Browsing by Author "Ebekozien, Osagie"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Baseline Quality Improvement Capacity of 33 Endocrinology Centers Participating in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative
    (American Diabetes Association, 2022) Marks, Brynn E.; Mungmode, Ann; Neyman, Anna; Levin, Laura; Rioles, Nicole; Eng, Donna; Lee, Joyce M.; Basina, Marina; Hawah-Jones, Nana; Mann, Elizabeth; O’Malley, Grenye; Wilkes, Meredith; Steenkamp, Devin; Aleppo, Grazia; Accacha, Siham; Ebekozien, Osagie; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    This article describes the evolution of the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) and provides insight into the development and growth of a successful type 1 diabetes quality improvement (QI) program. Since its inception 8 years ago, the collaborative has expanded to include centers across the United States with varying levels of QI experience, while simultaneously achieving many tangible improvements in type 1 diabetes care. These successes underscore the importance of learning health systems, data-sharing, benchmarking, and peer collaboration as drivers for continuous QI. Future efforts will include recruiting additional small- to medium-sized centers focused on adult care and underserved communities to further the goal of improving care and outcomes for all people living with type 1 diabetes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes
    (Springer, 2024-09) Phillip, Moshe; Achenbach, Peter; Addala, Ananta; Albanese-O'Neill, Anastasia; Battelino, Tadej; Bell, Kirstine J.; Besser, Rachel E. J.; Bonifacio, Ezio; Colhoun, Helen M.; Couper, Jennifer J.; Craig, Maria E.; Danne, Thomas; de Beaufort, Carine; Dovc, Klemen; Driscoll, Kimberly A.; Dutta, Sanjoy; Ebekozien, Osagie; Elding Larsson, Helena; Feiten, Daniel J.; Frohnert, Brigitte I.; Gabbay, Robert A.; Gallagher, Mary P.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Griffin, Kurt J.; Hagopian, William; Haller, Michael J.; Hendrieckx, Christel; Hendriks, Emile; Holt, Richard I. G.; Hughes, Lucille; Ismail, Heba M.; Jacobsen, Laura M.; Johnson, Suzanne B.; Kolb, Leslie E.; Kordonouri, Olga; Lange, Karin; Lash, Robert W.; Lernmark, Åke; Libman, Ingrid; Lundgren, Markus; Maahs, David M.; Marcovecchio, M. Loredana; Mathieu, Chantal; Miller, Kellee M.; O'Donnell, Holly K.; Oron, Tal; Patil, Shivajirao P.; Pop-Busui, Rodica; Rewers, Marian J.; Rich, Stephen S.; Schatz, Desmond A.; Schulman-Rosenbaum, Rifka; Simmons, Kimber M.; Sims, Emily K.; Skyler, Jay S.; Smith, Laura B.; Speake, Cate; Steck, Andrea K.; Thomas, Nicholas P. B.; Tonyushkina, Ksenia N.; Veijola, Riitta; Wentworth, John M.; Wherrett, Diane K.; Wood, Jamie R.; Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Given the proven benefits of screening to reduce diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) likelihood at the time of stage 3 type 1 diabetes diagnosis, and emerging availability of therapy to delay disease progression, type 1 diabetes screening programmes are being increasingly emphasised. Once broadly implemented, screening initiatives will identify significant numbers of islet autoantibody-positive (IAb+) children and adults who are at risk of (confirmed single IAb+) or living with (multiple IAb+) early-stage (stage 1 and stage 2) type 1 diabetes. These individuals will need monitoring for disease progression; much of this care will happen in non-specialised settings. To inform this monitoring, JDRF in conjunction with international experts and societies developed consensus guidance. Broad advice from this guidance includes the following: (1) partnerships should be fostered between endocrinologists and primary-care providers to care for people who are IAb+; (2) when people who are IAb+ are initially identified there is a need for confirmation using a second sample; (3) single IAb+ individuals are at lower risk of progression than multiple IAb+ individuals; (4) individuals with early-stage type 1 diabetes should have periodic medical monitoring, including regular assessments of glucose levels, regular education about symptoms of diabetes and DKA, and psychosocial support; (5) interested people with stage 2 type 1 diabetes should be offered trial participation or approved therapies; and (6) all health professionals involved in monitoring and care of individuals with type 1 diabetes have a responsibility to provide education. The guidance also emphasises significant unmet needs for further research on early-stage type 1 diabetes to increase the rigour of future recommendations and inform clinical care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correction to: Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody‑positive pre‑stage 3 type 1 diabetes
    (Springer, 2024) Phillip, Moshe; Achenbach, Peter; Addala, Ananta; Albanese-O'Neill, Anastasia; Battelino, Tadej; Bell, Kirstine J.; Besser, Rachel E. J.; Bonifacio, Ezio; Colhoun, Helen M.; Couper, Jennifer J.; Craig, Maria E.; Danne, Thomas; de Beaufort, Carine; Dovc, Klemen; Driscoll, Kimberly A.; Dutta, Sanjoy; Ebekozien, Osagie; Elding Larsson, Helena; Feiten, Daniel J.; Frohnert, Brigitte I.; Gabbay, Robert A.; Gallagher, Mary P.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Griffin, Kurt J.; Hagopian, William; Haller, Michael J.; Hendrieckx, Christel; Hendriks, Emile; Holt, Richard I. G.; Hughes, Lucille; Ismail, Heba M.; Jacobsen, Laura M.; Johnson, Suzanne B.; Kolb, Leslie E.; Kordonouri, Olga; Lange, Karin; Lash, Robert W.; Lernmark, Åke; Libman, Ingrid; Lundgren, Markus; Maahs, David M.; Marcovecchio, M. Loredana; Mathieu, Chantal; Miller, Kellee M.; O'Donnell, Holly K.; Oron, Tal; Patil, Shivajirao P.; Pop-Busui, Rodica; Rewers, Marian J.; Rich, Stephen S.; Schatz, Desmond A.; Schulman-Rosenbaum, Rifka; Simmons, Kimber M.; Sims, Emily K.; Skyler, Jay S.; Smith, Laura B.; Speake, Cate; Steck, Andrea K.; Thomas, Nicholas P. B.; Tonyushkina, Ksenia N.; Veijola, Riitta; Wentworth, John M.; Wherrett, Diane K.; Wood, Jamie R.; Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: First vs Later Surges
