IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks :: Browsing by Author "Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker"

Browsing by Author "Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 14

Comparing neonatal morbidity and mortality estimates across specialty in periviable counseling
(Taylor & Francis, 2015-12) Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; McKenzie, Fatima; Panoch, Janet; Frankel, Richard M.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IU School of Medicine
Objective To describe and compare estimates of neonatal morbidity and mortality communicated by neonatologists and obstetricians in simulated periviable counseling encounters. Methods A simulation-based study of 16 obstetricians (OBs) and 15 neonatologists counseling standardized patients portraying pregnant women with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks gestation. Two investigators tabulated all instances of numerically-described risk estimates across individuals and by specialty. Results Overall, 12/15 (80%) neonatologists utilized numeric estimates of survival; 6/16 (38%) OBs did. OBs frequently deferred the discussion of “exact numbers” to neonatologists. The twelve neonatologists provided 13 unique numeric estimates, ranging from 3% to 50% survival. Half of those neonatologists provided 2-3 different estimates in a single encounter. By comparison, six OBs provided 4 unique survival estimates (“50%”, “30-40%”, “1/3-1/2”, “<10%”). Only 2/15 (13%) neonatologists provided numeric estimates of survival without impairment. None of the neonatologists used the term ‘intact’ survival, while 5 OBs did. Three neonatologists gave numeric estimates of long-term disability and one OB did. Conclusion We found substantial variation in estimates and noteworthy omissions of discussions related to long-term morbidity. Across specialties, we noted inconsistencies in the use and meaning of terms like ‘intact survival.’ More tools and training are needed to improve the quality and consistency of periviable risk-communication.
Coverage Effects of the ACA's Medicaid Expansion on Adult Reproductive-Aged Women, Postpartum Mothers, and Mothers with Older Children
(Springer, 2022) Bullinger, Lindsey Rose; Simon, Kosali; Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
Objectives: We estimate the effect of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Medicaid expansions on Medicaid coverage of reproductive-aged women at varying childbearing stages. Methods: Using data from the American Community Survey (ACS) (n = 1,977,098) and a difference-in-differences approach, we compare Medicaid coverage among low-income adult women without children, postpartum mothers, and mothers of children older than one year in expansion states to non-expansion states, before and after the expansions. Results: The ACA's Medicaid expansion increased Medicaid coverage among adult women with incomes between 101 and 200% of the federal poverty line (FPL) without children by 10.7 percentage points (54 percent, p < 0.01). Coverage of mothers with children older than one year increased by 9.5 percentage points (34 percent, p < 0.01). Coverage of mothers with infants rose by 7.9 percentage points (21 percent, p < 0.01). Conclusions for practice: Within the population of adult reproductive-aged women, we find a "fanning out" of effects from the ACA's Medicaid expansions. Childless women experience the largest gains in coverage while mothers of infants experience the smallest gains; mothers of children greater than one year old fall in the middle. These results are consistent with ACA gains being the smallest among the groups least targeted by the ACA, but also show substantial gains (one fifth) even among postpartum mothers.
Creation of a Decision Support Tool for Expectant Parents Facing Threatened Periviable Delivery: Application of a User-Centered Design Approach
(Springer, 2019-06) Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Hoffman, Shelley M.; Lynch, Dustin; Jeffries, Erin; Jenkins, Kelli; Wiehe, Sarah; Bauer, Nerissa; Kuppermann, Miriam; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is optimal in the context of periviable delivery, where the decision to pursue life-support measures or palliation is both preference sensitive and value laden. We sought to develop a decision support tool (DST) prototype to facilitate SDM by utilizing a user-centered design research approach. Methods We convened four patient and provider advisory boards with women and their partners who had experienced a surviving or non-surviving periviable delivery, pregnant women who had not experienced a prior preterm birth, and obstetric providers. Each 2-h session involved design research activities to generate ideas and facilitate sharing of values, goals, and attitudes. Participant feedback shaped the design of three prototypes (a tablet application, family story videos, and a virtual reality experience) to be tested in a final session. Results Ninety-five individuals (48 mothers/partners; 47 providers) from two hospitals participated. Most participants agreed that the prototypes should include factual, unbiased outcomes and probabilities. Mothers and support partners also desired comprehensive explanations of delivery and care options, while providers wanted a tool to ease communication, help elicit values, and share patient experiences. Participants ultimately favored the tablet application and suggested that it include family testimonial videos. Conclusion Our results suggest that a DST that combines unbiased information and understandable outcomes with family testimonials would be meaningful for periviable SDM. User-centered design was found to be a useful method for creating a DST prototype that may lead to improved effectiveness, usability, uptake, and dissemination in the future, by leveraging the expertise of a wide range of stakeholders.
Doctor, What Would You Do?: An ANSWER for patients requesting advice about value-laden decisions
(AAP, 2015-10) Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Torke, Alexia M.; Helft, Paul; Wocial, Lucia D.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IU School of Medicine
