Browsing by Author "Emmett, Thomas W."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hospital Readmissions in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review
    (Wiley, 2018-04-25) Orman, Eric S.; Ghabril, Marwan; Emmett, Thomas W.; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission is a significant problem for patients with complex chronic illnesses such as liver cirrhosis. PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the range of readmission risk in patients with cirrhosis and the impact of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review of studies identified in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2000 to May 2017. STUDY SELECTION: We examined studies that reported early readmissions (up to 90 days) in patients with cirrhosis. Studies were excluded if they did not examine the association between readmission and at least 1 variable or intervention. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, setting, population, interventions, comparisons, and detailed information on readmissions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 1363 records reviewed, 26 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these studies, 21 were retrospective, and there was significant variation in the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of 30-day readmissions was 26%(95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-30%). Few studies examined readmission preventability or the relationship between readmissions and social determinants of health. Reasons for readmission were highly variable. An increased MELD score was associated with readmissions in most studies. Readmission was associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmissions frequently occur in patients with cirrhosis and are associated with liver disease severity. The impact of functional and social factors on readmissions is unclear.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Limitation of Life-Sustaining Care in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    (Wiley, 2019-05) McPherson, Katie; Carlos, W. Graham, III; Emmett, Thomas W.; Slaven, James E.; Torke, Alexia M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    When life-sustaining treatments (LST) are no longer effective or consistent with patient preferences, limitations may be set so that LSTs are withdrawn or withheld from the patient. Many studies have examined the frequency of limitations of LST in intensive care unit (ICU) settings in the past 30 years. This systematic review describes variation and patient characteristics associated with limitations of LST in critically ill patients in all types of ICUs in the United States. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed by a medical librarian between December 2014 and April 2017. A total of 1,882 unique titles and abstracts were reviewed, 113 were selected for article review, and 36 studies were fully reviewed. Patient factors associated with an increased likelihood of limiting LST included white race, older age, female sex, poor preadmission functional status, multiple comorbidities, and worse illness severity score. Based on several large, multicenter studies, there was a trend toward a higher frequency of limitation of LST over time. However, there is large variability between ICUs in the proportion of patients with limitations and on the proportion of deaths preceded by a limitation. Increases in the frequency of limitations of LST over time suggests changing attitudes about aggressive end-of-life-care. Limitations are more common for patients with worse premorbid health and greater ICU illness severity. While some differences in the frequency of limitations of LST may be explained by personal factors such as race, there is unexplained wide variability between units.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Number of implants placed for complete‐arch fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    (Wiley, 2018-10) Polido, Waldemar Daudt; Aghaloo, Tara; Emmett, Thomas W.; Taylor, Thomas D.; Morton, Dean; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Hospital Dentistry, School of Dentistry
    Objectives The main purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes related to the number of implants utilized to support complete‐arch fixed prostheses, both for the maxilla and the mandible. Materials and methods This review followed the reporting guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). A focused question using the PICO format was developed, questioning whether “In patients with an implant supported fixed complete dental prosthesis, do implant and prosthetic survival outcomes differ between five or more compared to fewer than five supporting implants?”. A comprehensive search of the literature was formulated and performed electronically and by hand search. Two independent reviewers selected the papers and tabulated results. Primary outcomes analyzed were implant and prosthesis survival. Implant distribution, loading, and type of retention were observed as secondary outcomes, as they relate to the number of implants. A meta‐analysis was performed to compare results for studies by number of implants. Results The search strategy identified 1,579 abstracts for initial review. Based on evaluation of the abstracts, 359 articles were identified for full‐text evaluation. From these, 93 were selected and included in this review, being nine RCTs, 42 prospective and 42 retrospective. Of the 93 selected studies, 28 reported number of implants for the maxilla, 46 for the mandible, and 19 for both maxilla and mandible. The most reported number of implants for the “fewer than five” group is 4 for the maxilla, and 3 and 4 for the mandible, whereas for the “five or more” implants group, the most reported number of implants was 6 for the maxilla and 5 for the mandible. No significant differences in the primary outcomes analyzed were identified when fewer than five implants per arch were compared with five or more implants per arch (p > 0.05), in a follow‐up time ranging from 1 to 15 years (median of 8 years). Conclusions Evidence from this systematic review and meta‐analysis suggests that the use of fewer than five implants per arch, when compared to five or more implants per arch, to support a fixed prosthesis of the completely edentulous maxilla or mandible, present similar survival rates, with no statistical significant difference at a p < 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95%.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prevalence of Advanced, Precancerous Colorectal Neoplasms in Black and White Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    (AGA, 2018) Imperiale, Thomas F.; Abhyankar, Priya R.; Stump, Timothy E.; Emmett, Thomas W.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & Aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are higher in black vs white populations. The reasons for these disparities are not clear, yet some guidelines recommend screening black persons for CRC starting at ages 40–45 years. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of advanced adenomas (AAs) and advanced, precancerous colorectal neoplasms (ACNs) between asymptomatic black and white screen-eligible adults. Methods We searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify articles (published from 1946 through June 2017) that reported prevalence values of AA or ACN in average-risk black and white individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. Two authors independently assessed study quality and risk for bias using a modified validated quality assessment instrument. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 2 authors independently abstracted descriptive and quantitative data from each study. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to determine risk differences and odds ratios (ORs). Results From 1653 articles, we identified 9 studies for analysis, comprising 302,128 individuals. Six of the 9 studies were of high methodological quality, had a low risk for bias, and were included in the meta-analysis. In these 9 studies, the overall prevalence values for AA and ACN did not differ significantly between back (6.57%) and white screened individuals (6.20%; OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81–1.30). Among a subgroup of 5 studies, the prevalence of proximal AA and ACN was significantly higher in black (3.30%) than in white screened individuals (2.42%; OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12–1.30). Excluding the largest study did not affect overall prevalence (OR, 0.99; CI, 0.73–1.34) but eliminated the difference in prevalence of proximal AA or ACN (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.87–2.52). Conclusions In a meta-analysis, we found the overall prevalence of AA and ACN did not differ significantly between average-risk black and white persons, indicating that the age at which to begin CRC screening need not differ based on race.