Browsing by Author "Fu, Shuangshuang"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and risk of melanoma: A meta-analysis
    (Elsevier, 2017-09) Tang, Huilin; Wu, Wenting; Fu, Shuangshuang; Zhai, Suodi; Song, Yiqing; Han, Jiali; Epidemiology, School of Public Health
    Background The association between phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors and melanoma risk is controversial. Objective We quantify the association between use of PDE5 inhibitors and melanoma. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that were conducted up to July 13, 2016, and evaluated the association between PDE5 inhibitors and skin cancer. Random effects meta-analyses were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Five observational studies were included. Compared with PDE5 inhibitor nonuse, PDE5 inhibitor use was slightly but significantly associated with an increased risk for development of melanoma (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) and basal cell carcinoma (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19) but not squamous cell carcinoma. For melanoma risk, none of the prespecified factors (dose of PDE5 inhibitor, study design, and study region) significantly affected the results (P > .05). Our sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results. Limitations We included only observational studies, which had some heterogeneities and inconsistent controlling for potential confounders. Conclusions Use of PDE5 inhibitors may be associated with a slightly increased risk for development of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma but not squamous cell carcinoma. However, further large well-conducted prospective studies with adequate adjustment for potential confounders are required for confirmation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (Wiley, 2018-04) Tang, Huilin; Shi, Weilong; Fu, Shuangshuang; Wang, Tiansheng; Zhai, Suodi; Song, Yiqing; Han, Jiali; Epidemiology, School of Public Health
    Current evidence about the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk remains conflict. We aimed to assess the risk of bladder cancer associated with the use of pioglitazone and identify modifiers that affect the results. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 25 August 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk. Conventional and cumulative meta-analyses were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A restricted spline regression analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationship with a generalized least-squares trend test. We included two RCTs involving 9114 patients and 20 observational studies (n = 4,846,088 individuals). An increased risk of bladder cancer in patients treated with pioglitazone versus placebo was noted from RCTs (OR, 1.84; 95%CI, 0.99 to 3.42). In observational studies, the increased risk of bladder cancer was slight but significant among ever-users of pioglitazone versus never-users (OR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.03 to 1.25), which appeared to be both time- (P = 0.003) and dose-dependent (P = 0.05). In addition, we observed the association differed by region of studies (Europe, United States, or Asia) or source of funding (sponsored by industry or not). Current evidence suggests that pioglitazone may increase the risk of bladder cancer, possibly in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Patients with long-term and high-dose exposure to pioglitazone should be monitored regularly for signs of bladder cancer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of antihypertensive drugs and risk of keratinocyte carcinoma: A meta‐analysis of observational studies
    (Wiley, 2018-03) Tang, Huilin; Fu, Shuangshuang; Zhai, Suodi; Song, Yiqing; Asgari, Maryam M.; Han, Jiali; Epidemiology, School of Public Health
    Purpose Current epidemiologic evidence on the association between antihypertensive drugs and keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) risk is inconsistent. We sought to quantify this association by meta‐analysis of observational studies. Methods We systematically reviewed observational studies published through August 2016 and reported the KC risk (basal cell carcinoma [BCC] and squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) associated with antihypertensive drugs, including diuretics, angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta‐adrenergic blocking agents (β‐blockers), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Ten eligible studies were included. Compared with nonuse, diuretic use was significantly associated with increased risk of both BCC (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01‐1.20) and SCC (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19‐1.66). Use of β‐blockers or CCBs was associated with increased risk of BCC (but not SCC); the OR with β‐blockers was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04‐1.15) and with CCBs was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09‐1.21). Use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs was associated with decreased risk of both BCC (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39‐0.71) and SCC (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42‐0.80) in high‐risk individuals. Conclusions Current evidence indicates that use of diuretics might be associated with increased risk of KC, while ACE inhibitors or ARBs might be associated with decreased risk in high‐risk individuals. β‐blockers or CCBs might be positively associated with BCC risk. Further postmarketing surveillance studies and investigations to clarify the possible underlying mechanisms are warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of Antihypertensive Drugs and Risk of Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
    (Springer, 2018-02) Tang, Huilin; Fu, Shuangshuang; Zhai, Suodi; Song, Yiqing; Han, Jiali; Epidemiology, School of Public Health
    Introduction Several antihypertensive drugs are photosensitizing and may promote the development of malignant melanoma (MM), but evidence remains inconsistent. We sought to quantify the association between use of antihypertensive drugs and MM risk. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to August 17, 2017 to identify observational studies that reported the MM risk associated with the use of antihypertensive drugs. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Overall, we included eight observational studies (two cohort studies and six case–control studies). Compared with non-use, use of diuretics (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.03–1.17) or β-adrenergic blocking agents (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04–1.37) was significantly associated with increased risk of MM. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.95–1.23), angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.95–1.31), and calcium channel blockers (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.72–1.74) was not significantly associated with increased risk of MM. Conclusions Current evidence from observational studies suggests that use of diuretics or β-adrenergic blocking agents may be associated with increased risk of MM. Further large well-conducted prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.