- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Gao, Jia-Hong"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Brain-age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size(Wiley, 2024) Yu, Yuetong; Cui, Hao-Qi; Haas, Shalaila S.; New, Faye; Sanford, Nicole; Yu, Kevin; Zhan, Denghuang; Yang, Guoyuan; Gao, Jia-Hong; Wei, Dongtao; Qiu, Jiang; Banaj, Nerisa; Boomsma, Dorret I.; Breier, Alan; Brodaty, Henry; Buckner, Randy L.; Buitelaar, Jan K.; Cannon, Dara M.; Caseras, Xavier; Clark, Vincent P.; Conrod, Patricia J.; Crivello, Fabrice; Crone, Eveline A.; Dannlowski, Udo; Davey, Christopher G.; de Haan, Lieuwe; de Zubicaray, Greig I.; Di Giorgio, Annabella; Fisch, Lukas; Fisher, Simon E.; Franke, Barbara; Glahn, David C.; Grotegerd, Dominik; Gruber, Oliver; Gur, Raquel E.; Gur, Ruben C.; Hahn, Tim; Harrison, Ben J.; Hatton, Sean; Hickie, Ian B.; Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E.; Jamieson, Alec J.; Jernigan, Terry L.; Jiang, Jiyang; Kalnin, Andrew J.; Kang, Sim; Kochan, Nicole A.; Kraus, Anna; Lagopoulos, Jim; Lazaro, Luisa; McDonald, Brenna C.; McDonald, Colm; McMahon, Katie L.; Mwangi, Benson; Piras, Fabrizio; Rodriguez-Cruces, Raul; Royer, Jessica; Sachdev, Perminder S.; Satterthwaite, Theodore D.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Schumann, Gunter; Sevaggi, Pierluigi; Smoller, Jordan W.; Soares, Jair C.; Spalletta, Gianfranco; Tamnes, Christian K.; Trollor, Julian N.; Van't Ent, Dennis; Vecchio, Daniela; Walter, Henrik; Wang, Yang; Weber, Bernd; Wen, Wei; Wierenga, Lara M.; Williams, Steven C. R.; Wu, Mon-Ju; Zunta-Soares, Giovana B.; Bernhardt, Boris; Thompson, Paul; Frangou, Sophia; Ge, Ruiyang; ENIGMA-Lifespan Working Group; Psychiatry, School of MedicineStructural neuroimaging data have been used to compute an estimate of the biological age of the brain (brain-age) which has been associated with other biologically and behaviorally meaningful measures of brain development and aging. The ongoing research interest in brain-age has highlighted the need for robust and publicly available brain-age models pre-trained on data from large samples of healthy individuals. To address this need we have previously released a developmental brain-age model. Here we expand this work to develop, empirically validate, and disseminate a pre-trained brain-age model to cover most of the human lifespan. To achieve this, we selected the best-performing model after systematically examining the impact of seven site harmonization strategies, age range, and sample size on brain-age prediction in a discovery sample of brain morphometric measures from 35,683 healthy individuals (age range: 5-90 years; 53.59% female). The pre-trained models were tested for cross-dataset generalizability in an independent sample comprising 2101 healthy individuals (age range: 8-80 years; 55.35% female) and for longitudinal consistency in a further sample comprising 377 healthy individuals (age range: 9-25 years; 49.87% female). This empirical examination yielded the following findings: (1) the accuracy of age prediction from morphometry data was higher when no site harmonization was applied; (2) dividing the discovery sample into two age-bins (5-40 and 40-90 years) provided a better balance between model accuracy and explained age variance than other alternatives; (3) model accuracy for brain-age prediction plateaued at a sample size exceeding 1600 participants. These findings have been incorporated into CentileBrain (https://centilebrain.org/#/brainAGE2), an open-science, web-based platform for individualized neuroimaging metrics.