Browsing by Author "Danielson, Elizabeth C."

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analgesic Management of Pain in Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2018-09) Harle, Christopher A.; Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Derman, Wayne; Stuart, Mark; Dvorak, Jiri; Smith, Lisa; Hainline, Brian; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Objective: To identify the prevalence, frequency of use, and effects of analgesic pain management strategies used in elite athletes. Design: Systematic literature review. Data Sources: Six databases: Ovid/Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Empirical studies involving elite athletes and focused on the use or effects of medications used for pain or painful injury. Studies involving recreational sportspeople or those that undertake general exercise were excluded. Main Results: Of 70 articles found, the majority examined the frequency with which elite athletes use pain medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, anesthetics, and opioids. A smaller set of studies assessed the effect of medications on outcomes such as pain, function, and adverse effects. Oral NSAIDs are reported to be the most common medication, being used in some international sporting events by over 50% of athletes. Studies examining the effects of pain medications on elite athletes typically involved small samples and lacked control groups against which treated athletes were compared. Conclusions: Existing empirical research does not provide a sufficient body of evidence to guide athletes and healthcare professionals in making analgesic medication treatment decisions. Based on the relatively robust evidence regarding the widespread use of NSAIDs, clinicians and policymakers should carefully assess their current recommendations for NSAID use and adhere to a more unified consensus-based strategy for multidisciplinary pain management in elite athletes. In the future, we hope to see more rigorous, prospective studies of various pain management strategies in elite athletes, thus enabling a shift from consensus-based recommendations to evidence-based recommendations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Analysis of Primary Care Clinician Communication About Risk, Benefits, and Goals Related to Chronic Opioid Therapy
    (SAGE Publications, 2019-12-10) Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Mazurenko, Olena; Andraka-Christou, Barbara T.; DiIulio, Julie; Downs, Sarah M.; Hurley, Robert W.; Harle, Christopher A.; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Background. Safe opioid prescribing and effective pain care are particularly important issues in the United States, where decades of widespread opioid prescribing have contributed to high rates of opioid use disorder. Because of the importance of clinician-patient communication in effective pain care and recent initiatives to curb rising opioid overdose deaths, this study sought to understand how clinicians and patients communicate about the risks, benefits, and goals of opioid therapy during primary care visits. Methods. We recruited clinicians and patients from six primary care clinics across three health systems in the Midwest United States. We audio-recorded 30 unique patients currently receiving opioids for chronic noncancer pain from 12 clinicians. We systematically analyzed transcribed, clinic visits to identify emergent themes. Results. Twenty of the 30 patient participants were females. Several patients had multiple pain diagnoses, with the most common diagnoses being osteoarthritis (n = 10), spondylosis (n = 6), and low back pain (n = 5). We identified five themes: 1) communication about individual-level and population-level risks, 2) communication about policies or clinical guidelines related to opioids, 3) communication about the limited effectiveness of opioids for chronic pain conditions, 4) communication about nonopioid therapies for chronic pain, and 5) communication about the goal of the opioid tapering. Conclusions. Clinicians discuss opioid-related risks in varying ways during patient visits, which may differentially affect patient experiences. Our findings may inform the development and use of more standardized approaches to discussing opioids during primary care visits.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating a Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool for Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care
    (Thieme, 2022) Allen, Katie S.; Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Downs, Sarah M.; Mazurenko, Olena; Diiulio, Julie; Salloum, Ramzi G.; Mamlin, Burke W.; Harle, Christopher A.; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Objectives: The Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker (Tx Tracker) is a prototype decision support tool to aid primary care clinicians when caring for patients with chronic noncancer pain. This study evaluated clinicians' perceived utility of Tx Tracker in meeting information needs and identifying treatment options, and preferences for visual design. Methods: We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians from four health systems in Indiana. The interviews were conducted in two waves, with prototype and interview guide revisions after the first six interviews. The interviews included exploration of Tx Tracker using a think-aloud approach and a clinical scenario. Clinicians were presented with a patient scenario and asked to use Tx Tracker to make a treatment recommendation. Last, participants answered several evaluation questions. Detailed field notes were collected, coded, and thematically analyzed by four analysts. Results: We identified several themes: the need for clinicians to be presented with a comprehensive patient history, the usefulness of Tx Tracker in patient discussions about treatment planning, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker for patients with high uncertainty or risk, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker in aggregating scattered information, variability in expectations about workflows, skepticism about underlying electronic health record data quality, interest in using Tx Tracker to annotate or update information, interest in using Tx Tracker to translate information to clinical action, desire for interface with visual cues for risks, warnings, or treatment options, and desire for interactive functionality. Conclusion: Tools like Tx Tracker, by aggregating key information about past, current, and potential future treatments, may help clinicians collaborate with their patients in choosing the best pain treatments. Still, the use and usefulness of Tx Tracker likely relies on continued improvement of its functionality, accurate and complete underlying data, and tailored integration with varying workflows, care team roles, and user preferences.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How opioid prescribing policies influence primary care clinicians' treatment decisions and conversations with patients with chronic pain
