ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Fulton, Janet"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adoption and Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
    (2020-06) Thoele, Kelli Marie; Newhouse, Robin; Draucker, Claire Burke; Harle, Christopher; Fulton, Janet
    More than 20 million people in the United States have a substance use disorder, resulting in negative individual and societal outcomes. An evidence-based intervention, Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), involves screening patients to assess for substance use and then providing a brief intervention and referral to treatment when indicated. This evidence-based intervention is underutilized in healthcare settings. The purpose of this dissertation was to contribute to the body of evidence regarding the implementation of SBIRT in healthcare settings. Specifically, the aims of this dissertation were to 1) provide an overview of the evidence regarding the use of implementation strategies to facilitate the implementation of SBIRT, 2) describe implementation of SBIRT by nurses in acute care hospitals, and 3) examine individual and organizational characteristics associated with the intra-organizational adoption of SBIRT. To review the literature, a scoping review was completed on 18 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The review found that leaders often train and educate stakeholders to facilitate the implementation of SBIRT, but less attention has been given to adapting the intervention or engaging patients. Additionally, implementation efforts led to increases in screening, but the evidence regarding the effect on brief intervention is inconclusive, and evidence regarding referral to treatment is scarce. Eighteen nurses participated in a qualitative descriptive study of the implementation of SBIRT, and data were analyzed using content analysis. Participants identified barriers and facilitators associated with the nurses’ attitudes and beliefs about SBIRT, organizational factors, and patients’ response to the SBIRT process. Participants indicated that SBIRT was a useful intervention that was best implemented by providing a clear process and incorporating SBIRT into an established workflow. To examine factors related to intra-organizational adoption of a tool to screen patients for substance use, two hundred twenty-two nurses participated in a crosssectional study. Results of this study indicate that training and the perception of peer usage of the intervention were significantly related to individual nurses’ use of the intervention in practice. The findings of this dissertation can inform research and practice regarding the implementation of SBIRT in healthcare settings.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hospital-associated functional status decline in pulmonary patients
    (2017-06-26) Shay, Amy Cornett; Fulton, Janet; Von Ah, Diane; Otte, Julie Elam; Warden, Stuart J.; O'Malley, Patricia
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant worldwide cause of chronic illness and mortality and one of the most common admitting diagnoses in the United States. Persons with COPD are at increased risk for deconditioning during hospitalization, which can lead to decreased functional status at discharge. Disease-related factors and elements of the hospital environment make older adults with COPD vulnerable to hospital-associated functional status decline. The purpose of this dissertation was to identify activity factors that contribute to hospital-associated functional status decline in older adults with COPD by promoting functioning during hospitalization. This predictive correlational study is a secondary analysis of a pre-existing dataset. Patients with COPD were pulled from the larger parent study sample for comparison with patients without COPD. The convenience sample consisted of 111 patients with COPD and 190 patients without COPD. Subjects were 46.5% male, 53.5% female, and a mean age of 66 years. All subjects were patients admitted to a pulmonary unit and received an intervention protocol designed to address mobility barriers related to COPD and hospitalization. Statistical analysis explored the number, type, and timing of activity events in relation to the selected functional status outcomes of discharge disposition, length of hospital stay, and 30-day readmission rates for hospitalized older adults with COPD. Multivariate and bivariate analyses results indicated ambulation to the bathroom, ambulation outside the patient room, and number of days to first out-of-bed activity were significant predictors (p < 0.05) of patient discharge to home; days to first activity and ambulation were significant predictors (p < 0.05) of reduced length of stay; none of the variables were predictive of 30-day readmission. Patients with COPD experienced longer lengths of stay and more non-weight bearing activity than patients without COPD in this sample. These findings provide a foundation for future research to explore hospital environmental factors influencing mobility, determine optimal modes of activity during hospitalization, and examine potential cost savings associated with promotion of early mobility. Findings help explain the effects of physical activity during hospitalization and may aid development of nursing interventions to prevent or alleviate functional status decline in this vulnerable population.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Readmissions in Older Adults
    (2020-08) Hodge, Kimberly Sue; Fulton, Janet; Ebright, Patricia; Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn; Huber, Lesa
    Hospital readmission is of growing importance in the healthcare industry because of associated patient and system costs, impact to the quality of patient care, and hospital Medicare payment penalties. The increasing interest in sepsis readmission prevention has highlighted the uniqueness of severe sepsis or septic shock survivors. The results of this study provide insight into the relationship between index hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions for older adults (> 65 years) who discharged home from an index hospital with a principle or secondary discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between index hospital LOS and 30-day readmissions in older adults (> 65 years) whose expected primary payer was Medicare and who discharged home with a principle or secondary diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Data used to answer the proposed research questions consisted of older adult discharge records from the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Differences in 30-day readmissions between older adult age groups, gender, and older adult location were examined. The number of days to readmission since discharge was evaluated for the subset of older adults with a readmission. Approximately 15.6% of older adults were readmitted within 30 days of their discharge. Readmissions were statistically different based on the older adult’s age, gender, and LOS. Location did not have a significant effect on readmissions. Mean LOS among readmitted older adults was 10.1 days. Analysis indicates that an older adult’s LOS had a significant effect on readmissions, although models performed poorly. Findings suggest that there are certain factors that can predict older adults who are at risk for being readmitted after being discharged with a principle or secondary discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Strategies to promote the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in healthcare settings: a scoping review
    (BMC, 2021-05-11) Thoele, Kelli; Moffat, Laura; Konicek, Stephanie; Lam-Chi, Monika; Newkirk, Erica; Fulton, Janet; Newhouse, Robin; School of Nursing
    Background: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT), is an approach for the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders, but is often underutilized in healthcare settings. Although the implementation of SBIRT is challenging, the use of multi-faceted and higher intensity strategies are more likely to result in the successful incorporation of SBIRT into practice in primary care settings. SBIRT may be used in different healthcare settings, and the context for implementation and types of strategies used to support implementation may vary by setting. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview regarding the use of strategies to support implementation of SBIRT in all healthcare settings and describe the associated outcomes. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using CINAHL Complete, HealthBusiness FullTEXT, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase to search for articles published in English prior to September 2019. The search returned 462 citations, with 18 articles included in the review. Two independent reviewers extracted data from each article regarding the theory, design, timeline, location, setting, patient population, substance type, provider, sample size and type, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. The reviewers entered all extracted data entered into a table and then summarized the results. Results: Most of the studies were conducted in the United States in primary care or emergency department settings, and the majority of studies focused on SBIRT to address alcohol use in adults. The most commonly used strategies to support implementation included training and educating stakeholders or developing stakeholder interrelationships. In contrast, only a few studies engaged patients or consumers in the implementation process. Efforts to support implementation often resulted in an increase in screening, but the evidence regarding the brief intervention is less clear, and most studies did not assess the reach or adoption of the referral to treatment. Discussion: In addition to summarizing the strategies used to increase reach and adoption of SBIRT in healthcare settings, this scoping review identified multiple gaps in the literature. Two major gaps include implementation of SBIRT in acute care settings and the application of implementation theories to inform healthcare efforts to enable use of SBIRT.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University