ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Duquette, Stephen P."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Combined Carpal Tunnel Release and Palmar Fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s Contracture Does Not Increase the Risk for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2018-08) Loewenstein, Scott Nathan; Duquette, Stephen P.; Adkinson, Joshua M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Hand surgery dogma suggests that simultaneous surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) results in an increased incidence of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). As a result, many surgeons do not perform surgery for the two conditions concurrently. Our goal was to determine the extent of this association. Methods: We identified all patients undergoing surgical treatment for CTS, DC, or both between April 1982 and March 2017 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), a large, multi-institutional, statewide information exchange. Demographics, comorbidities, and 1-year post-operative incidence of CRPS were recorded. Results: A total of 51,739 (95.6%) patients underwent carpal tunnel release (CTR) only, 2,103 (3.9%) underwent palmar fasciectomy (PF) only, and 305 (0.6%) underwent concurrent CTR and PF. There was no difference in the likelihood of developing CRPS (p=0.163) between groups. Independent risk factors for developing CRPS were younger age, anxiety, depression, epilepsy, gout, and history of fracture of the radius, ulna, or the carpus. Conclusions: Concurrent CTR and PF is not associated with an increased risk for developing CRPS. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and a history of upper extremity trauma are associated with the development of CRPS after surgery and should be discussed preoperatively as potential risk factors.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Tourniquet Use in Wide-Awake Carpal Tunnel Release
    (Sage, 2020-01) Sasor, Sarah E.; Cook, Julia A.; Duquette, Stephen P.; Lucich, Elizabeth A.; Cohen, Adam C.; Wooden, William A.; Tholpady, Sunil S.; Chu, Michael W.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common cause of upper extremity discomfort. Surgical release of the median nerve can be performed under general or local anesthetic, with or without a tourniquet. Wide-awake carpal tunnel release (CTR) (local anesthesia, no sedation) is gaining popularity. Tourniquet discomfort is a reported downside. This study reviews outcomes in wide-awake CTR and compares tourniquet versus no tourniquet use. Methods: Wide-awake, open CTRs performed from February 2013 to April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: with and without tourniquet. Demographics, comorbidities, tobacco use, operative time, estimated blood loss, complications and outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 304 CTRs were performed on 246 patients. The majority of patients were male (88.5%), and the mean age was 59.9 years. One hundred patients (32.9%) were diabetic, and 92 patients (30.2%) were taking antithrombotics. Seventy-five patients (24.7%) were smokers. A forearm tourniquet was used for 90 CTRs (29.6%). Mean operative time was 24.97 minutes with a tourniquet and 21.69 minutes without. Estimated blood loss was 3.16 mL with a tourniquet and 4.25 mL without. All other analyzed outcomes were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Operative time was statistically longer and estimated blood loss was statistically less with tourniquet use, but these findings are not clinically significant. This suggests that local anesthetic with epinephrine is a safe and effective alternative to tourniquet use in CTR. The overall rate of complications was low, and there were no major differences in postoperative outcomes between groups.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University