- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Draucker, Claire Burke"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 17
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A 4-Site Public Deliberation Project on the Acceptability of Youth Self-Consent in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: Assessment of Facilitator Fidelity to Key Principles(JMIR, 2025-02-13) Draucker, Claire Burke; Carrión, Andrés; Ott, Mary A.; Hicks, Ariel I.; Knopf, Amelia; School of NursingBackground: Public deliberation is an approach used to engage persons with diverse perspectives in discussions and decision-making about issues affecting the public that are controversial or value laden. Because experts have identified the need to evaluate facilitator performance, our research team developed a framework to assess the fidelity of facilitator remarks to key principles of public deliberation. Objective: This report describes how the framework was used to assess facilitator fidelity in a 4-site public deliberation project on the acceptability of minor self-consent in biomedical HIV prevention research. Methods: A total of 88 individuals participated in 4 deliberation sessions held in 4 cities throughout the United States. The sessions, facilitated by 18 team members, were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Facilitator remarks were highlighted, and predetermined coding rules were used to code the remarks to 1 of 6 principles of quality deliberations. A variety of display tables were used to organize the codes and calculate the number of facilitator remarks that were consistent or inconsistent with each principle during each session across all sites. A content analysis was conducted on the remarks to describe how facilitator remarks aligned or failed to align with each principle. Results: In total, 735 remarks were coded to one of the principles; 516 (70.2%) were coded as consistent with a principle, and 219 (29.8%) were coded as inconsistent. A total of 185 remarks were coded to the principle of equal participation (n=138, 74.6% as consistent; n=185, 25.4% as inconsistent), 158 were coded to expression of diverse opinions (n=110, 69.6% as consistent; n=48, 30.4% as inconsistent), 27 were coded to respect for others (n=27, 100% as consistent), 24 were coded to adoption of a societal perspective (n=11, 46% as consistent; n=13, 54% as inconsistent), 99 were coded to reasoned justification of ideas (n=81, 82% as consistent; n=18, 18% as inconsistent), and 242 were coded to compromise or movement toward consensus (n=149, 61.6% as consistent; n=93, 38.4% as inconsistent). Therefore, the counts provided affirmation that most of the facilitator remarks were aligned with the principles of deliberation, suggesting good facilitator fidelity. By considering how the remarks aligned or failed to align with the principles, areas where facilitator fidelity can be strengthened were identified. The results indicated that facilitators should focus more on encouraging quieter members to participate, refraining from expressing personal opinions, promoting the adoption of a societal perspective and reasoned justification of opinions, and inviting deliberants to articulate their areas of common ground. Conclusions: The results provide an example of how a framework for assessing facilitator fidelity was used in a 4-site deliberation project. The framework will be refined to better address issues related to balancing personal and public perspectives, managing plurality, and mitigating social inequalities.Item Activation in Persons with Opioid Use Disorders in Intenstive Outpatient Treatment(2021-12) Keen, Alyson Yvonne; Lu, Yvonne; Draucker, Claire Burke; Oruche, Ukamaka; Mazurenko, OlenaPersons with opioid use disorder (OUD) often receive intensive outpatient treatment (IOT) but these programs are associated with low rates of completion and high rates of relapse. Enhancing patient activation - taking an active role in one’s healthcare - would likely improve outcomes for persons with OUD in IOT. The overarching purpose of this dissertation is to describe how persons with OUD experience IOT, especially regarding activation. The dissertation includes three components. The first is an integrative review of 29 studies of activation in persons with mental health disorders generally. Results revealed that activation was related to several heath and treatment-related factors and some interventions, most notably educational programs, increased activation. The second and third components were based on interviews with 14 persons who had been enrolled in an IOT program in academic health centers. The second component was a constructivist grounded theory study conducted to describe the process people undergo as they participate in an IOT program. Participants described a process of connecting and disconnecting that included eight stages: (1) connecting with drugs, (2) disconnecting from everyday life, (3) connecting with the IOT program, (4) connecting with others in the IOT program, (5) disconnecting from drugs, (6) reconnecting with others, (7) reconnecting with self, and (8) disconnecting from the IOT program. The third component was a qualitative descriptive study conducted to describe types of instances in which persons play an active role in their IOT (activation). Participants described six types of instances: (1) making and enacting one’s own treatment decisions, (2) actively engaging in treatment planning with staff, (3) choosing to actively engage in groups, (4) making a commitment to treatment, (5) taking responsibility for one’s own recovery, and (6) taking actions to avoid relapse. The results of this dissertation will inform the development of strategies to enhance activation among persons with OUD in IOT with the goal of improving engagement and program outcomes.Item Adoption and Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment(2020-06) Thoele, Kelli Marie; Newhouse, Robin; Draucker, Claire Burke; Harle, Christopher; Fulton, JanetMore than 20 million people in the United States have a substance use disorder, resulting in negative individual and societal outcomes. An evidence-based