- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Gill, Anthony J."
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Clues to Recognition of Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma: Findings From Cytologic and Limited Biopsy Samples(Wiley, 2018) Shyu, Irene; Mirsadraei, Leili; Wang, Xiaoyan; Robila, Valentina; Mehra, Rohit; McHugh, Jonathan B.; Chen, Ying-Bei; Udager, Aaron M.; Gill, Anthony J.; Cheng, Liang; Amin, Mahul B.; Lin, Oscar; Smith, Steven Christopher; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare and highly aggressive and is believed to arise mostly in the setting of hereditary leiomyomatosis-RCC syndrome with a germline mutation of FH. Because of the aggressiveness of these tumors and a frequent lack of ascertainable family history, these tumors may first present as metastases and be sampled by cytology. The cytologic findings of FH-deficient RCC have not previously been reported. Methods: Cytologic and limited biopsy samples from patients with FH-deficient RCC were reviewed retrospectively. Results: In total, 24 cytologic and limited biopsy samples from 19 patients (6 women and 13 men; age range, 22-69 years) who had FH-deficient RCC and metastasis at presentation were evaluated. These included 21 cytology samples ranging from malignant effusions (n = 7) to metastases (n = 11), to samples of primary kidney tumors (n = 3). The samples exhibited cells, often in clusters and abortive papillae, with voluminous, finely vacuolated cytoplasm and large, pleomorphic nuclei with prominent, viral inclusion-like nucleoli. A distinctive finding of peripheral cytoplasmic clearing frequently was apparent, and intranuclear cytoplasmic pseudoinclusions were less frequent. Of 7 cell block and biopsy samples, several of which represented sampling from the same patient, all demonstrated tissue fragments that had discernable morphologic patterns associated with FH-deficient RCC, including tubulocystic and intracystic papillary growth. Conclusions: Features characteristic and suggestive of FH-deficient RCC may be identified in cytologic and small biopsy samples. Although the current samples were identified retrospectively in well characterized cases of FH-deficient RCC, the authors argue that, with appropriate clinical correlation, these features are sufficiently distinctive to trigger recognition and confirmatory workup.Item Molecular pathology of urogenital tumors : Recommendations from the 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference(SpringerLink, 2021-05) Hommerding, Oliver; Allory, Yves; Argani, Pedram; Bismar, Tarek A.; Bubendorf, Lukas; Canete-Portillo, Sofía; Chaux, Alcides; Chen, Ying-Bei; Cheng, Liang; Cubilla, Antonio L.; Egevad, Lars; Gill, Anthony J.; Grignon, David J.; Hartmann, Arndt; Hes, Ondrej; Idrees, Muhammad T.; Kao, Chia-Sui; Knowles, Margaret A.; Looijenga, Leendert H.J.; Lotan, Tamara L.; Pritchard, Colin C.; Rubin, Mark A.; Tomlins, Scott A.; Van der Kwast, Theodorus H.; Velazquez, Elsa F.; Warrick, Joshua I.; Williamson, Sean R.; Kristiansen, Glen; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineComprehensive understanding of molecular principles in cancer and the diversification of oncological therapy promise individual therapeutic concepts, which have not yet found their way into urogenital cancer therapy. In March 2019 the International Society of Urogenital Pathology (ISUP) therefore held a consensus conference on recommendations for molecular diagnostics of genitourinary tumors, which were published in five separate manuscripts and are summarized in this article.In preparation for the conference, a comprehensive survey of current practices for molecular testing of urogenital tumors was carried out by members of the ISUP. At the conference, the results and the corresponding background information were presented by five working groups and recommendations for action for diagnostics were developed. An agreement between 66% of the conference participants was defined as consensus.Item Reappraisal of Morphological Differences between Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Collecting Duct Carcinoma, and Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma(Wolters Kluwer, 2018-03) Ohe, Chisato; Smith, Steven C.; Sirohi, Deepika; Divatia, Mukul; de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza; Paner, Gladell P.; Agaimy, Abbas; Amin, Mitual B.; Argani, Pedram; Chen, Ying-Bei; Cheng, Liang; Colecchia, Maurizio; Compérat, Eva; Werneck da Cunha, Isabela; Epstein, Jonathan I.; Gill, Anthony J.; Hes, Ondřej; Hirsch, Michelle; Jochum, Wolfram; Kunju, Lakshmi P.; Maclean, Fiona; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; McKenney, Jesse K.; Mehra, Rohit; Nesi, Gabriella; Osunkoya, Adeboye O.; Picken, Maria M.; Rao, Priya; Reuter, Victor E.; Guilherme de Oliveira Salles, Paulo; Schultz, Luciana; Tickoo, Satish K.; Tomlins, Scott A.; Trpkov, Kiril; Amin, Mahul