Browsing by Author "Davies, Jane C."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis in Screened Populations
    (Elsevier, 2017-02) Farrell, Philip M.; White, Terry B.; Howenstine, Michelle S.; Munck, Anne; Parad, Richard B.; Rosenfeld, Margaret; Sommerburg, Olaf; Accurso, Frank J.; Davies, Jane C.; Rock, Michael J.; Sanders, Don B.; Wilschanski, Michael; Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle; Blau, Hannah; Gartner, Silvia; McColley, Susanna A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objective Cystic fibrosis (CF) can be difficult to diagnose, even when newborn screening (NBS) tests yield positive results. This challenge is exacerbated by the multitude of NBS protocols, misunderstandings about screening vs diagnostic tests, and the lack of guidelines for presumptive diagnoses. There is also confusion regarding the designation of age at diagnosis. Study design To improve diagnosis and achieve standardization in definitions worldwide, the CF Foundation convened a committee of 32 experts with a mission to develop clear and actionable consensus guidelines on diagnosis of CF with an emphasis on screened populations, especially the newborn population. A comprehensive literature review was performed with emphasis on relevant articles published during the past decade. Results After reviewing the common screening protocols and outcome scenarios, 14 of 27 consensus statements were drafted that apply to screened populations. These were approved by 80% or more of the participants. Conclusions It is recommended that all diagnoses be established by demonstrating dysfunction of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel, initially with a sweat chloride test and, when needed, potentially with newer methods assessing membrane transport directly, such as intestinal current measurements. Even in babies with 2 CF-causing mutations detected via NBS, diagnosis must be confirmed by demonstrating CFTR dysfunction. The committee also recommends that the latest classifications identified in the Clinical and Functional Translation of CFTR project [http://www.cftr2.org/index.php] should be used to aid with CF diagnosis. Finally, to avoid delays in treatment, we provide guidelines for presumptive diagnoses and recommend how to determine the age of diagnosis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multiple-Breath Washout as a Lung Function Test in Cystic Fibrosis: A Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Workshop Report
    (2015-06) Subbarao, Padmaja; Milla, Carlos; Aurora, Paul; Davies, Jane C.; Davis, Stephanie D.; Hall, Graham L.; Heltshe, Sonya; Latzin, Philipp; Lindblad, Anders; Pittman, Jessica E.; Robinson, Paul D.; Rosenfeld, Margaret; Singer, Florian; Starner, Tim D.; Ratjen, Felix; Morgan, Wayne; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    The lung clearance index (LCI) is a lung function parameter derived from the multiple-breath washout (MBW) test. Although first developed 60 years ago, the technique was not widely used for many years. Recent technological advances in equipment design have produced gains in popularity for this test among cystic fibrosis (CF) researchers and clinicians, particularly for testing preschool-aged children. LCI has been shown to be feasible and sensitive to early CF lung disease in patients of all ages from infancy to adulthood. A workshop was convened in January 2014 by the North American Cystic Fibrosis Foundation to determine the readiness of the LCI for use in multicenter clinical trials as well as clinical care. The workshop concluded that the MBW text is a valuable potential outcome measure for CF clinical trials in preschool-aged patients and in older patients with FEV1 in the normal range. However, gaps in knowledge about the choice of device, gas, and standardization across systems are key issues precluding its use as a clinical trial end point in infants. Based on the current evidence, there are insufficient data to support the use of LCI or MBW parameters in the routine clinical management of patients with CF.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Updated guidance on the management of children with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome/cystic fibrosis screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CRMS/CFSPID)
    (Elsevier, 2021-09) Barben, Jürg; Castellani, Carlo; Munck, Anne; Davies, Jane C.; de Winter-de Groot, Karin M.; Gartner, Silvia; Kashirskaya, Nataliya; Linnane, Barry; Mayell, Sarah J.; McColley, Susanna; Ooi, Chee Y.; Proesmans, Marijke; Ren, Clement L.; Salinas, Danieli; Sands, Dorota; Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle; Sommerburg, Olaf; Southern, Kevin W.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Over the past two decades there has been considerable progress with the evaluation and management of infants with an inconclusive diagnosis following Newborn Screening (NBS) for cystic Fibrosis (CF). In addition, we have an increasing amount of evidence on which to base guidance on the management of these infants and, importantly, we have a consistent designation being used across the globe of CRMS/CFSPID. There is still work to be undertaken and research questions to answer, but these infants now receive more consistent and appropriate care pathways than previously. It is clear that the majority of these infants remain healthy, do not convert to a diagnosis of CF in childhood, and advice on management should reflect this. However, it is also clear that some will convert to a CF diagnosis and monitoring of these infants should facilitate their early recognition. Those infants that do not convert to a CF diagnosis have some potential of developing a CFTR-RD later in life. At present, it is not possible to quantify this risk, but families need to be provided with clear information of what to look out for. This paper contains a number of changes from previous guidance in light of developing evidence, but the major change is the recommendation of a detailed assessment of the child with CRMS/CFSPID in the sixth year of age, including respiratory function assessment and imaging. With these data, the CF team can discuss future care arrangements with the family and come to a shared decision on the best way forward, which may include discharge to primary care with appropriate information. Information is key for these families, and we recommend consideration of a further appointment when the individual is a young adult to directly communicate the implications of the CRMS/CFSPID designation.