- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Ginsburg, Geoffrey S."
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A research agenda to support the development and implementation of genomics-based clinical informatics tools and resources(Oxford University Press, 2022) Wiley, Ken; Findley, Laura; Goldrich, Madison; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder K.; Stevens, Ana; Williams, Pamela; Bult, Carol J.; Chisholm, Rex; Deverka, Patricia; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Green, Eric D.; Jarvik, Gail; Mensah, George A.; Ramos, Erin; Relling, Mary V.; Roden, Dan M.; Rowley, Robb; Alterovitz, Gil; Aronson, Samuel; Bastarache, Lisa; Cimino, James J.; Crowgey, Erin L.; Del Fiol, Guilherme; Freimuth, Robert R.; Hoffman, Mark A.; Jeff, Janina; Johnson, Kevin; Kawamoto, Kensaku; Madhavan, Subha; Mendonca, Eneida A.; Ohno-Machado, Lucila; Pratap, Siddharth; Overby Taylor, Casey; Ritchie, Marylyn D.; Walton, Nephi; Weng, Chunhua; Zayas-Cabán, Teresa; Manolio, Teri A.; Williams, Marc S.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineObjective: The Genomic Medicine Working Group of the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research virtually hosted its 13th genomic medicine meeting titled "Developing a Clinical Genomic Informatics Research Agenda". The meeting's goal was to articulate a research strategy to develop Genomics-based Clinical Informatics Tools and Resources (GCIT) to improve the detection, treatment, and reporting of genetic disorders in clinical settings. Materials and methods: Experts from government agencies, the private sector, and academia in genomic medicine and clinical informatics were invited to address the meeting's goals. Invitees were also asked to complete a survey to assess important considerations needed to develop a genomic-based clinical informatics research strategy. Results: Outcomes from the meeting included identifying short-term research needs, such as designing and implementing standards-based interfaces between laboratory information systems and electronic health records, as well as long-term projects, such as identifying and addressing barriers related to the establishment and implementation of genomic data exchange systems that, in turn, the research community could help address. Discussion: Discussions centered on identifying gaps and barriers that impede the use of GCIT in genomic medicine. Emergent themes from the meeting included developing an implementation science framework, defining a value proposition for all stakeholders, fostering engagement with patients and partners to develop applications under patient control, promoting the use of relevant clinical workflows in research, and lowering related barriers to regulatory processes. Another key theme was recognizing pervasive biases in data and information systems, algorithms, access, value, and knowledge repositories and identifying ways to resolve them.Item Cancer Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacoepidemiology: Setting a Research Agenda to Accelerate Translation(Oxford University Press, 2010-10-13) Freedman, Andrew N.; Sansbury, Leah B.; Figg, William D.; Potosky, Arnold L.; Smith, Sheila R. Weiss; Khoury, Muin J.; Nelson, Stefanie A.; Weinshilboum, Richard M.; Ratain, Mark J.; McLeod, Howard L.; Epstein, Robert S.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Schilsky, Richard L.; Liu, Geoffrey; Flockhart, David A.; Ulrich, Cornelia M.; Davis, Robert L.; Lesko, Lawrence J.; Zineh, Issam; Randhawa, Gurvaneet; Ambrosone, Christine B.; Relling, Mary V.; Rothman, Nat; Xie, Heng; Spitz, Margaret R.; Ballard-Barbash, Rachel; Doroshow, James H.; Minasian, Lori M.; Medicine, School of MedicineRecent advances in genomic research have demonstrated a substantial role for genomic factors in predicting response to cancer therapies. Researchers in the fields of cancer pharmacogenomics and pharmacoepidemiology seek to understand why individuals respond differently to drug therapy, in terms of both adverse effects and treatment efficacy. To identify research priorities as well as the resources and infrastructure needed to advance these fields, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop titled “Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Setting a Research Agenda to Accelerate Translation” on July 21, 2009, in Bethesda, MD. In this commentary, we summarize and discuss five science-based recommendations and four infrastructure-based recommendations that were identified as a result of discussions held during this workshop. Key recommendations include 1) supporting the routine collection of germline and tumor biospecimens in NCI-sponsored clinical trials and in some observational and population-based studies; 2) incorporating pharmacogenomic markers into clinical trials; 3) addressing the ethical, legal, social, and biospecimen- and data-sharing implications of pharmacogenomic and pharmacoepidemiologic