    (Weston Medical, 2021) Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Harle, Christopher A.; Downs, Sarah M.; Militello, Laura; Mazurenko, Olena; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Objective: The 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain aimed to assist primary care clinicians in safely and effectively prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain. Individual states, payers, and health systems issued similar policies imposing various regulations around opioid prescribing for patients with chronic pain. Experts argued that healthcare organizations and clinicians may be misapplying the federal guideline and subsequent opioid prescribing policies, leading to an inadequate pain management. The objective of this study was to understand how primary care clinicians involve opioid prescribing policies in their treatment decisions and in their conversations with patients with chronic pain. Design: We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of data from 64 unique primary care visits and 87 post-visit interviews across 20 clinicians from three healthcare systems in the Midwestern United States. Using a multistep process and thematic analysis, we systematically analyzed data excerpts addressing opioid prescribing policies. Results: Opioid prescribing policies influenced clinicians' treatment decisions to not initiate opioids, prescribe fewer opioids overall (theme #1), and begin tapering and discontinuation of opioids (theme #2) for most patients with chronic pain. Clinical precautions, described in the opioid prescribing policies to monitor use, were directly invoked during visits for patients with chronic pain (theme #3). Conclusions: Opioid prescribing policies have multidimensional influence on clinician treatment decisions for patients with chronic pain. Our findings may inform future studies to explore mechanisms for aligning pressures around opioid prescribing, stemming from various opioid prescribing policies, with the need to deliver individualized pain care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Information Needs and Requirements for Decision Support in Primary Care: An Analysis of Chronic Pain Care
    (AMIA, 2018) Harle, Christopher A.; Apathy, Nate C.; Cook, Robert L.; Danielson, Elizabeth C.; DiIulio, Julie; Downs, Sarah M.; Hurley, Robert W.; Mamlin, Burke W.; Militello, Laura G.; Anders, Shilo; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Decision support system designs often do not align with the information environments in which clinicians work. These work environments may increase Clinicians’ cognitive workload and harm their decision making. The objective of this study was to identify information needs and decision support requirements for assessing, diagnosing, and treating chronic noncancer pain in primary care. We conducted a qualitative study involving 30 interviews with 10 primary care clinicians and a subsequent multidisciplinary systems design workshop. Our analysis identified four key decision requirements, eight clinical information needs, and four decision support design seeds. Our findings indicate that clinicians caring for chronic pain need decision support that aggregates many disparate information elements and helps them navigate and contextualize that information. By attending to the needs identified in this study, decision support designers may improve Clinicians’ efficiency, reduce mental workload, and positively affect patient care quality and outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Tenure & Turnover among State Health Officials from the SHO-CASE Survey: Correlates & Consequences of Changing Leadership
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020) Menachemi, Nir; Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Tilson, Hugh; Yeager, Valerie A.; Sellers, Katie; Halverson, Paul K.; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Objective: To examine characteristics associated with tenure length of State Health Officials (SHOs) and examine reasons and consequences for SHO turnover. Design: Surveys of current and former SHOs linked with secondary data from the United Health Foundation. Setting: Original survey responses from SHOs in the United States. Participants: Respondents included SHOs who served between 1973 and 2017. Main Outcome Measures: Tenure length and consequences of SHO turnover. Results: Average completed tenure among SHOs was 5.3 years (median = 4) and was shorter in recent time periods compared with decades prior. Older age at appointment (β = −0.109, P = .005) and those holding a management degree (β = −1.835, P = .017) and/or a law degree (β = −3.553, P < .001) were each associated with shorter SHO tenures. State Health Officials from states in the top quartile for health rankings had significantly longer average tenures (β = 1.717, P = .036). Many former SHOs believed that their tenure was too short and reported that their departure had either a significant or very large effect on their agency's ability to fulfill its mission. Conclusions: State Health Official tenures have become shorter over time and continue to be shorter than industry chief executive officers and best practice recommendations from organizational researchers. States have an opportunity to consider and address how factors within their control influence the stability of the SHO position.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain
    (Springer, 2018-11) Militello, Laura G.; Anders, Shilo; Downs, Sarah M.; Diiulio, Julie; Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Hurley, Robert W.; Harle, Christopher A.; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
    Chronic pain leads to reduced quality of life for patients, and strains health systems worldwide. In the US and some other countries, the complexities of caring for chronic pain are exacerbated by individual and public health risks associated with commonly used opioid analgesics. To help understand and improve pain care, this article uses the data frame theory of sensemaking to explore how primary care clinicians in the US manage their patients with chronic noncancer pain. We conducted Critical Decision Method interviews with ten primary care clinicians about 30 individual patients with chronic pain. In these interviews, we identified several patients, social/environmental, and clinician factors that influence the frames clinicians use to assess their patients and determine a pain management plan. Findings suggest significant ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical pain management decision making. Therefore, interventions to improve pain care might focus on supporting sensemaking in the context of clinical evidence rather than attempting to provide clinicians with decontextualized and/or algorithm-based decision rules. Interventions might focus on delivering convenient and easily interpreted patient and social/environmental information in the context of clinical practice guidelines.