- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Davis, Jessica L."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Anterior mediastinal neuroblastoma in an adult: an additional case of a rare tumor in an unusual location with review of the literature(BMC, 2023-11-29) Collins, Katrina; Ulbright, Thomas M.; Davis, Jessica L.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineNeuroblastoma is rare in the adult population, especially in thoracic or mediastinal locations, with only 25 previously reported cases. We report an additional example of primary thymic neuroblastoma in a previously asymptomatic 71-year-old man with an anterior mediastinal mass who underwent robotic excision with pericardium and adjacent lung. The tumor was a 5.2 cm partially encapsulated, white-tan and rubbery mass with grossly identifiable areas of necrosis (25%) and hemorrhage. Histologically, the specimen showed a rim of adipose tissue and residual thymic tissue with areas of cystic thymic epithelium and prominent lymphoid tissue containing Hassall’s corpuscles. The tumor was composed of uniform, round cells with scant cytoplasm and small nuclei with inconspicuous nucleoli set within a background of conspicuous neuropil. Mitotic figures were easily found. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells expressed synaptophysin, chromogranin, NKX2.2 (diffuse, nuclear), GFAP (patchy), SMI31 (neurofilament) (focal, cytoplasmic), and TdT (diffuse, nuclear), while lacking expression of CD99, TTF-1, CK 20, MCPyV, PHOX2B, Olig2, OCT3/4, CD45, CD3 and PAX5. S100 protein was negative in the neuroblastic cells, with scattered positive cells in a vague sustentacular-like pattern. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for isochromosome 12p and EWSR1 gene rearrangement were negative. As thymic neuroblastoma is extremely rare in adults, a neuroblastic tumor of germ cell origin (either primary or metastatic) or spread from a sinonasal tract tumor should be excluded because of differing treatments and prognoses. The properties of these rare neoplasms appear similar to olfactory neuroblastoma rather than pediatric-type neuroblastoma.Item Early, precise, and safe clinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of novel agents in the intact human tumor microenvironment(Frontiers Media, 2024-04-12) Gundle, Kenneth R.; Rajasekaran, Karthik; Houlton, Jeffrey; Deutsch, Gary B.; Ow, Thomas J.; Maki, Robert G.; Pang, John; Nathan, Cherie-Ann O.; Clayburgh, Daniel; Newman, Jason G.; Brinkmann, Elyse; Wagner, Michael J.; Pollack, Seth M.; Thompson, Matthew J.; Li, Ryan J.; Mehta, Vikas; Schiff, Bradley A.; Wenig, Barry I.; Swiecicki, Paul L.; Tang, Alice L.; Davis, Jessica L.; van Zante, Annemieke; Bertout, Jessica A.; Jenkins, Wendy; Turner, Atticus; Grenley, Marc; Burns, Connor; Frazier, Jason P.; Merrell, Angela; Sottero, Kimberly H. W.; Derry, Jonathan M. J.; Gillespie, Kate C.; Mills, Bre; Klinghoffer, Richard A.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: Drug development is systemically inefficient. Research and development costs for novel therapeutics average hundreds of millions to billions of dollars, with the overall likelihood of approval estimated to be as low as 6.7% for oncology drugs. Over half of these failures are due to a lack of drug efficacy. This pervasive and repeated low rate of success exemplifies how preclinical models fail to adequately replicate the complexity and heterogeneity of human cancer. Therefore, new methods of evaluation, early in the development trajectory, are essential both to rule-in and rule-out novel agents with more rigor and speed, but also to spare clinical trial patients from the potentially toxic sequelae (high risk) of testing investigational agents that have a low likelihood of producing a response (low benefit). Methods: The clinical in vivo oncology (CIVO®) platform was designed to change this drug development paradigm. CIVO precisely delivers microdose quantities of up to 8 drugs or combinations directly into patient tumors 4–96 h prior to planned surgical resection. Resected tissue is then analyzed for responses at each site of intratumoral drug exposure. Results: To date, CIVO has been used safely in 6 clinical trials, including 68 subjects, with 5 investigational and 17 approved agents. Resected tissues were analyzed initially using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays (115 biomarkers). As technology advanced, the platform was paired with spatial biology analysis platforms, to successfully track anti-neoplastic and immune-modulating activity of the injected agents in the intact tumor microenvironment. Discussion: Herein we provide a report of the use of CIVO technology in patients, a depiction of the robust analysis methods enabled by this platform, and a description of the operational and regulatory mechanisms used to deploy this approach in synergistic partnership with pharmaceutical partners. We further detail how use of the CIVO platform is a clinically safe and scientifically precise alternative or complement to preclinical efficacy modeling, with outputs that inform, streamline, and de-risk drug development.