Browsing by Author "Fox, Mark D."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Immuno-Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19: Implications for Timing of Surgery and Anticoagulation
    (Frontiers Media, 2022-05-04) Bunch, Connor M.; Moore, Ernest E.; Moore, Hunter B.; Neal, Matthew D.; Thomas, Anthony V.; Zackariya, Nuha; Zhao, Jonathan; Zackariya, Sufyan; Brenner, Toby J.; Berquist, Margaret; Buckner, Hallie; Wiarda, Grant; Fulkerson, Daniel; Huff, Wei; Kwaan, Hau C.; Lankowicz, Genevieve; Laubscher, Gert J.; Lourens, Petrus J.; Pretorius, Etheresia; Kotze, Maritha J.; Moolla, Muhammad S.; Sithole, Sithembiso; Maponga, Tongai G.; Kell, Douglas B.; Fox, Mark D.; Gillespie, Laura; Khan, Rashid Z.; Mamczak, Christiaan N.; March, Robert; Macias, Rachel; Bull, Brian S.; Walsh, Mark M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, global governing bodies prioritized transmissibility-based precautions and hospital capacity as the foundation for delay of elective procedures. As elective surgical volumes increased, convalescent COVID-19 patients faced increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and clinicians had limited evidence for stratifying individual risk in this population. Clear evidence now demonstrates that those recovering from COVID-19 have increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. These data-in conjunction with the recent American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines-offer the evidence necessary to expand the early pandemic guidelines and guide the surgeon's preoperative risk assessment. Here, we argue elective surgeries should still be delayed on a personalized basis to maximize postoperative outcomes. We outline a framework for stratifying the individual COVID-19 patient's fitness for surgery based on the symptoms and severity of acute or convalescent COVID-19 illness, coagulopathy assessment, and acuity of the surgical procedure. Although the most common manifestation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is COVID-19 pneumonitis, every system in the body is potentially afflicted by an endotheliitis. This endothelial derangement most often manifests as a hypercoagulable state on admission with associated occult and symptomatic venous and arterial thromboembolisms. The delicate balance between hyper and hypocoagulable states is defined by the local immune-thrombotic crosstalk that results commonly in a hemostatic derangement known as fibrinolytic shutdown. In tandem, the hemostatic derangements that occur during acute COVID-19 infection affect not only the timing of surgical procedures, but also the incidence of postoperative hemostatic complications related to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC). Traditional methods of thromboprophylaxis and treatment of thromboses after surgery require a tailored approach guided by an understanding of the pathophysiologic underpinnings of the COVID-19 patient. Likewise, a prolonged period of risk for developing hemostatic complications following hospitalization due to COVID-19 has resulted in guidelines from differing societies that recommend varying periods of delay following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In conclusion, we propose the perioperative, personalized assessment of COVID-19 patients' CAC using viscoelastic hemostatic assays and fluorescent microclot analysis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Markers of Futile Resuscitation in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Review of the Evidence and a Proposal for Futility Time-Outs during Massive Transfusion
    (MDPI, 2024-08-09) Walsh, Mark M.; Fox, Mark D.; Moore, Ernest E.; Johnson, Jeffrey L.; Bunch, Connor M.; Miller, Joseph B.; Lopez-Plaza, Ileana; Brancamp, Rachel L.; Waxman, Dan A.; Thomas, Scott G.; Fulkerson, Daniel H.; Thomas, Emmanuel J.; Khan, Hassaan A.; Zackariya, Sufyan K.; Al-Fadhl, Mahmoud D.; Zackariya, Saniya K.; Thomas, Samuel J.; Aboukhaled, Michael W.; Futile Indicators for Stopping Transfusion in Trauma (FISTT) Collaborative Group; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The reduction in the blood supply following the 2019 coronavirus pandemic has been exacerbated by the increased use of balanced resuscitation with blood components including whole blood in urban trauma centers. This reduction of the blood supply has diminished the ability of blood banks to maintain a constant supply to meet the demands associated with periodic surges of urban trauma resuscitation. This scarcity has highlighted the need for increased vigilance through blood product stewardship, particularly among severely bleeding trauma patients (SBTPs). This stewardship can be enhanced by the identification of reliable clinical and laboratory parameters which accurately indicate when massive transfusion is futile. Consequently, there has been a recent attempt to develop scoring systems in the prehospital and emergency department settings which include clinical, laboratory, and physiologic parameters and blood products per hour transfused as predictors of futile resuscitation. Defining futility in SBTPs, however, remains unclear, and there is only nascent literature which defines those criteria which reliably predict futility in SBTPs. The purpose of this review is to provide a focused examination of the literature in order to define reliable parameters of futility in SBTPs. The knowledge of these reliable parameters of futility may help define a foundation for drawing conclusions which will provide a clear roadmap for traumatologists when confronted with SBTPs who are candidates for the declaration of futility. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the definition of futile resuscitation for patients with trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock, and we propose a concise roadmap for clinicians to help them use well-defined clinical, laboratory, and viscoelastic parameters which can define futility.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Response to a COVID-19 Outbreak on a University Campus — Indiana, August 2020
