- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Ersek, Mary"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Comfort Measures Orders and Hospital Transfers: Insights From the OPTIMISTIC Demonstration Project(Elsevier, 2019) Unroe, Kathleen T.; O'Kelly Phillips, Erin; Effler, Shannon; Ersek, Mary; Hickman, Susan E.; Medicine, School of MedicineContext Nursing facility residents and their families may identify “comfort measures” as their overall goal of care, yet some hospital transfers still occur. Objectives Describe nursing facility residents with comfort measures and their hospital transfers. Methods Mixed methods, including root cause analyses of transfers by registered nurses and interviews with a subset of health care providers and family members involved in transfers. Participants were residents in 19 central Indiana facilities with comfort measures orders who experienced unplanned transfers to the hospital between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016. Project demographic and clinical characteristics of the residents were obtained from the Minimum Data Set 3.0. Interviews were conducted with stakeholders involved in transfer decisions. Participants were prompted to reflect on reasons for the transfer and outcomes. Interviews were transcribed and coded using qualitative descriptive methods. Results Residents with comfort measures orders (n = 177) experienced 204 transfers. Most events were assessed as unavoidable (77%). Communication among staff, or between staff and the resident/family, primary care provider, or hospital was the most frequently noted area needing improvement (59.5%). In interviews, participants (n = 11) highlighted multiple issues, including judgments about whether decisions were “good” or “bad,” and factors that were important to decision-making, including communication, nursing facility capabilities, clinical situation, and goals of care. Conclusion Most transfers of residents with comfort measures orders were considered unavoidable. Nonetheless, we identified several opportunities for improving care processes, including communication and addressing acute changes in status.Item High-Quality Nursing Home and Palliative Care-One and the Same(Elsevier, 2022) Ersek, Mary; Unroe, Kathleen T.; Carpenter, Joan G.; Cagle, John G.; Stephens, Caroline E.; Stevenson, David G.; Medicine, School of MedicineMany individuals receiving post-acute and long-term care services in nursing homes have unmet palliative and end-of-life care needs. Hospice has been the predominant approach to meeting these needs, although hospice services generally are available only to long-term care residents with a limited prognosis who choose to forego disease-modifying or curative therapies. Two additional approaches to meeting these needs are the provision of palliative care consultation through community- or hospital-based programs and facility-based palliative care services. However, access to this specialized care is limited, services are not clearly defined, and the empirical evidence of these approaches’ effectiveness is inadequate. In this paper, we review the existing evidence and challenges with each of these three approaches. We then describe a model for effective delivery of palliative and end-of-life care in nursing homes, one in which palliative and end-of-life care are seen as integral to high quality nursing home care. To achieve this vision, we make four recommendations: 1) Promote internal palliative and end-of-life care capacity through comprehensive training and support; 2) Ensure that state and federal payment policies and regulations do not create barriers to delivering high quality, person-centered palliative and end-of-life care; 3) Align nursing home quality measures to include palliative and end-of-life care-sensitive indicators; and 4) Support access to and integration of external palliative care services. These recommendations will require changes in the organization, delivery, and reimbursement of care. All nursing homes should provide high-quality palliative and end-of-life care, and this paper describes some key strategies to make this goal a reality.Item Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment for Nursing Home Residents with Dementia(Wiley, 2015) Kim, Hyejin; Ersek, Mary; Bradway, Christine; Hickman, Susan E.; Department of Nursing, IU School of NursingPurpose Many nursing home (NH) residents with dementia receive burdensome, aggressive treatments at the end of life (EOL). The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatments (POLSTs) paradigm is a strategy to enhance EOL care. This article describes the history and features of the POLST paradigm, discusses the potential advantages of using this paradigm for NH residents with dementia, and briefly explores challenges that nurse practitioners (NPs) face in using the POLST for persons with dementia. Data sources Review of the literature. Conclusions Potential advantages associated with implementation of POLST in NH residents with dementia include increased communication and documentation about residents’ EOL care preferences, increased concordance between care preferences documented in POLST forms and EOL care provided to residents, and lower rates of unwanted, burdensome treatments at EOL. POLST may also guide NPs in communicating EOL care options with residents and/or their surrogates. However, difficulty interpreting and explaining POLST care options, lack of understanding of POLST, limited discussions, and issues with surrogate authority and scope of practice are challenges that NPs may face in caring for NH residents with dementia. Implications for practice NPs should assess and optimize their knowledge and skills to conduct goals of care discussions, including POLST discussions.Item The Role of the Palliative Care Registered Nurse in the Nursing Facility Setting(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-04) Hickman, Susan E.; Parks, Melanie; Unroe, Kathleen T.; Ott, Monica; Ersek, Mary; School of NursingThere is a growing recognition of significant, unmet palliative care needs in nursing facilities, yet limitations in the workforce limit access to palliative care services. Attention to palliation is particularly important when there are efforts to reduce hospitalizations to help ensure there are no unintended harms associated with treating residents in place. A specialized palliative care registered nurse (PCRN) role was developed as part of the OPTIMISTIC (Optimizing Patient Transfers, Impacting Medical quality, and Improving Symptoms: Transforming Institutional Care) program, a federally funded project to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Working in collaboration with existing clinical staff and medical providers, the PCRN focuses on managing symptoms, advance care planning, achieving goal concordant care, and promoting quality of life. The PCRN serves as a resource for families through education and support. The PCRN also provides education and mentorship to staff to increase their comfort, knowledge, and skills with end-of-life care. The goals of this article are to provide an overview of the PCRN role and its implementation in nursing facilities and describe core functions that are transferrable to other contexts.Item Symptom Burden and Quality of Life for Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: Uplift Trial Early Data(Oxford University Press, 2022-12-20) Cagle, John; Orth, Jessica; Becker, Todd; Zhang, Peiyuan; Ersek, Mary; Tu, Wanzhu; Floyd, Alex; Unroe, Kathleen; Biostatistics, School of Public HealthCommunication difficulties in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia make valid assessment of symptoms and quality-of-life (QOL) challenging. Thus, researchers and clinicians frequently rely on proxy-based measures. The End-of-life Dementia-Comfort Assessment in Dying (EOLD-CAD) and two single-item QOL measures (7-point item; 5-point item) have been used in several studies, though evaluation of their psychometric properties is limited. We used baseline data from an ongoing multi-site randomized trial (UPLIFT) to describe symptoms and QOL and examine the measures’ validity and reliability in 138 residents with moderate to severe dementia living at 16 facilities. Descriptive data and assessments of convergent validity and inter-rater reliability are provided. Based on assessments by 134 staff and 45 family, physical symptoms, physical distress, and emotional distress were reported as infrequent by staff and family; indications of well-being were more frequently observed. Median QOL was the same for staff and family observers (4=“Life is so-so” [7-point item]; 3=“Fair” [5-point item]). Inter-observer assessments of resident QOL (staff vs. family) were correlated (7-point item: r=0.47, ICC=.643; 5-point item: r=0.48, ICC=.645, p<.05 for all). Seven of 18 EOLD-CAD symptoms were significantly positively correlated. ICC values varied between high or moderately high: shortness-of-breath (ICC=.74), choking (ICC=.65), gurgling (ICC=.81), agitation (ICC=.51), fear (ICC=.46), crying (ICC=.65), peace (ICC=.57), and care resistance (ICC=.68) (p<.05 for all). Choking and gurgling were the most prominently reported symptoms by both groups.Early findings provide a contemporary assessment of QOL and symptoms among NH residents with dementia. Measurement properties affirm general reliability and validity of study instruments.Item Systematic Advance Care Planning and Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations of Nursing Facility Residents(Wiley, 2019-08) Hickman, Susan E.; Unroe, Kathleen T.; Ersek, Mary; Stump, Timothy E.; Tu, Wanzhu; Ott, Monica; Sachs, Greg A.; School of NursingBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The Optimizing Patient Transfers, Impacting Medical Quality, Improving