intervention, Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), involves screening patients to assess for substance use and then providing a brief intervention and referral to treatment when indicated. This evidence-based intervention is underutilized in healthcare settings. The purpose of this dissertation was to contribute to the body of evidence regarding the implementation of SBIRT in healthcare settings. Specifically, the aims of this dissertation were to 1) provide an overview of the evidence regarding the use of implementation strategies to facilitate the implementation of SBIRT, 2) describe implementation of SBIRT by nurses in acute care hospitals, and 3) examine individual and organizational characteristics associated with the intra-organizational adoption of SBIRT. To review the literature, a scoping review was completed on 18 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The review found that leaders often train and educate stakeholders to facilitate the implementation of SBIRT, but less attention has been given to adapting the intervention or engaging patients. Additionally, implementation efforts led to increases in screening, but the evidence regarding the effect on brief intervention is inconclusive, and evidence regarding referral to treatment is scarce. Eighteen nurses participated in a qualitative descriptive study of the implementation of SBIRT, and data were analyzed using content analysis. Participants identified barriers and facilitators associated with the nurses’ attitudes and beliefs about SBIRT, organizational factors, and patients’ response to the SBIRT process. Participants indicated that SBIRT was a useful intervention that was best implemented by providing a clear process and incorporating SBIRT into an established workflow. To examine factors related to intra-organizational adoption of a tool to screen patients for substance use, two hundred twenty-two nurses participated in a crosssectional study. Results of this study indicate that training and the perception of peer usage of the intervention were significantly related to individual nurses’ use of the intervention in practice. The findings of this dissertation can inform research and practice regarding the implementation of SBIRT in healthcare settings.Item The decision making process in women diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer experiencing side effects related to oral endocrine therapy(2017-02-06) Milata, Jennifer Lynn; Carpenter, Janet S.; Draucker, Claire Burke; Otte, Julie; Zimet, GregOral endocrine therapy (OET) is standard therapy for millions of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer survivors (ER+BCS). OET reduces recurrence, mortality, and metastasis. ER+BCS often do not take their OET as recommended due to adverse side effects. The purpose of this dissertation was to develop an explanatory framework of decision making by women with ER+ breast cancer who report experiencing side effects from OET. This project was comprised of two components. The first component was a systematic review with three main findings: (1) side effects negatively impact OET non-adherence, (2) there is an absence of decisional supports provided to or available for ER+BCS who are experiencing OET side effects,, and (3) ER+BCS likely have unmet decisional needs related to OET. The second component was a grounded theory study that included 31 ER+BCS reporting OET side effects. During a single semi-structured interview, participants described the experience of OET over time. This study produced two qualitatively derived projects. First, a theoretical framework was developed that depicted four stages through which the experience of OET decision making unfolded. The stages were (1) being told what I need to do to live, (2) doing what I need to do to live, (3) enduring what I need to do to live, and (4) deciding how I want to live. Second, a typology was developed that depicted six sources of external decisional supports (healthcare providers, husbands, other breast cancer survivors, friends and family, the internet and other media sources, and God) that met four types of decisional needs (information about OET and its side effects, in-depth discussions about side effects, help in managing side effects, and emotional support). Findings can be used to develop interventions, such as decision aids, to promote quality decision making in women experiencing OET side effects.Item Exploring Mentoring Relationships Among Novice Nurse Faculty: A Grounded Theory(2021-07) Busby, Katie Ruth; Reising, Deanna L.; DeMeester, Deborah; Seybold, Peter J.; Draucker, Claire BurkeThe growing and aging population has created an increased demand for health care, resulting in a need for hundreds of thousands more nurses across the United States. As a result, additional nurse faculty are needed to teach the next generation of nurses. However, nurses who enter the faculty role in academia often come from various professional backgrounds with different educational preparation that may not equate to success with the tripartite faculty role of teaching, scholarship, and service. As a way to retain and develop novice faculty, mentoring relationships and programs are promoted as an intervention for career and psychosocial development within academia. Mentoring is an interpersonal process built on mutual trust and friendship to create a professional and personal bond. Mentoring relationships can help develop self-confidence, productivity, and career satisfaction among nurse faculty members. Effective mentoring relationships can ease the transition into academia and provide a vital foundation for productive academic careers. However, the interpersonal process that is the hallmark of mentoring can differ between a mentor and protégé, leading to vast differences in quality and effectiveness. Although mentoring is widely recommended, little is known about the process of mentoring relationships in academia or how novice nurse faculty utilize mentoring to transition into academia. The purpose of this qualitative grounded theory study is to uncover a theoretical framework that describes how mentoring relationships, as experienced by novice nurse faculty, unfold. Charmaz's method