- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Cree-Green, Melanie"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Differential loss of β-cell function in youth vs. adults following treatment withdrawal in the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) study(Elsevier, 2021) Utzschneider, Kristina M.; Tripputi, Mark T.; Kozedub, Alexandra; Barengolts, Elena; Caprio, Sonia; Cree-Green, Melanie; Edelstein, Sharon L.; El Ghormli, Laure; Hannon, Tamara S.; Mather, Kieren J.; Palmer, Jerry; Nadeau, Kristen J.; RISE Consortium; Medicine, School of MedicineAims: To compare OGTT-derived estimates of β-cell function between youth and adults with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes after treatment discontinuation in RISE. Methods: Youth (n = 89) and adults (n = 132) were randomized to 3 months glargine followed by 9 months metformin (G/M) or 12 months metformin (MET). Insulin sensitivity and β-cell responses were estimated from 3-hour OGTTs over 21 months. Linear mixed models tested for differences by time and age group within each treatment arm. Results: After treatment withdrawal, HbA1c increased in both youth and adults with a larger net increase in G/M youth vs. adults at 21 months. Among youth, β-cell function decreased starting at 12 months in G/M and 15 months in MET. Among adults, β-cell function remained relatively stable although insulin secretion rates decreased in G/M at 21 months. At 21 months vs. baseline β-cell function declined to a greater extent in youth vs. adults in both the G/M and MET treatment arms. Conclusions: After treatment withdrawal youth demonstrated progressive decline in β-cell function after stopping treatment with either G/M or MET. In contrast, β-cell function in adults remained stable despite an increase in HbA1c over time.Item Metformin Improves Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes(Endocrine Society, 2019-08) Cree-Green, Melanie; Bergman, Bryan C.; Cengiz, Eda; Fox, Larry A.; Hannon, Tamara S.; Miller, Kellee; Nathan, Brandon; Pyle, Laura; Kahn, Darcy; Tansey, Michael; Tichy, Eileen; Tsalikian, Eva; Libman, Ingrid; Nadeau, Kristen J.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineContext: Type 1 diabetes in adolescence is characterized by insulin deficiency and insulin resistance (IR), both thought to increase cardiovascular disease risk. We previously demonstrated that adolescents with type 1 diabetes have adipose, hepatic, and muscle IR, and that metformin lowers daily insulin dose, suggesting improved IR. However, whether metformin improves IR in muscle, hepatic, or adipose tissues in type 1 diabetes was unknown. Objective: Measure peripheral, hepatic, and adipose insulin sensitivity before and after metformin or placebo therapy in youth with obesity with type 1 diabetes. Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: Multi-center at eight sites of the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Participants: A subset of 12- to 19-year-olds with type 1 diabetes (inclusion criteria: body mass index ≥85th percentile, HbA1c 7.5% to 9.9%, insulin dosing ≥0.8 U/kg/d) from a larger trial (NCT02045290) were enrolled. Intervention: Participants were randomized to 3 months of metformin (N = 19) or placebo (N = 18) and underwent a three-phase hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp with glucose and glycerol isotope tracers to assess tissue-specific IR before and after treatment. Main outcome measures: Peripheral insulin sensitivity, endogenous glucose release, rate of lipolysis. Results: Between-group differences in change in insulin sensitivity favored metformin regarding whole-body IR [change in glucose infusion rate 1.3 (0.1, 2.4) mg/kg/min, P = 0.03] and peripheral IR [change in metabolic clearance rate 0.923 (-0.002, 1.867) dL/kg/min, P = 0.05]. Metformin did not impact insulin suppression of endogenous glucose release (P = 0.12). Adipose IR was not assessable with traditional methods in this highly IR population. Conclusions: Metformin appears to improve whole-body and peripheral IR in youth who are overweight/obese with type 1 diabetes.Item Precision and accuracy of hyperglycemic clamps in a multicenter study(American Physiological Society, 2021) Mather, Kieren J.; Tjaden, Ashley H.; Hoehn, Adam; Nadeau, Kristen J.; Buchanan, Thomas A.; Kahn, Steven E.; Arslanian, Silva A.; Caprio, Sonia; Atkinson, Karen M.; Cree-Green, Melanie; Utzschneider, Kristina M.; Edelstein, Sharon L.; RISE Consortium; Medicine, School