B.; Medicine, School of MedicineRenal medullary carcinomas (RMCs) and collecting duct carcinomas (CDCs) are rare subsets of lethal high-stage, high-grade distal nephron-related adenocarcinomas with a predilection for the renal medullary region. Recent findings have established an emerging group of fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient tumors related to hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC-RCCs) syndrome within this morphologic spectrum. Recently developed, reliable ancillary testing has enabled consistent separation between these tumor types. Here, we present the clinicopathologic features and differences in the morphologic patterns between RMC, CDC, and FH-deficient RCC in consequence of these recent developments. This study included a total of 100 cases classified using contemporary criteria and ancillary tests. Thirty-three RMCs (SMARCB1/INI1-deficient, hemoglobinopathy), 38 CDCs (SMARCB1/INI1-retained), and 29 RCCs defined by the FH-deficient phenotype (FH/2SC or FH/2SC with FH mutation, regardless of HLRCC syndromic stigmata/history) were selected. The spectrum of morphologic patterns was critically evaluated, and the differences between the morphologic patterns present in the 3 groups were analyzed statistically. Twenty-five percent of cases initially diagnosed as CDC were reclassified as FH-deficient RCC on the basis of our contemporary diagnostic approach. Among the different overlapping morphologic patterns, sieve-like/cribriform and reticular/yolk sac tumor-like patterns favored RMCs, whereas intracystic papillary and tubulocystic patterns favored FH-deficient RCC. The tubulopapillary pattern favored both CDCs and FH-deficient RCCs, and the multinodular infiltrating papillary pattern favored CDCs. Infiltrating glandular and solid sheets/cords/nested patterns were not statistically different among the 3 groups. Viral inclusion-like macronucleoli, considered as a hallmark of HLRCC-RCCs, were observed significantly more frequently in FH-deficient RCCs. Despite the overlapping morphology found among these clinically aggressive infiltrating high-grade adenocarcinomas of the kidney, reproducible differences in morphology emerged between these categories after rigorous characterization. Finally, we recommend that definitive diagnosis of CDC should only be made if RMC and FH-deficient RCC are excluded.Item Report From the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consultation Conference on Molecular Pathology of Urogenital Cancers: III: Molecular Pathology of Kidney Cancer(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-07) Williamson, Sean R.; Gill, Anthony J.; Argani, Pedram; Chen, Ying-Bei; Egevad, Lars; Kristiansen, Glen; Grignon, David J.; Hes, Ondrej; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes are increasingly being discerned via their molecular underpinnings. Frequently this can be correlated to histologic and immunohistochemical surrogates, such that only simple targeted molecular assays, or none at all, are needed for diagnostic confirmation. In clear cell RCC, VHL mutation and 3p loss are well known; however, other genes with emerging important roles include SETD2, BAP1, and PBRM1, among others. Papillary RCC type 2 is now known to include likely several different molecular entities, such as fumarate hydratase (FH) deficient RCC. In MIT family translocation RCC, an increasing number of gene fusions are now described. Some TFE3 fusion partners, such as NONO, GRIPAP1, RBMX, and RBM10 may show a deceptive FISH result due to the proximity of the genes on the same chromosome. FH and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficient RCC have implications for patient counseling due to heritable syndromes and the aggressiveness of FH-deficient RCC. Immunohistochemistry is increasingly available and helpful for recognizing both. Emerging tumor types with strong evidence for distinct diagnostic entities include eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC and TFEB / VEGFA / 6p21 amplified RCC. Other emerging entities that are less clearly understood include TCEB1 mutated RCC, RCC with ALK rearrangement, renal neoplasms with mutations of TSC2 or MTOR, and RCC with fibromuscular stroma. In metastatic RCC, the role of molecular studies is not entirely defined at present, although there may be an increasing role for genomic analysis related to specific therapy pathways, such as for tyrosine kinase or MTOR inhibitors.Item The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Orbit(Karger, 2023) Milman, Tatyana; Grossniklaus, Hans E.; Goldman-Levy, Gabrielle; Kivelä, Tero T.; Coupland, Sarah E.; White, Valerie A.; Mudhar, Hardeep Singh; Eberhart, Charles G.; Verdijk, Robert M.; Heegaard, Steffen; Gill, Anthony J.; Jager, Martine J.; Rodríguez-Reyes, Abelardo A.; Esmaeli, Bita; Hodge, Jennelle C.; Cree, Ian A.; WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine