Browsing by Author "Engelman, Corinne D."

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating the association between APOE genotypes and cognitive resilience in SuperAgers
    (Wiley, 2025-01-03) Durant, Alaina; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Bush, William S.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Naj, Adam C.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Hassenstab, Jason J.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Haines, Jonathan L.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Kukull, Walter A.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Thompson, Paul M.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Mayeux, Richard; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Crane, Paul K.; Dumitrescu, Logan C.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Gaynor, Leslie S.; The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: “SuperAgers” are older adults (ages 80+) whose cognitive performance resembles that of adults in their 50s to mid‐60s. Factors underlying their exemplary aging are underexplored in large, racially diverse cohorts. Using eight cohorts, we investigated the frequency of APOE genotypes in SuperAgers compared to middle‐aged and older adults. Method: Harmonized, longitudinal memory, executive function, and language scores in Non‐Hispanic White (NHW) and Non‐Hispanic Black (NHB) participants were obtained from the ADSP Phenotype Harmonization Consortium. Scores were age‐ and sex‐adjusted. SuperAgers (NHW = 1,625; NHB = 106) included individuals 80+ years of age with a memory score equal to or exceeding individuals aged 50‐64 and language and executive function domain scores within normal limits who remain cognitively normal across visits. SuperAgers were compared to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases (NHW = 8,400; NHB = 925) and cognitively normal controls (NHW = 7,355; NHB = 1,305), as well as age‐defined subgroups (Young = ages 50‐64, Older = ages 65‐79, Oldest‐Old = age 80+). We performed binary logistic regression analyses comparing APOE‐ε2 and APOE‐ε4 alleles (0 = none, 1 = 1+ alleles present) among SuperAgers and their counterparts, covarying for sex and education. We corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini‐Hochberg procedure. Results: Across racial groups, SuperAgers had significantly higher proportions with APOE‐ε2 alleles and lower proportions with APOE‐ε4 alleles compared to cases (Table 1, Figure 1). Similar differences were observed between SuperAgers and Young and Old Controls, although differences were restricted to APOE‐ε4 in NHB comparisons. NHW SuperAgers had lower proportions with APOE‐ε4 alleles compared to Oldest‐Old Controls; APOE‐ε2 proportions did not differ. Conclusion: Within our large, harmonized cohort, larger proportions of SuperAgers had APOE‐ε2 alleles and smaller proportions had APOE‐ε4 alleles than AD cases across both NHW and NHB participants. Crucially, higher proportions of NHW SuperAgers had APOE‐ε2 alleles than younger controls (ages<80) and lower proportions had APOE‐ε4 alleles than all controls including age‐matched controls (ages 80+). This work provides the strongest evidence to date that APOE is associated with SuperAging. APOE‐ε2 did not differentiate NHB SuperAgers from controls nor APOE‐ε4 from other oldest‐old adults in present analyses. Future work will extend to whole genome analysis to identify novel genomic drivers of SuperAging.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating the association of APOE genotype and cognitive resilience in SuperAgers
    (medRxiv, 2025-01-07) Durant, Alaina; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Klinedinst, Brandon S.; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Hassenstab, Jason; Naj, Adam C.; Wang, Li-San; Johnson, Sterling C.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Kukull, Walter A.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Bush, William S.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Mayeux, Richard; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Thompson, Paul M.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Crane, Paul K.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Archer, Derek B.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Gaynor, Leslie S.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Importance: "SuperAgers" are oldest-old adults (ages 80+) whose memory performance resembles that of adults in their 50s to mid-60s. Factors underlying their exemplary memory are underexplored in large, racially diverse cohorts. Objective: To determine the frequency of APOE genotypes in non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White SuperAgers compared to middle-aged (ages 50-64), old (ages 65-79), and oldest-old (ages 80+) controls and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia cases. Design: This multicohort study selected data from eight longitudinal cohort studies of normal aging and AD. Setting: Variable recruitment criteria and follow-up intervals, including both population-based and clinical-based samples. Participants: Inclusion in our analyses required APOE genotype, that participants be age 50+, and are identified as either non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White. In total, 18,080 participants were included in the present study with a total of 78,549 datapoints. Main outcomes and measures: Harmonized, longitudinal memory, executive function, and language scores were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project Phenotype Harmonization Consortium (ADSP-PHC). SuperAgers, controls, and AD dementia cases were identified by cognitive scores using a residual approach and clinical diagnoses across multiple timepoints when available. SuperAgers were compared to AD dementia cases and cognitively normal controls using age-defined bins (middle-aged, old, oldest-old). Results: Across racialized groups, SuperAgers had significantly higher proportions of APOE-ε2 alleles and lower proportions of APOE-ε4 alleles compared to cases. Similar differences were observed between SuperAgers and middle-aged and old controls. Non-Hispanic White SuperAgers had significantly lower proportions of APOE-ε4 alleles and significantly higher proportions of APOE-ε2 alleles compared to all cases and controls, including oldest-old controls. In contrast, non-Hispanic Black SuperAgers had significantly lower proportions of APOE-ε4 alleles compared to cases and younger controls, and significantly higher proportions of APOE-ε2 alleles compared only to cases. Conclusions and relevance: In the largest study to date, we demonstrated strong evidence that the frequency of APOE-ε4 and -ε2 alleles differ between non-Hispanic White SuperAgers and AD dementia cases and cognitively normal controls. Differences in the role of APOE in SuperAging by race underlines distinctions in mechanisms conferring resilience across race groups given likely differences in genetic ancestry.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Genetic and Sex Associations with Earlier Estimated Onset of Amyloid Positivity from over 4000 Harmonized Positron Emission Tomography Images
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Castellano, Tonnar; Wang, Ting Chen; Nolan, Emma; Archer, Derek B.; Cody, Karly; Harrison, Theresa M.; Wu, Yiyang; Durant, Alaina; Janve, Vaibhav A.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Jagust, William J.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Resnick, Susan M.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Bilgel, Murat; Saykin, Andrew J.; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Mayeux, Richard; Betthauser, Tobey J.; Dumitrescu, Logan C.; Mormino, Elizabeth; Hohman, Timothy J.; Koran, Mary Ellen I.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: New techniques have been developed to estimate the age when someone converted to amyloid positivity (EAOA) from PET, oftentimes offering information about a participant decades before they joined a research study. EAOA is variable across populations but we do not know the causes for these differences. This study aims to validate APOE associations with EAOA and explore genetic and sex‐based factors with EAOA. Methods: Data from six cohorts were analyzed. Our analysis included 4220 non‐Hispanic white people (57.6% women; 86.7% cognitively unimpaired at baseline scan). Amyloid PET data were harmonized using gaussian mixture models. EAOA was calculated using the sampled iterative local approximation (SILA) algorithm. Sex differences in EAOA were compared using t‐tests amongst amyloid positive individuals. A genome‐wide association study of EAOA was performed. Gene analyses were conducted using MAGMA. Results: Average EAOA was 81.1 years across all individuals regardless of amyloid status. APOE e2 homozygotes had slightly later EAOA than e3/e3 homozygotes. APOE e4 homozygotes converted to amyloid positivity 8.2 years before e3/e4 heterozygotes and over two decades earlier than e3 homozygotes. APOE e2/e4 converted to positivity roughly three years later than e3/e4 and nearly ten years earlier than e3 homozygotes. APOE genotype differences in EAOA described were statistically significant (p < .01). There were significant sex differences between men and women when examining amyloid positivity. Men converted to amyloid positivity over 2 years later than women (65.3 vs 63.2 years, p=3.23x10‐5). The rs12981369 polymorphism in ABCA7 was associated with EAOA (β = 2.14, p=9.27×10−9). Brain eQTL databases indicate associations between rs12981369 and gene expression of ABCA7. Gene‐level analyses revealed significant associations for ABCA7, HMHA1, and KIF13B. Conclusion: This study further describes the role of APOE and reveals roles for ABCA7 and KIF13B on amyloid onset. We identified a novel variant on chromosome 19 correlating with later amyloid onset conversion and highlight important differences between sexes. These findings highlight EAOA as a powerful endophenotype of AD and offer insights into potential drug‐targetable mechanisms for early AD intervention.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Novel rare variant associations with late‐life cognitive performance
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Regelson, Alexandra N.; Archer, Derek B.; Durant, Alaina; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Bush, William S.; Kuzma, Amanda B.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Mayeux, Richard; Kukull, Walter A.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Larson, Eric B.; Nho, Kwangsik; Goate, Alison M.; Renton, Alan E.; Marcora, Edoardo; Fulton-Howard, Brian; Patel, Tulsi; Risacher, Shannon L.; DeStefano, Anita L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Habes, Mohamad; Seshadri, Sudha; Satizabal, Claudia L.; Maillard, Pauline; Toga, Arthur W.; Crawford, Karen; Tosun, Duygu; Vance, Jeffery M.; Mormino, Elizabeth; DeCarli, Charles S.; Montine, Thomas J.; Beecham, Gary; Biber, Sarah A.; De Jager, Philip L.; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Lee, Annie J.; Brickman, Adam M.; Reitz, Christiane; Manly, Jennifer J.; Lu, Qiongshi; Rentería, Miguel Arce; Deming, Yuetiva; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Crane, Paul K.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Dumitrescu, Logan C.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: Despite evidence that Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is highly heritable, there remains substantial “missing” heritability, likely due in part to the effect of rare variants and to the past reliance on case‐control analysis. Here, we leverage powerful endophenotypes of AD (cognitive performance across multiple cognitive domains) in a rare variant analysis to identify novel genetic drivers of cognition in aging and disease. Method: We leveraged 8 cohorts of cognitive aging with whole genome sequencing data from the AD Sequencing Project to conduct rare variant analyses of multiple domains of cognition (N = 9,317; mean age = 73; 56% female; 52% cognitively unimpaired). Harmonized scores for memory, executive function, and language were derived using confirmatory factor analysis models. Participants genetically similar to the 1000Genomes EUR reference panel were included in analysis. Variants included in the analysis had a minor allele frequency < 0.01, a minor allele count of ≥ 10, and were annotated as a high or moderate impact SNP using VEP. Associations of baseline scores in each cognitive domain were performed using SKAT‐O, including 92,905 rare variants among 16,243 genes. All tests were adjusted for sex, baseline age, sequencing center and platform, and genetic principal components. Correction for multiple comparisons was completed using the Benjamini‐Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure. Result: APOE was associated with baseline memory, language, and executive function, though only memory survived multiple‐test correction (p.FDR = 0.001). Outside of APOE, ITPKB was associated with baseline executive function (p.FDR = 0.048). AKTIP, SHCBP1L, and CCNF showed nominal associations with multiple domains of cognition that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons (p.FDRs<0.07). Conclusion: These results highlight novel rare variants associated with cognition. IPTKB is an AGORA nominated gene target for potential AD treatment. It is important in the regulation of immune cells and displays higher expression in the cortex of AD patients compared to controls. CCNF and AKTIP are brain eQTLs and have differential RNA expression in AD brains. Previously, variants in AKTIP have been associated with educational attainment, intelligence, and memory, while variants in CCNF have been associated with neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Future analyses will incorporate longitudinal cognition and expand into additional populations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive resilience to Alzheimer's disease
    (Oxford University Press, 2022) Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Mahoney, Emily R.; Smith, Alexandra N.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Scollard, Phoebe; Choi, Seo Eun; Bush, William S.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Lu, Qiongshi; Fardo, David W.; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Kaczorowski, Catherine C.; Hernandez Saucedo, Hector; Widaman, Keith F.; Buckley, Rachel F.; Properzi, Michael J.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Yang, Hyun Sik; Harrison, Theresa M.; Hedden, Trey; Nho, Kwangsik; Andrews, Shea J.; Tommet, Douglas; Hadad, Niran; Sanders, R. Elizabeth; Ruderfer, Douglas M.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Zhong, Xiaoyuan; Raghavan, Neha S.; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); A4 Study Team; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li San; Cruchaga, Carlos; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Cox, Nancy J.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Larson, Eric B.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Mayeux, Richard; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Bennett, David A.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Approximately 30% of elderly adults are cognitively unimpaired at time of death despite the presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology at autopsy. Studying individuals who are resilient to the cognitive consequences of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology may uncover novel therapeutic targets to treat Alzheimer's disease. It is well established that there are sex differences in response to Alzheimer's disease pathology, and growing evidence suggests that genetic factors may contribute to these differences. Taken together, we sought to elucidate sex-specific genetic drivers of resilience. We extended our recent large scale genomic analysis of resilience in which we harmonized cognitive data across four cohorts of cognitive ageing, in vivo amyloid PET across two cohorts, and autopsy measures of amyloid neuritic plaque burden across two cohorts. These data were leveraged to build robust, continuous resilience phenotypes. With these phenotypes, we performed sex-stratified [n (males) = 2093, n (females) = 2931] and sex-interaction [n (both sexes) = 5024] genome-wide association studies (GWAS), gene and pathway-based tests, and genetic correlation analyses to clarify the variants, genes and molecular pathways that relate to resilience in a sex-specific manner. Estimated among cognitively normal individuals of both sexes, resilience was 20-25% heritable, and when estimated in either sex among cognitively normal individuals, resilience was 15-44% heritable. In our GWAS, we identified a female-specific locus on chromosome 10 [rs827389, β (females) = 0.08, P (females) = 5.76 × 10-09, β (males) = -0.01, P(males) = 0.70, β (interaction) = 0.09, P (interaction) = 1.01 × 10-04] in which the minor allele was associated with higher resilience scores among females. This locus is located within chromatin loops that interact with promoters of genes involved in RNA processing, including GATA3. Finally, our genetic correlation analyses revealed shared genetic architecture between resilience phenotypes and other complex traits, including a female-specific association with frontotemporal dementia and male-specific associations with heart rate variability traits. We also observed opposing associations between sexes for multiple sclerosis, such that more resilient females had a lower genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis, and more resilient males had a higher genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Overall, we identified sex differences in the genetic architecture of resilience, identified a female-specific resilience locus and highlighted numerous sex-specific molecular pathways that may underly resilience to Alzheimer's disease pathology. This study illustrates the need to conduct sex-aware genomic analyses to identify novel targets that are unidentified in sex-agnostic models. Our findings support the theory that the most successful treatment for an individual with Alzheimer's disease may be personalized based on their biological sex and genetic context.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex-specific genetic predictors of memory, executive function, and language performance
    (Wiley, 2022) Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Smith, Alexandra N.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse B.; Bush, William S.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Lu, Qiongshi; Fardo, David W.; Widaman, Keith F.; Buckley, Rachel F.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Naj, Adam C.; Clark, Lindsay R.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); A4 Study Team; The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Kukull, Walter A.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Larson, Eric B.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Mayeux, Richard; Thompson, Paul M.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is more prevalent in women than men, and robust evidence shows sex differences in the biological response to the AD neuropathological cascade. However, there is a lack of large-scale genetic studies on sex-specific genetic predictors of AD-related cognitive outcomes. Thus, we sought to elucidate the sex-specific genetic etiology of memory, executive function, and language performance. Method: This study included six cohorts of cognitive aging (Nmales=7,267, Nfemales=9,518). We applied psychometric approaches to build harmonized memory, executive function, and language composite scores. Next, for all domains, we calculated slopes from the cognitive scores (two or more timepoints) with linear mixed effects models. Then we performed sex-stratified and sex-interaction GWAS on these phenotypes, covarying for baseline age and the first three genetic principal components. We meta-analyzed across cohorts with a fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analyses for all models restricted the sample to cognitively unimpaired individuals. Result: In addition to well-established associations with cognition at the APOE locus, we identified three genetic loci that showed sex-specific effects with cognition. A chromosome 16 locus (rs114106271), a splicing-quantitative trait locus for RP11-152O14.4 and LINC02180 in the testis (GTEx), associated with baseline memory performance in men (β=0.13, P=2.40×10-8; PInteraction=8.96×10-6; Figures 1-2) but not in women (β=-0.01, P=0.76). A chromosome 14 locus (rs34074573), an expression-quantitative trait locus (GTEx) for HOMEZ (a homeobox gene), and for BCL2L2 (a previously reported AD risk gene), associated with longitudinal memory performance in men (β=-0.01, P=4.15×10-8; PInteraction=5.83×10-7; Figures 3-4) but not in women (β=0.001, P=0.09). Finally, a chromosome 6 locus (rs9382966) associated with longitudinal language performance in men with near genome-wide significance (β=-0.004, P=6.29×10-8; PInteraction=2.01×10-4) but not in women (β=-0.0003, P=0.61). Conclusion: Our results highlight some key sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive outcomes. Findings further suggest that some sex-specific genetic predictors have domain-specific associations, providing an exciting opportunity to better understand the molecular basis of memory, executive function, and language through genomic analysis. Although our findings need to be replicated, our GWAS analyses highlight the contribution of sex-specific genetic predictors beyond the APOE locus in conferring risk for late-life cognitive decline.