT PGx investigators
    (Wiley, 2024) Skaar, Todd C.; Myers, Rachel A.; Fillingim, Roger B.; Callaghan, John T.; Cicali, Emily; Eadon, Michael T.; Elwood, Erica N.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Lynch, Sheryl; Nguyen, Khoa A.; Obeng, Aniwaa Owusu; Park, Haesuk; Pratt, Victoria M.; Rosenman, Marc; Sadeghpour, Azita; Shuman, Saskia; Singh, Rajbir; Tillman, Emma M.; Volpi, Simona; Wiisanen, Kristin; Winterstein, Almut G.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Voora, Deepak; Orlando, Lori; Chakraborty, Hrishikesh; Van Driest, Sara; Peterson, Josh F.; Cavallari, Larisa A.; Johnson, Julie A.; Dexter, Paul R.; IGNITE Pragmatic Trials Network; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Chronic pain is a prevalent condition with enormous economic burden. Opioids such as tramadol, codeine, and hydrocodone are commonly used to treat chronic pain; these drugs are activated to more potent opioid receptor agonists by the hepatic CYP2D6 enzyme. Results from clinical studies and mechanistic understandings suggest that CYP2D6-guided therapy will improve pain control and reduce adverse drug events. However, CYP2D6 is rarely used in clinical practice due in part to the demand for additional clinical trial evidence. Thus, we designed the ADOPT-PGx (A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics) chronic pain study, a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled clinical trial, to assess the effect of CYP2D6 testing on pain management. The study enrolled 1048 participants who are taking or being considered for treatment with CYP2D6-impacted opioids for their chronic pain. Participants were randomized to receive immediate or delayed (by 6 months) genotyping of CYP2D6 with clinical decision support (CDS). CDS encouraged the providers to follow the CYP2D6-guided trial recommendations. The primary study outcome is the 3-month absolute change in the composite pain intensity score assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. Follow-up will be completed in July 2024. Herein, we describe the design of this trial along with challenges encountered during enrollment.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Qualitative study of system-level factors related to genomic implementation
    (Springer Nature, 2019-07) Zebrowski, Alexis M.; Ellis, Darcy E.; Barg, Frances K.; Sperber, Nina R.; Bernhardt, Barbara A.; Denny, Joshua C.; Dexter, Paul R.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Johnson, Julie A.; Levy, Mia A.; Orlando, Lori A.; Pollin, Toni I.; Skaar, Todd C.; Kimmel, Stephen E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: Research on genomic medicine integration has focused on applications at the individual level, with less attention paid to implementation within clinical settings. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify system-level factors that played a role in implementation of genomic medicine within Implementing GeNomics In PracTicE (IGNITE) Network projects. METHODS: Up to four study personnel, including principal investigators and study coordinators from each of six IGNITE projects, were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide that asked interviewees to describe study site(s), progress at each site, and factors facilitating or impeding project implementation. Interviews were coded following CFIR inner-setting constructs. RESULTS: Key barriers included (1) limitations in integrating genomic data and clinical decision support tools into electronic health records, (2) physician reluctance toward genomic research participation and clinical implementation due to a limited evidence base, (3) inadequate reimbursement for genomic medicine, (4) communication among and between investigators and clinicians, and (5) lack of clinical and leadership engagement. CONCLUSION: Implementation of genomic medicine is hindered by several system-level barriers to both research and practice. Addressing these barriers may serve as important facilitators for studying and implementing genomics in practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rationale and design for a pragmatic randomized trial to assess gene-based prescribing for SSRIs in the treatment of depression
    (Wiley, 2024) Hines, Lindsay J.; Wilke, Russell A.; Myers, Rachel; Mathews, Carol A.; Liu, Michelle; Baye, Jordan F.; Petry, Natasha; Cicali, Emily J.; Duong, Benjamin Q.; Elwood, Erica; Hulvershorn, Leslie; Nguyen, Khoa; Ramos, Michelle; Sadeghpour, Azita; Wu, R. Ryanne; Williamson, Lloyda; Wiisanen, Kristin; Voora, Deepak; Singh, Rajbir; Blake, Kathryn V.; Murrough, James W.; Volpi, Simona; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Orlando, Lori; Chakraborty, Hrishikesh; Dexter, Paul; Johnson, Julie A.; Skaar, Todd C.; Cavallari, Larisa H.; Van Driest, Sara L.; Peterson, Josh F.; IGNITE Pragmatic Trials Network; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) metabolism is strongly influenced by two pharmacogenes, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. However, the effectiveness of prospectively using pharmacogenetic variants to select or dose SSRIs for depression is uncertain in routine clinical practice. The objective of this prospective, multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial is to determine the effectiveness of genotype-guided selection and dosing of antidepressants on control of depression in participants who are 8 years or older with ≥3 months of depressive symptoms who require new or revised therapy. Those randomized to the intervention arm undergo pharmacogenetic testing at baseline and receive a pharmacy consult and/or automated clinical decision support intervention based on an actionable phenotype, while those randomized to the control arm have pharmacogenetic testing at the end of 6-months. In both groups, depression and drug tolerability outcomes are assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months (primary), and 6 months. The primary end point is defined by change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression score assessed at 3 months versus baseline. Secondary end points include change inpatient health questionnaire (PHQ-8) measure of depression severity, remission rates defined by PROMIS score < 16, medication adherence, and medication side effects. The primary analysis will compare the PROMIS score difference between trial arms among those with an actionable CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 genetic result or a CYP2D6 drug-drug interaction. The trial has completed accrual of 1461 participants, of which 562 were found to have an actionable phenotype to date, and follow-up will be complete in April of 2024.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects
    (Wiley, 2018-05) Volpi, Simona; Bult, Carol J.; Chisholm, Rex L.; Deverka, Patricia A.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Jacob, Howard J.; Kasapi, Melpomeni; McLeod, Howard L.; Roden, Dan M.; Williams, Marc S.; Green, Eric D.; Rodriguez, Laura Lyman; Aronson, Samuel; Cavallari, Larisa H.; Denny, Joshua C.; Dressler, Lynn G.; Johnson, Julie A.; Klein, Teri E.; Leeder, J. Steven; Piquette-Miller, Micheline; Perera, Minoli; Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura J.; Rehm, Heidi L.; Ritchie, Marylyn D.; Skaar, Todd C.; Wagle, Nikhil; Weinshilboum, Richard; Weitzel, Kristin W.; Wildin, Robert; Wilson, John; Manolio, Teri A.; Relling, Mary V.; Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine
    Response to a drug often differs widely among individual patients. This variability is frequently observed not only with respect to effective responses but also with adverse drug reactions. Matching patients to the drugs that are most likely to be effective and least likely to cause harm is the goal of effective therapeutics. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of precision medicine through elucidating the genetic determinants responsible for pharmacological outcomes and using them to guide drug selection and dosing. Here we survey the US landscape of research programs in PGx implementation, review current advances and clinical applications of PGx, summarize the obstacles that have hindered PGx implementation, and identify the critical knowledge gaps and possible studies needed to help to address them.