research; and 4) establishing partnerships across NCI, with other federal agencies, and with industry. Together, these recommendations will facilitate the discovery and validation of clinical, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and genomic markers related to cancer treatment response and adverse events, and they will improve both the speed and efficiency by which new pharmacogenomic and pharmacoepidemiologic information is translated into clinical practice.Item Correction: Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network(Springer Nature, 2019-07) Levy, Kenneth D.; Blake, Kathryn; Fletcher-Hoppe, Colette; Franciosi, James; Goto, Diasuke; Hicks, James K.; Holmes, Ann M.; Kanuri, Sri Harsha; Madden, Ebony B.; Musty, Michael D.; Orlando, Lori; Pratt, Victoria M.; Ramos, Michelle; Wu, Ryanne; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Medicine, School of MedicineThe original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, which was incorrectly given as Geoffrey Ginsburg. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article. Erratum for Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network. [Genet Med. 2019]Item Development of Competency-based Online Genomic Medicine Training (COGENT)(Taylor & Francis, 2023) Haga, Susanne B.; Chung, Wendy K.; Cubano, Luis A.; Curry, Timothy B.; Empey, Philip E.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Mangold, Kara; Miyake, Christina Y.; Prakash, Siddharth K.; Ramsey, Laura B.; Rowley, Robb; Rohrer Vitek, Carolyn R.; Skaar, Todd C.; Wynn, Julia; Manolio, Teri A.; Medicine, School of MedicineThe fields of genetics and genomics have greatly expanded across medicine through the development of new technologies that have revealed genetic contributions to a wide array of traits and diseases. Thus, the development of widely available educational resources for all healthcare providers is essential to ensure the timely and appropriate utilization of genetics and genomics patient care. In 2020, the National Human Genome Research Institute released a call for new proposals to develop accessible, sustainable online education for health providers. This paper describes the efforts of the six teams awarded to reach the goal of providing genetic and genomic training modules that are broadly available for busy clinicians.Item Establishing the value of genomics in medicine: the IGNITE Pragmatic Trials Network.(Springer, 2021-07) Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Cavallari, Larisa H.; Chakraborty, Hrishikesh; Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M.; Dexter, Paul R.; Eadon, Michael T.; Ferket, Bart S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Johnson, Julie A.; Kannry, Joseph; Kucher, Natalie; Madden, Ebony B.; Orlando, Lori A.; Parker, Wanda; Peterson, Josh; Pratt, Victoria M.; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder K.; Ramos, Michelle A.; Skaar, Todd C.; Sperber, Nina; Steen-Burrell, Kady-Ann; Van Driest, Sara L.; Voora, Deepak; Wiisanen, Kristin; Winterstein, Almut G.; Volpi, SimonaPURPOSE: A critical gap in the adoption of genomic medicine into medical practice is the need for the rigorous evaluation of the utility of genomic medicine interventions. METHODS: The Implementing Genomics in Practice Pragmatic Trials Network (IGNITE PTN) was formed in 2018 to measure the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genomic medicine interventions, to assess approaches for real-world application of genomic medicine in diverse clinical settings, and to produce generalizable knowledge on clinical trials using genomic interventions. Five clinical sites and a coordinating center evaluated trial proposals and developed working groups to enable their implementation. RESULTS: Two pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) have been initiated, one evaluating genetic risk APOL1 variants in African Americans in the management of their hypertension, and the other to evaluate the use of pharmacogenetic testing for medications to manage acute and chronic pain as well as depression. CONCLUSION: IGNITE PTN is a network that carries out PCTs in genomic medicine; it is focused on diversity and inclusion of underrepresented minority trial participants; it uses electronic health records and clinical decision support to deliver the interventions. IGNITE PTN will develop the evidence to support (or oppose) the adoption of genomic medicine interventions by patients, providers, and payers.Item Qualitative study of system-level factors related to genomic implementation(Springer Nature, 2019-07) Zebrowski, Alexis M.; Ellis, Darcy E.; Barg, Frances K.; Sperber, Nina R.; Bernhardt, Barbara A.; Denny, Joshua C.; Dexter, Paul R.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Johnson, Julie A.; Levy, Mia A.; Orlando, Lori A.; Pollin, Toni I.; Skaar, Todd C.; Kimmel, Stephen E.; Medicine, School of MedicinePURPOSE: Research on genomic medicine integration has focused on applications at the individual level, with less attention paid to implementation within clinical settings. