- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Doroshow, James H."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Cancer Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacoepidemiology: Setting a Research Agenda to Accelerate Translation(Oxford University Press, 2010-10-13) Freedman, Andrew N.; Sansbury, Leah B.; Figg, William D.; Potosky, Arnold L.; Smith, Sheila R. Weiss; Khoury, Muin J.; Nelson, Stefanie A.; Weinshilboum, Richard M.; Ratain, Mark J.; McLeod, Howard L.; Epstein, Robert S.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Schilsky, Richard L.; Liu, Geoffrey; Flockhart, David A.; Ulrich, Cornelia M.; Davis, Robert L.; Lesko, Lawrence J.; Zineh, Issam; Randhawa, Gurvaneet; Ambrosone, Christine B.; Relling, Mary V.; Rothman, Nat; Xie, Heng; Spitz, Margaret R.; Ballard-Barbash, Rachel; Doroshow, James H.; Minasian, Lori M.; Medicine, School of MedicineRecent advances in genomic research have demonstrated a substantial role for genomic factors in predicting response to cancer therapies. Researchers in the fields of cancer pharmacogenomics and pharmacoepidemiology seek to understand why individuals respond differently to drug therapy, in terms of both adverse effects and treatment efficacy. To identify research priorities as well as the resources and infrastructure needed to advance these fields, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop titled “Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Setting a Research Agenda to Accelerate Translation” on July 21, 2009, in Bethesda, MD. In this commentary, we summarize and discuss five science-based recommendations and four infrastructure-based recommendations that were identified as a result of discussions held during this workshop. Key recommendations include 1) supporting the routine collection of germline and tumor biospecimens in NCI-sponsored clinical trials and in some observational and population-based studies; 2) incorporating pharmacogenomic markers into clinical trials; 3) addressing the ethical, legal, social, and biospecimen- and data-sharing implications of pharmacogenomic and pharmacoepidemiologic research; and 4) establishing partnerships across NCI, with other federal agencies, and with industry. Together, these recommendations will facilitate the discovery and validation of clinical, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and genomic markers related to cancer treatment response and adverse events, and they will improve both the speed and efficiency by which new pharmacogenomic and pharmacoepidemiologic information is translated into clinical practice.Item COVID-19, Social Justice, and Clinical Cancer Research(Oxford University Press, 2020-10-15) Doroshow, James H.; Prindiville, Sheila; McCaskill-Stevens, Worta; Mooney, Margaret; Loehrer, Patrick J.; Medicine, School of MedicineThe COVID-19 pandemic and related socioeconomic events have markedly changed the environment in which cancer clinical trials are conducted. These events have resulted in a substantial, immediate-term decrease in accrual to both diagnostic and therapeutic cancer investigations as well as substantive alterations in patterns of oncologic care. The sponsors of clinical trials, including the United States National Cancer Institute, as well as the cancer centers and community oncology practices that conduct such studies, have all markedly adapted their models of care, usage of health care personnel, and regulatory requirements in the attempt to continue clinical cancer investigations while maintaining high levels of patient safety. In doing so, major changes in clinical trials practice have been embraced nationwide. There is a growing consensus that the regulatory and clinical research process alterations that have been adopted in response to the pandemic (such as the use of telemedicine visits to reduce patient travel requirements and the application of remote informed consent procedures) should be implemented long term. The COVID-19 outbreak has also refocused the oncologic clinical trials community on the need to bring clinical trials closer to patients by dramatically enhancing clinical trial access, especially for minority and underserved communities that have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic. In this Commentary, changes to the program of clinical trials supported by the National Cancer Institute that could improve clinical trial availability, effectiveness, and diversity are proposed.