of grounded theory was used to interview full-time novice nurse faculty (N = 21) with three years or less in the faculty role from nursing programs across the United States. The grounded theory theoretical framework, Creating Mentorship Pathways to Navigate Academia captures the process of mentoring as experienced by novice nurse faculty within academia. The theoretical framework contains five main phases as described by novice nurse faculty being assigned a formal mentor, not having mentoring needs met, seeking an informal mentor, connecting with mentor, and doing the work of mentoring. Participants created mentorship pathways through both formal and informal mentoring relationships to navigate academia by acquiring knowledge, meeting expectations, and functioning in the role as a faculty member.Item From testing the water to riding the waves : new master of social work graduates' journey from student to professional(2015-07-23) Larimer, Susan; Lay, Kathy; Adamek, Margaret E.; Bennett, Robert B.; Draucker, Claire Burke; Khaja, KhadijaEvery year, more than 200 schools of social work graduate thousands of Master of Social Work (MSW) students. These graduates enter the world of work and continue on their journey toward becoming professional social workers. Surprisingly, very little is known in social work about the transition from student to professional, especially for MSW graduates. Related literature in nursing and education is reviewed in order to have a foundational knowledge of the transition process for similar professionals. The research questions for this study were: (a) What is the process of transition from student to employee like for new MSW graduates? (b) What are the factors that influence this transition during the first 18 months for MSW graduates? and (c) Are there critical junctures in the processes of transitioning from being a student through the first 18 months of MSW employment that are related to satisfaction and/or professional growth? This dissertation used qualitative, constructivist grounded theory methodology in order to study this relatively unknown subject. The conceptual model that emerged in this study is called Riding the Waves, and illustrates the transition process for new graduates learning to become a professional social worker. There are five stages of this model: Testing the Waters, Jumping In, Sinking or Swimming, Treading Water, and Riding the Waves. In Testing the Waters, critical issues of finding a job, negotiating a salary and licensure are salient. In Jumping In, new graduates experience orientation, examine preparedness from school and encounter the real world of work as opposed to their expectations. In Sinking or Swimming, new graduates negotiate not knowing, supervision, dealing with emotions and difficult work situations. In Treading Water, new graduates explore finding a balance between self-care and compassion fatigue and articulate job and compassion satisfaction. In the last stage, Riding the Waves, new graduates are more stable, gain confidence, find their voice and discuss what is ahead for them. Implications for social work students, educators, and employers are discussed including better preparing students for the transition, improving orientation and supervision, and providing the support that these new professionals require and deserve.Item The Health Care Encounters of Pregnant and Postpartum Women With Substance Use Disorders(2020-06) Renbarger, Kalyn Marie; Draucker, Claire Burke; Shieh, Carol; Moorman, Meg; Latham-Mintus, KenziePregnant and postpartum women with substance use disorders (SUDs) are likely to experience adverse health care encounters that contribute to poor health outcomes for them and their infants. The purpose of this dissertation is to describe the health care encounters of pregnant and postpartum women with SUDs. This dissertation includes two studies. The first study is a metasynthesis of published qualitative studies using a metasummary approach to classify the types of health care encounters experienced by pregnant and postpartum women with SUDs. A taxonomy of health care encounters was developed. Five types of adverse encounters were identified and labeled as (a) judgmental, (b) disparaging, (c) scrutinizing, (d) disempowering, and (e) deficient care. Three types of beneficial encounters were identified and labeled as (a) recovery-based, (b) accepting, and (c) effective care. The second study was a qualitative descriptive study conducted to describe factors that influence the formation of trusting relationships between maternity nurses and pregnant and postpartum women with SUDs. Interviews with 15 maternity nurses and 10 pregnant and postpartum women with SUDs were conducted. Content analysis of the participant narratives revealed a number of characteristics of maternity nurses and pregnant and postpartum women with SUDs that helped or hindered trusting relationships. Six characteristics of maternity nurses were identified and labeled as (a) rapport-building with women, (b) demeanor toward women, (c) provision of care, (d) provision of information, (e) attitude toward substance use, and (f) addiction expertise. Five characteristics of the women were identified and labeled as (a) engagement with nurses, (b) demeanor toward nurses, (c) acceptance of care, (d) investment in recovery, and (e) bonding with infant. Adverse encounters were often associated with provider stigma related to substance use during pregnancy and limited provider knowledge related to addiction. The findings will contribute to the development of strategies to improve the health care encounters of this population by promoting stigma awareness and communication skills training.Item Hospital Transfers: Perspectives of Nursing Home Residents and Nurses(2022-05) Ahmetovic, Alma; Hickman, Susan E.; Draucker, Claire Burke; Huber, Lesa; Unroe, Kathleen T.Between 1 million and 2.2 million nursing home residents are transferred to a hospital emergency department each year. These transfers are costly, have negative health outcomes, and can increase the morbidity and mortality of residents. Few studies, however, have provided in-depth descriptions of transfer experiences. The