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify system-level factors that played a role in implementation of genomic medicine within Implementing GeNomics In PracTicE (IGNITE) Network projects. METHODS: Up to four study personnel, including principal investigators and study coordinators from each of six IGNITE projects, were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide that asked interviewees to describe study site(s), progress at each site, and factors facilitating or impeding project implementation. Interviews were coded following CFIR inner-setting constructs. RESULTS: Key barriers included (1) limitations in integrating genomic data and clinical decision support tools into electronic health records, (2) physician reluctance toward genomic research participation and clinical implementation due to a limited evidence base, (3) inadequate reimbursement for genomic medicine, (4) communication among and between investigators and clinicians, and (5) lack of clinical and leadership engagement. CONCLUSION: Implementation of genomic medicine is hindered by several system-level barriers to both research and practice. Addressing these barriers may serve as important facilitators for studying and implementing genomics in practice.Item Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects(Wiley, 2018-05) Volpi, Simona; Bult, Carol J.; Chisholm, Rex L.; Deverka, Patricia A.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Jacob, Howard J.; Kasapi, Melpomeni; McLeod, Howard L.; Roden, Dan M.; Williams, Marc S.; Green, Eric D.; Rodriguez, Laura Lyman; Aronson, Samuel; Cavallari, Larisa H.; Denny, Joshua C.; Dressler, Lynn G.; Johnson, Julie A.; Klein, Teri E.; Leeder, J. Steven; Piquette-Miller, Micheline; Perera, Minoli; Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura J.; Rehm, Heidi L.; Ritchie, Marylyn D.; Skaar, Todd C.; Wagle, Nikhil; Weinshilboum, Richard; Weitzel, Kristin W.; Wildin, Robert; Wilson, John; Manolio, Teri A.; Relling, Mary V.; Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of MedicineResponse to a drug often differs widely among individual patients. This variability is frequently observed not only with respect to effective responses but also with adverse drug reactions. Matching patients to the drugs that are most likely to be effective and least likely to cause harm is the goal of effective therapeutics. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of precision medicine through elucidating the genetic determinants responsible for pharmacological outcomes and using them to guide drug selection and dosing. Here we survey the US landscape of research programs in PGx implementation, review current advances and clinical applications of PGx, summarize the obstacles that have hindered PGx implementation, and identify the critical knowledge gaps and possible studies needed to help to address them.Item Strategies to Integrate Genomic Medicine into Clinical Care: Evidence from the IGNITE Network(MDPI, 2021-07-08) Sperber, Nina R.; Dong, Olivia M.; Roberts, Megan C.; Dexter, Paul; Elsey, Amanda R.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Johnson, Julie A.; Levy, Kenneth D.; Ong, Henry; Peterson, Josh F.; Pollin, Toni I.; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder; Ramos, Michelle A.; Skaar, Todd C.; Orlando, Lori A.; Medicine, School of MedicineThe complexity of genomic medicine can be streamlined by implementing some form of clinical decision support (CDS) to guide clinicians in how to use and interpret personalized data; however, it is not yet clear which strategies are best suited for this purpose. In this study, we used implementation science to identify common strategies for applying provider-based CDS interventions across six genomic medicine clinical research projects funded by an NIH consortium. Each project’s strategies were elicited via a structured survey derived from a typology of implementation strategies, the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC), and follow-up interviews guided by both implementation strategy reporting criteria and a planning framework, RE-AIM, to obtain more detail about implementation strategies and desired outcomes. We found that, on average, the three pharmacogenomics implementation projects used more strategies than the disease-focused projects. Overall, projects had four implementation strategies in common; however, operationalization of each differed in accordance with each study’s implementation outcomes. These four common strategies may be important for precision medicine program implementation, and pharmacogenomics may require more integration into clinical care. Understanding how and why these strategies were successfully employed could be useful for others implementing genomic or precision medicine programs in different contexts.