of MedicineApplication of glucose clamp methodologies in multicenter studies brings challenges for standardization. The Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) Consortium implemented a hyperglycemic clamp protocol across seven centers using a combination of technical and management approaches to achieve standardization. Two-stage hyperglycemic clamps with glucose targets of 200 mg/dL and >450 mg/dL were performed utilizing a centralized spreadsheet-based algorithm that guided dextrose infusion rates using bedside plasma glucose measurements. Clamp operators received initial and repeated training with ongoing feedback based on surveillance of clamp performance. The precision and accuracy of the achieved stage-specific glucose targets were evaluated, including differences by study center. We also evaluated robustness of the method to baseline physiologic differences and on-study treatment effects. The RISE approach produced high overall precision (3%–9% variance in achieved plasma glucose from target at various times across the procedure) and accuracy (SD < 10% overall). Statistically significant but numerically small differences in achieved target glucose concentrations were observed across study centers, within the magnitude of the observed technical variability. Variation of the achieved target glucose over time in placebo-treated individuals was low (<3% variation), and the method was robust to differences in baseline physiology (youth vs. adult, IGT vs. diabetes status) and differences in physiology induced by study treatments. The RISE approach to standardization of the hyperglycemic clamp methodology across multiple study centers produced technically excellent standardization of achieved glucose concentrations. This approach provides a reliable method for implementing glucose clamp methodology across multiple study centers. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: The Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) study centers undertook hyperglycemic clamps using a simplified methodology and a decision guidance algorithm implemented in an easy-to-use spreadsheet. This approach, combined with active management including ongoing central data surveillance and routine feedback to study centers, produced technically excellent standardization of achieved glucose concentrations on repeat studies within and across study centers.Item Reproducibility of Glycemic Measures Among Dysglycemic Youth and Adults in the RISE Study(The Endocrine Society, 2023) Tjaden, Ashley H.; Edelstein, Sharon L.; Arslanian, Silva; Barengolts, Elena; Caprio, Sonia; Cree-Green, Melanie; Lteif, Amale; Mather, Kieren J.; Savoye, Mary; Xiang, Anny H.; Kahn, Steven E.; Medicine, School of MedicineAims: Previous work found poor reproducibility for measures of glycemia in individuals at risk for dysglycemia. Differences between youth and adults have not been assessed. Using youth and adults in the Restoring Insulin Secretion Study, we tested variability and classification concordance for hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), fasting and 2-hour glucose from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs). Methods: HbA1c and glucose on repeated samples obtained ∼6 weeks apart were compared in 66 youth (mean age 14.2 years) and 354 adults (52.7 years). Changes, coefficient of variation (CV), and concordance of diagnostic categories between the 2 visits were compared. Results: Mean difference between the 2 visits in HbA1c was higher in youth than adults (P < .001), while fasting glucose was similar and 2-hour glucose was lower in youth (P = .051). CV was smallest for HbA1c compared to fasting and 2-hour glucose. For HbA1c, youth had higher CV (P < .001); whereas CV for 2-hour glucose was lower for youth (P = .041). Classification concordance by HbA1c was lower in youth (P = .004). Using OGTT or HbA1c for classification, intervisit variability produced discordant classification in 20% of youth and 28% of adults. Using both fasting glucose and HbA1c, intervisit variability reduced discordant classification to 16% of adults while not improving classification in youth. Conclusions: Poor reproducibility and lack of classification concordance highlight the limitations of one-time testing, with important implications for assessing eligibility in clinical trials. Consideration should be given to using more than a single parameter for screening and diagnosis, especially when classification category is important.