purpose of this study was to examine the transfer process between the nursing home and the hospital from the perspectives of nursing home residents and nurses, focusing on how decisions were made to transfer residents. Using a qualitative descriptive method, 22 participants (10 residents and 12 nurses) were recruited from four nursing homes located in rural Indiana. Purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews, and conventional content analysis were used to collect and analyze narratives obtained from residents and nurses about their experiences with a recent transfer and to develop four in-depth case descriptions of these transfers. The participants described four aspects of the transfer process: transfer decisions, transport experiences, hospital stays, and returns to the nursing home. The most common reason for transfers was an acute exacerbation of a chronic condition, and the decision to transfer was often made by a nurse. Most participants found aspects of the transfer, including their hospital stay, to be aversive or upsetting. The return to the nursing home was typically welcomed but often challenging due to problems with mobility, medication adjustments, and cognitive changes. Participants also provided several recommendations for avoiding potentially preventable transfers including adding “in-house” diagnostic testing and treatment equipment, improving staff competencies in managing acute exacerbations, increasing staffing, improving communication among staff, and increasing staff familiarity with resident histories and preferences. The findings have several clinical and policy implications for preventing or decreasing the negative effects of hospital transfers.Item Investigating Health Related Quality of Life in People with Schizophrenia(2019-02) Janela, Carlos M.; Draucker, Claire Burke; Carpenter, Janet S.; Oruche, Ukamaka M.; Minor, Kyle S.Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that significantly lessens health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A better understanding of HRQoL is needed to inform holistic and patient-centered treatments for schizophrenia. The purpose of this dissertation is to conduct an in-depth exploration of HRQoL in people with schizophrenia. The dissertation includes three components. The first component is an integrative literature review aimed at identifying factors associated with physical quality of life (QoL) in people with schizophrenia. The review reveals that symptoms of schizophrenia, depression, obesity or body mass index, and physical activity are associated with physical QoL in this population. The second and third components are based on illness narratives of 20 people with schizophrenia who had participated in a larger study of individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness. The second component of the dissertation is a qualitative descriptive study conducted to describe common HRQoL concerns in people with schizophrenia. The results indicate that these concerns were related to social relationships, psychiatric symptoms, psychiatric care, and employment. The third component of the dissertation is a parallel convergent mixed-methods study conducted to explore whether computerized lexical analysis (CLA) of illness narratives of people with schizophrenia can reveal their HRQoL concerns. CLA is an automatized process that counts words in text data and sorts them into pre-defined word categories. The results provide preliminary support for the potential use of CLA to efficiently assess HRQoL in people with schizophrenia as the CLA identified some of the HRQoL concerns that had been identified in the prior qualitative descriptive study. The results of the three studies reveal the complexity of the phenomenon of HRQoL in people with schizophrenia and can inform the development of strategies to identify and promote HRQoL in this population.Item Nursing students' experiences and responses to faculty incivility: a grounded theory approach(2016-08-26) Holtz, Heidi Kathleen; Rawl, Susan; Draucker, Claire Burke; McNelis, Angela M.; Ironside, Pamela M.In nursing education, faculty incivility toward students is a serious issue that affects the quality of nursing programs and is a precursor to incivility in the nursing workforce. Recent studies demonstrate that more nursing faculty members than previously thought engage in uncivil behaviors toward students. Faculty incivility can be distressing to nursing students and negatively impact learning environments, student learning, and perhaps patient outcomes. Little is known, however, about how students perceive experiences of faculty incivility and how these experiences unfold. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to develop a theoretical framework that describes how incidents of faculty incivility toward traditional Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students unfold. Thirty traditional BSN students from the National Student Nurses Association who had experienced faculty incivility participated in a semi-structured interview. Analysis of the participants’ narratives was done in two phases. In Study Part 1, content analytic procedures were used to develop a typology that describes six types of faculty incivility that were labeled as follows: judging or labeling students, impeding student progress, picking on students, putting students on the spot, withholding instruction, and forcing students into no-win situations. In Study Part 2, constant comparison analysis was conducted. Segments of data were coded, similar codes were grouped into categories, the dimensions of the categories were determined, and the categories were organized into the final framework. The framework depicts a three-stage process with a focus on strategies students use to manage faculty incivility. The strategies were labelled as followed: seeking help from other professors, commiserating with peers, going up “the chain of command,” keeping one’s “head down,” getting professional help, and giving oneself a “pep-talk.” The findings provide a foundation for the development of programs to reduce faculty incivility in BSN programs and to help students manage it when it occurs.