- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Evans Phillips, Anna"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Characterizing mechanism-based pain phenotypes in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a cross-sectional analysis of the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Saloman, Jami L.; Conwell, Darwin L.; Fogel, Evan; Vege, Santhi Swaroop; Li, Liang; Li, Shuang; Andersen, Dana K.; Fisher, William E.; Forsmark, Christopher E.; Hart, Phil A.; Pandol, Stephen J.; Park, Walter G.; Evans Phillips, Anna; Topazian, Mark; Van Den Eeden, Stephen K.; Serrano, Jose; Yadav, Dhiraj; Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreatic Cancer; Medicine, School of MedicinePain is common in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and profoundly reduces quality of life (QoL). Multiple underlying mechanisms contribute to a heterogenous pain experience and reduce efficacy of pain management. This study was designed to characterize the distribution of mechanism-based pain phenotypes in painful CP. The data analyzed were collected as part of the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies, an NCI/NIDDK-funded longitudinal study of the natural history of CP. The PROspective Evaluation of Chronic pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and translational stuDies includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of pain, medication use, global health, and QoL. Of subjects (N = 681) with CP, 80% experienced abdominal pain within the year before enrollment. Subjects who experienced pain in the week before enrollment (N = 391) completed PROMIS Neuropathic and Nociceptive Pain Quality instruments which were then used to classify them by pain type: 40% had nociceptive, 5% had neuropathic-like, and 32% had both types of pain. The prevalence of having both types of pain was higher among women and subjects with diabetes mellitus, whereas nociceptive-only pain was more prevalent among men and those with pancreatic duct stricture. Other factors, including pain medication use and healthcare utilization, did not differ between groups based on pain type. Subjects in the Both group had significantly worse health and QoL scores relative to those with nociceptive-only pain, suggesting that using psychosocial pain surveys may be useful for understanding pain subtypes in patients with CP. Additional research is needed to identify biochemical and biophysical signatures that may associate with and predict responses to mechanism-specific interventions.Item Clinical Trials in Pancreatitis: Opportunities and Challenges in the Design and Conduct of Patient-Focused Clinical Trials in Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop(Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Hart, Phil A.; Andersen, Dana K.; Lyons, Erica; Cote, Gregory A.; Cruz-Monserrate, Zobeida; Dworkin, Robert H.; Elmunzer, B. Joseph; Fogel, Evan L.; Forsmark, Christopher E.; Gilron, Ian; Golden, Megan; Gozu, Aysegul; McNair, Lindsay; Pandol, Stephen J.; Perito, Emily R.; Evans Phillips, Anna; Rabbitts, Jennifer A.; Whitcomb, David C.; Windsor, John A.; Yadav, Dhiraj; Palermo, Tonya M.; Medicine, School of MedicineRecurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis represent high morbidity diseases, which are frequently associated with chronic abdominal pain, pancreatic insufficiencies, and reduced quality of life. Currently, there are no therapies to reverse or delay disease progression, and clinical trials are needed to investigate potential interventions that would address this important gap. This conference report provides details regarding information shared during a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases-sponsored workshop on Clinical Trials in Pancreatitis that sought to clearly delineate the current gaps and opportunities related to the design and conduct of patient-focused trials in recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis. Key stakeholders including representatives from patient advocacy organizations, physician investigators (including clinical trialists), the US Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institutes of Health convened to discuss challenges and opportunities with particular emphasis on lessons learned from trials in participants with other painful conditions, as well as the value of incorporating the patient perspective throughout all stages of trials.Item Dynamic changes in the pancreatitis activity scoring system during hospital course in a multicenter, prospective cohort(Wiley, 2021) Paragomi, Pedram; Tuft, Marie; Pothoulakis, loannis; Singh, Vikesh K.; Stevens, Tyler; Nawaz, Haq; Easler, Jeffrey J.; Thakkar, Shyam; Cote, Gregory A.; Lee, Peter J.; Akshintala, Venkata; Kamal, Ayesha; Gougol, Amir; Evans Phillips, Anna; Machicado, Jorge D.; Whitcomb, David C.; Greer, Phil J.; Buxbaum, James L.; Hart, Phil; Conwell, Darwin; Tang, Gong; Wu, Bechien U.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground and aim: The primary aim was to validate the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System (PASS) in a multicenter prospectively ascertained acute pancreatitis (AP) cohort. Second, we investigated the association of early PASS trajectories with disease severity and length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: Data were prospectively collected through the APPRENTICE consortium (2015-2018). AP severity was categorized based on revised Atlanta classification. Delta PASS (ΔPASS) was calculated by subtracting activity score from baseline value. PASS trajectories were compared between severity subsets. Subsequently, the cohort was subdivided into three LOS subgroups as short (S-LOS): 2-3 days; intermediate (I-LOS): 3-7 days; and long (L-LOS): ≥7 days. The generalized estimating equations model was implemented to compare PASS trajectories. Results: There were 434 subjects analyzed including 322 (74%) mild, 86 (20%) moderately severe, and 26 (6%) severe AP. Severe AP subjects had the highest activity levels and the slowest rate of decline in activity (P = 0.039). Focusing on mild AP, L-LOS subjects (34%) had 28 points per day slower decline; whereas, S-LOS group (13%) showed 34 points per day sharper decrease compared with I-LOS (53%; P < 0.001). We noticed an outlier subset with a median admission-PASS of 466 compared with 140 in the rest. Morphine equivalent dose constituted 80% of the total PASS in the outliers (median morphine equivalent dose score = 392), compared with only 25% in normal-range subjects (score = 33, P value < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlighted that PASS can quantify AP activity. Significant differences in PASS trajectories were found both in revised Atlanta classification severity and LOS groups, which can be harnessed in AP monitoring/management (ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT03075618).Item Rationale and Design for the Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms (DREAM) Study: A Prospective Cohort Study From the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium (T1DAPC)(Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Hart, Phil A.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Park, Walter G.; Dyer, Anne-Marie; Chinchilli, Vernon M.; Afghani, Elham; Akshintala, Venkata S.; Andersen, Dana K.; Buxbaum, James L.; Conwell, Darwin L.; Dungan, Kathleen M.; Easler, Jeffrey J.; Fogel, Evan L.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Kalyani, Rita R.; Korc, Murray; Kozarek, Richard; Laughlin, Maren R.; Lee, Peter J.; Maranki, Jennifer L.; Pandol, Stephen J.; Evans Phillips, Anna; Serrano, Jose; Singh, Vikesh K.; Speake, Cate; Tirkes, Temel; Toledo, Frederico G. S.; Trikudanathan, Guru; Vege, Santhi Swaroop; Wang, Ming; Yazici, Cemal; Zaheer, Atif; Forsmark, Christopher E.; Bellin, Melena D.; Yadav, Dhiraj; Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium (T1DAPC); Medicine, School of MedicineAcute pancreatitis (AP) is a disease characterized by an acute inflammatory phase followed by a convalescent phase. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was historically felt to be a transient phenomenon related to acute inflammation; however, it is increasingly recognized as an important late and chronic complication. There are several challenges that have prevented precisely determining the incidence rate of DM after AP and understanding the underlying mechanisms. The DREAM (Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and its Mechanisms) Study is a prospective cohort study designed to address these and other knowledge gaps to provide the evidence needed to screen for, prevent, and treat DM after AP. In the following article, we summarize literature regarding the epidemiology of DM after AP and provide the rationale and an overview of the DREAM study.