    (CDC, 2021) Fox, Mark D.; Bailey, David C.; Seamon, Michael D.; Miranda, Marie Lynn; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Institutions of higher education adopted different approaches for the fall semester 2020 in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Approximately 45% of colleges and universities implemented online instruction, more than one fourth (27%) provided in-person instruction, and 21% used a hybrid model (1). Although CDC has published COVID-19 guidance for institutions of higher education (2–4), little has been published regarding the response to COVID-19 outbreaks on college and university campuses (5). In August 2020, an Indiana university with approximately 12,000 students (including 8,000 undergraduate students, 85% of whom lived on campus) implemented various public health measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Despite these measures, the university experienced an outbreak involving 371 cases during the first few weeks of the fall semester. The majority of cases occurred among undergraduate students living off campus, and several large off-campus gatherings were identified as common sources of exposure. Rather than sending students home, the university switched from in-person to online instruction for undergraduate students and instituted a series of campus restrictions for 2 weeks, during which testing, contact tracing, and isolation and quarantine programs were substantially enhanced, along with educational efforts highlighting the need for strict adherence to the mitigation measures. After 2 weeks, the university implemented a phased return to in-person instruction (with 85% of classes offered in person) and resumption of student life activities. This report describes the outbreak and the data-driven, targeted interventions and rapid escalation of testing, tracing, and isolation measures that enabled the medium-sized university to resume in-person instruction and campus activities. These strategies might prove useful to other colleges and universities responding to campus outbreaks.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock
    (MDPI, 2024-07-03) Al-Fadhl, Mahmoud D.; Karam, Marie Nour; Chen, Jenny; Zackariya, Sufyan K.; Lain, Morgan C.; Bales, John R.; Higgins, Alexis B.; Laing, Jordan T.; Wang, Hannah S.; Andrews, Madeline G.; Thomas, Anthony V.; Smith, Leah; Fox, Mark D.; Zackariya, Saniya K.; Thomas, Samuel J.; Tincher, Anna M.; Al-Fadhl, Hamid D.; Weston, May; Marsh, Phillip L.; Khan, Hassaan A.; Thomas, Emmanuel J.; Miller, Joseph B.; Bailey, Jason A.; Koenig, Justin J.; Waxman, Dan A.; Srikureja, Daniel; Fulkerson, Daniel H.; Fox, Sarah; Bingaman, Greg; Zimmer, Donald F.; Thompson, Mark A.; Bunch, Connor M.; Walsh, Mark M.; Futile Indicators for Stopping Transfusion in Trauma (FISTT) Collaborative Group; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    This review explores the concept of futility timeouts and the use of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as an independent predictor of the futility of resuscitation efforts in severely bleeding trauma patients. The national blood supply shortage has been exacerbated by the lingering influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of blood donors available, as well as by the adoption of balanced hemostatic resuscitation protocols (such as the increasing use of 1:1:1 packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets) with and without early whole blood resuscitation. This has underscored the urgent need for reliable predictors of futile resuscitation (FR). As a result, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory bedside markers have emerged which can accurately predict FR in patients with severe trauma-induced hemorrhage, such as the Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures (STOP) criteria. However, the STOP criteria do not include markers for TBI severity or transfusion cut points despite these patients requiring large quantities of blood components in the STOP criteria validation cohort. Yet, guidelines for neuroprognosticating patients with TBI can require up to 72 h, which makes them less useful in the minutes and hours following initial presentation. We examine the impact of TBI on bleeding trauma patients, with a focus on those with coagulopathies associated with TBI. This review categorizes TBI into isolated TBI (iTBI), hemorrhagic isolated TBI (hiTBI), and polytraumatic TBI (ptTBI). Through an analysis of bedside parameters (such as the proposed STOP criteria), coagulation assays, markers for TBI severity, and transfusion cut points as markers of futilty, we suggest amendments to current guidelines and the development of more precise algorithms that incorporate prognostic indicators of severe TBI as an independent parameter for the early prediction of FR so as to optimize blood product allocation.