This article presents a previously published framework, summarized in the mnemonic ANSWER (A, Active listening; N, Needs assessment; S, Self-awareness/reflection; W, Whose perspective?; E, Elicit values; R, Respond) for how to respond to the question, “Doctor, what would you do?” when considering medical decisions that are preference-sensitive, meaning there is limited or debatable evidence to guide clinical recommendations, or are value-laden, such that the “right” decision may differ based on the context or values of a given individual. Using the mnemonic and practical examples, we attempt to make the framework for an ethically appropriate approach to these conversations more accessible for clinicians. Rather than a decision rule, this mnemonic represents a set of points to consider when physicians are considering an ethically acceptable response that fosters trust and rapport. We apply this approach to a case of periviable counseling, among the more emotionally challenging and value-laden antenatal decisions faced by providers and patients.
Examining the Impact of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Risk Calculator Estimation on Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling
(Sage, 2019-05-27) Jeffries, Erin; Falcone-Wharton, Amy; Daggy, Joanne; Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
Background. Because failed trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) is associated with greater morbidity than planned cesarean, it is important to distinguish women with a high likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) from those likely to fail. The VBAC Calculator may help make this distinction but little is known about how often providers use it; nor whether use improves risk estimation and/or influences TOLAC counseling. Methods. In a cross-sectional survey, a convenience sample of obstetrical providers reported their likelihood (4-point Likert-type scale) to “Recommend,”“Offer,” or “Agree to” TOLAC for patients presented first through five clinical vignettes; then, in different order, by corresponding VBAC calculator estimates. Results. Of the 85 (of 101, 84% response rate) participants, 88% routinely performed TOLAC, but only 21% used the Calculator. The majority (67.1% to 89.3%) overestimated the likelihood of success for all but one vignette (which had the highest estimate of success). Most providers (42% to 89%) recommended TOLAC for all five vignettes. Given calculated estimates, the majority of providers (67% to 95%) recommended TOLAC for success estimates exceeding 40%. For estimates between 20% and 40%, most providers offered (58%) or agreed (68%) to TOLAC; and even below 20%, over half still agreed to TOLAC. The vignette with the lowest estimate of success (18.7%) had the weakest intraprovider agreement (kappa = 0.116; confidence interval [CI] = 0.045–0.187), whereas the strongest agreement was found in the two vignettes with highest success estimates: 77.9% (kappa = 0.549; CI = 0.382–0.716) and 96.6% (kappa = 0.527; CI = 0.284–0.770). Limitations. Survey responses may not reflect actual practice patterns. Conclusion. Providers are overly optimistic in their clinical estimation of VBAC success. Wider use of decision support could aid in risk stratification and TOLAC counseling to reduce patient morbidity.
The influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveries
(Nature Publishing Group, 2015-03) Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; McKenzie, Fatima; Hendrix, Kristin S.; Perkins, Susan M.; Zimet, Gregory D.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IU School of Medicine
Objective Determine the relative influence of patient's resuscitation preferences on periviable delivery management. Methods Surveyed 295 obstetrician-gynecologists about managing periviable preterm premature rupture of membranes. Across 10 vignettes, we systematically varied gestational age; occupation; method of conception; and resuscitation preference. Physicians rated their likelihood (0-10) of proceeding with induction, steroids, and cesarean. Data were analyzed via conjoint analysis. Results 205 physician responses were included. Median ratings for management decisions were: induction 1.89; steroids 5.00; cesarean for labor 3.89; cesarean for distress 4.11. Gestational age had the greatest influence on physician ratings across all decisions (importance values ranging from 72.6-86.6), followed by patient's resuscitation preference (range= 9.3-21.4). Conclusion Gestational age is weighted more heavily than patients’ resuscitation preferences in obstetricians’ decision-making for periviable delivery management. Misalignment of antenatal management with parental resuscitation preferences may adversely affect periviable outcomes. Interventions are needed to facilitate more patient-centered decision-making in periviable care.
Intention to treat: obstetrical management at the threshold of viability
(Elsevier, 2020) Tonismae, Tiffany R.; Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Bhamidipalli, Surya Sruthi; Fadel, William F.; Carlos, Christine; Andrews, Bree; Fritz, Katie A.; Leuthner, Steven R.; Lawrence, Christin; Laventhal, Naomi; Hayslett, Drew; Coleman, Tasha; Famuyide, Mobolaji; Feltman, Dalia; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
Background Despite medical advances in the care of extremely preterm neonates and growing acceptance of resuscitation at 23 and even 22 weeks gestation, controversy remains concerning the use of antepartum obstetric intervention s that are intended to improve outcomes in the setting of anticipated extremely preterm birth. In the absence of demonstrated benefit at <23 weeks gestation and with uncertain benefit at 23 weeks gestation, previous obstetric committee opinions have advised against their use at these gestational ages. Objective The purpose of this study was to review the use of obstetric intervention s at the threshold of viability based on neonatal resuscitation plan and to review the odds of survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge based on use of obstetric intervention s with adjustment for neonatal factors. Study Design This retrospective study of 6 study centers reviewed pregnant patients who were admitted between 22+0/7 and 24+6/7 weeks gestation facing delivery from 2011–2015. Patients with known anomalies or missing data were excluded. Records were reviewed for demographics, resuscitation