Symptoms: Transforming Institutional Care (OPTIMISTIC) project is a successful, multicomponent demonstration project to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations of long‐stay nursing facility residents. Systematic advance care planning (ACP) is a core component of the intervention, based on research suggesting ACP is associated with decreased hospitalizations of nursing facility residents. The purpose of this study was to describe associations between ACP documentation resulting from the OPTIMISTIC intervention and hospitalizations. DESIGN Specially trained project nurses were embedded in 19 nursing facilities and systematically engaged in ACP as part of a larger demonstration project. PARTICIPANTS Residents (n = 1482) enrolled in the demonstration project for a minimum of 30 days between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016. MEASUREMENTS ACP status: (1) Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) comfort measures or do not hospitalize (DNH) orders; (2) ACP orders with no hospitalization limit (eg, code status only); and (3) no ACP (potentially avoidable and all‐cause hospitalizations per 1000 resident days). RESULTS Residents with POST comfort measures/DNH orders (33.2% or n = 493) were less likely than residents with no ACP (14.7% or n = 218) to experience a potentially avoidable hospitalization (P = .001) or all‐cause hospitalization (P = .001). These differences became statistically nonsignificant after adjusting for age, functional status, and cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION In this successful multicomponent demonstration project to reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations, ACP outcomes were not associated with hospitalization rates of nursing facility residents after adjusting for resident characteristics. These findings highlight the challenge of measuring the contributions of individual components of complex, multicomponent interventions. Associations between lower hospitalization rates and ACP completion may be influenced by contextual factors, such as clinical expertise and resources to manage acute conditions leading to hospitalization, in addition to interventions to increase ACP.Item Using Palliative Leaders in Facilities to Transform Care for People with Alzheimer’s Disease (UPLIFT-AD): protocol of a palliative care clinical trial in nursing homes(BMC, 2023-07-26) Unroe, Kathleen T.; Ersek, Mary; Tu, Wanzhu; Floyd, Alexander; Becker, Todd; Trimmer, Jessica; Lamie, Jodi; Cagle, John; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Palliative care is an effective model of care focused on maximizing quality of life and relieving the suffering of people with serious illnesses, including dementia. Evidence shows that many people receiving care in nursing homes are eligible for and would benefit from palliative care services. Yet, palliative care is not consistently available in nursing home settings. There is a need to test pragmatic strategies to implement palliative care programs in nursing homes. Methods/design: The UPLIFT-AD (Utilizing Palliative Leaders in Facilities to Transform care for people with Alzheimer's Disease) study is a pragmatic stepped wedge trial in 16 nursing homes in Maryland and Indiana, testing the effectiveness of the intervention while assessing its implementation. The proposed intervention is a palliative care program, including 1) training at least two facility staff as Palliative Care Leads, 2) training for all staff in general principles of palliative care, 3) structured screening for palliative care needs, and 4) on-site specialty palliative care consultations for a one-year intervention period. All residents with at least moderate cognitive impairment, present in the facility for at least 30 days, and not on hospice at baseline are considered eligible. Opt-out consent is obtained from legal decision-makers. Outcome assessments measuring symptoms and quality of care are obtained from staff and family proxy respondents at four time points: pre-implementation (baseline), six months after implementation, at 12 months (conclusion of implementation), and six months after the end of implementation. Palliative care attitudes and practices are assessed through surveys of frontline nursing home staff both pre- and post-implementation. Qualitative and quantitative implementation data, including fidelity assessments and interviews with Palliative Care Leads, are also collected. The study will follow the Declaration of Helsinki. Discussion: This trial assesses the implementation and effectiveness of a robust palliative care intervention for residents with moderate-to-advanced cognitive impairment in 16 diverse nursing homes. The intervention represents an innovative, pragmatic approach that includes both internal capacity-building of frontline nursing home staff, and support from external palliative care specialty consultants.