    (MDedge, 2022-01) Gallagher, Mary Pat; Rompicherla, Saketh; Ebekozien, Osagie; Wilkes, Meredith; Antal, Zoltan; Feuer, Alexis Jamie; Rioles, Nicole; Noor, Nudrat; Gabriel, Liana; O’Malley, Grenye; Golden, Lauren; Alonso, G. Todd; Ospelt, Emma; Odugbesan, Ori; Lyons, Sarah K.; Mungmode, Ann; Prahalad, Priya; Clements, Mark; Neyman, Anna; Demeterco-Berggren, Carla; Rapaport, Robert; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background Outcomes of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) have improved throughout the pandemic. However, whether outcomes of COVID-19 in the type 1 diabetes (T1D) population improved over time is unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate differences in COVID-19 outcomes for patients with T1D in the US. Method We analyzed data collected via a registry of patients with T1D and COVID-19 from 56 sites between April 2020 and January 2021. First, we grouped cases into First Surge (04/09/2020 - 07/31/2020, n=188) and Late Surge (08/01/2020 - 01/31/2021, n=410). Then, we compared outcomes between both groups using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Results Adverse outcomes were more frequent during the first surge including Diabetic Ketoacidosis (32% versus 15%, p<0.001), severe hypoglycemia (4% versus 1%, p=0.04) and hospitalization (52% versus 22%, p<0.001). The First surge cases were older (28 +/- 18.8 years versus 18.8 +/- 11.1 years, p<0.001), had higher hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (Median (IQR): 9.3 (4.0) versus 8.4(2.8), <0.001) and use public insurance (n(%): 107 (57) versus 154 (38), p <0.001). There were five times increased odds of hospitalization for adults (OR 5.01 (2.11,12.63) in the first surge compared to the late surge. Conclusion COVID-19 cases among patients with T1D reported during the first surge had a higher proportion of adverse outcomes than those presented in a later surge.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Institutional Barriers to the Successful Implementation of Telemedicine for Type 1 Diabetes Care
    (American Diabetes Association, 2024) Lee, Joyce M.; Ospelt, Emma; Noor, Nudrat; Mungmode, Ann; Ebekozien, Osagie; Gupta, Meenal; Malik, Faisal S.; Fogel, Naomi R.; Accacha, Siham; Hsieh, Susan; Wilkes, Meredith; Neyman, Anna; Vendrame, Francesco; T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The aim of this study was to describe rates of telemedicine use 18 months after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and to assess the institutional barriers to its implementation for type 1 diabetes care across centers of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. Observational electronic health record data capturing telemedicine rates from 15 U.S. centers between September 2020 and September 2021 and a survey of 33 centers capturing telemedicine rates and key components of telemedicine were analyzed. A capacity score was developed and summed to a total capacity score and compared with overall telemedicine rates across centers. Telemedicine visits decreased by 17.4% from September 2020 to September 2021. Generally, it was observed that the lower the average telemedicine capacity score, the lower the rate of telemedicine visits. Despite a decline in the utilization of telemedicine 18 months after the start of the pandemic, visit rates were still 20% higher than in the pre-pandemic period. However, there is a need to improve structural components to ensure telemedicine capacity and robust telemedicine utilization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Interventions to address global inequity in diabetes: international progress
    (Elsevier, 2023) Walker, Ashby F.; Graham, Sian; Maple-Brown, Louise; Egede, Leonard E.; Campbell, Jennifer A.; Walker, Rebekah J.; Wade, Alisha N.; Mbanya, Jean Claude; Long, Judith A.; Yajnik, Chittaranjan; Thomas, Nihal; Ebekozien, Osagie; Odugbesan, Oriyomi; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Agarwal, Shivani; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Diabetes is a serious chronic disease with high associated burden and disproportionate costs to communities based on socioeconomic, gender, racial, and ethnic status. Addressing the complex challenges of global inequity in diabetes will require intentional efforts to focus on broader social contexts and systems that supersede individual-level interventions. We codify and highlight best practice approaches to achieve equity in diabetes care and outcomes on a global scale. We outline action plans to target diabetes equity on the basis of the recommendations established by The Lancet Commission on Diabetes, organising interventions by their effect on changing the ecosystem, building capacity, or improving the clinical practice environment. We present international examples of how to address diabetes inequity in the real world to show that approaches addressing the individual within a larger social context, in addition to addressing structural inequity, hold the greatest promise for creating sustainable and equitable change that curbs the global diabetes crisis.