plan, and obstetric intervention s. Mode of delivery, delivery room care, and final infant dispositions were recorded. Multiple gestations were included as 1 pregnancy in regard to the use of obstetric intervention s and were excluded from survival analysis. Results Four hundred seventy-eight mothers met the inclusion criteria. When resuscitation was planned, mothers were more likely to receive all conventional obstetric intervention s (antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection, tocolytics, and Group Beta Streptococcus prophylaxis), regardless of gestational age at admission, and were more likely to be delivered by cesarean section (P<.05). Analyzed as a group, when antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate, tocolytics and Group Beta Streptococcus prophylaxis were administered, the odds of survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge increased for newborn infants who were born at 22 (odds ratio, 11.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.405–91.4) and 23 weeks gestation (odds ratio, 15.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.747-64.11; P<.05). In singletons, the odds of survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge was not improved by cesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery, even after adjustment for the use of additional interventions, weight, gender, and gestational age (odds ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.8; P=.912). Conclusion In this study, when postnatal resuscitation was planned at 22 and 23 weeks gestation, women were more likely to receive antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate, and antibiotics; provision of this bundle imparted survival benefit at 23 weeks gestation but could not be demonstrated at 22 weeks gestation because of the small sample size. These findings support of neonate-oriented obstetric interventions in the setting of delivery at 23 weeks gestation when resuscitation is planned and further exploration of optimal obstetric care when resuscitation of infants who were born at 22 weeks gestation is anticipated.
Maternal-Fetal Medicine physicians' practice patterns for 22-week delivery management
(Taylor & Francis, 2016) Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; McKenzie, Fatima; Robinson, Barret K.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IU School of Medicine
OBJECTIVE: To describe Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) physicians' practice patterns for 22-week delivery management. MEHODS: Surveyed 750 randomly-sampled members of the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, querying MFMs' practices and policies guiding 22-week delivery management. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-five (43%) MFMs responded. Nearly all (87%) would offer induction. Twenty-eight percent would order steroids, and 12% would perform cesarean for a patient desiring resuscitation. Offering induction differed significantly based on the provider's practice setting, region, religious service attendance and political affiliation. In multivariable analyses, political affiliation remained a significant predictor of offering induction (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Most MFMs offer induction for PPROM at 22 weeks. A noteworthy proportion is willing to order steroids and perform cesarean. Personal beliefs and practice characteristics may contribute to these decisions. While little is known about the efficacy of these interventions at 22 weeks, some MFMs will offer obstetrical intervention if resuscitation is intended.
Maternal-Fetal Medicine physicians’ practice patterns for 22-week delivery management
(Taylor and Francis, 2015) Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; McKenzie, Fatima; Robinson, Barrett K.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IU School of Medicine
Objective: To describe Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) physicians’ practice patterns for 22-week delivery management. Mehods: Surveyed 750 randomly-sampled members of the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, querying MFMs’ practices and policies guiding 22-week delivery management. Results: Three hundred and twenty-five (43%) MFMs responded. Nearly all (87%) would offer induction. Twenty-eight percent would order steroids, and 12% would perform cesarean for a patient desiring resuscitation. Offering induction differed significantly based on the provider’s practice setting, region, religious service attendance and political affiliation. In multivariable analyses, political affiliation remained a significant predictor of offering induction (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Most MFMs offer induction for PPROM at 22 weeks. A noteworthy proportion is willing to order steroids and perform cesarean. Personal beliefs and practice characteristics may contribute to these decisions. While little is known about the efficacy of these interventions at 22 weeks, some MFMs will offer obstetrical intervention if resuscitation is intended.
Outcomes of a Two-Visit Protocol for Long Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents and Young Adults
(Elsevier, 2022) Wilkinson, Tracey A.; Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker; Cheng, Erika R.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
Objectives: To examine outcomes of a 2-visit protocol for placement of intrauterine or subdermal contraception. Study design: We identified all women ages 15 to 27 who received an order for an intrauterine or subdermal contraceptive between January 2014-December 2016. We examined time from order to contraceptive placement and reasons for incomplete orders. Results: We identified 1,192 unique patients who received 1,323 orders for intrauterine or subdermal contraceptives; 68% were completed at a second visit. The median time from order to placement was 22 days (interquartile range = 15-35). Of incomplete orders, 41% were related to logistics of a subsequent visit. Twenty-eight percent of patients had a subsequent pregnancy within the study period. Conclusions: Efforts to provide same-day access for all contraceptive methods are needed.

Browsing by Author "Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker"

Results Per Page

Sort Options